Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07430436

Improving Self-regulation in Individuals With ADHD Through Adapted Karate Training

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effectiveness of Adaptive Karate Training (AKT) in improving self-regulation and daily function in children with ADHD, exploring the underlying mechanisms.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Is the AKT more effective than no karate training in enhancing functional performance, self-regulation and school QoL? 2. Are poorer executive functions, emotional regulation, and sensory processing associated with higher gains?

Researchers will compare two sequences: (1) A group receiving AKT followed by a no-intervention period; (2) A group receiving no intervention, followed by the AKT intervention, to see if differences are observed between intervention and no-intervention periods, both between groups and within participants over time.

Participants will engage in AKT sessions twice a week, each session lasting 60 minutes, over a period of two months.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

6 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Tel Aviv University

Tel Aviv, 6139001, Israel

About this study

Methods: Following baseline assessment (T1), participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two sequences. After an eight-week period, all participants will complete a second assessment (T2). The groups will then switch conditions: children who initially received the AKT will receive no intervention, while those in the control group will receive the AKT. A third assessment (T3) will be conducted for all participants eight weeks post T2. All assessments will be administered by an assessor blinded to group allocation.

Participants: Sample size calculation was performed with G*Power 3.1.9.7 to detect between group differences (F test, ANOVA: Repeated measures, within-between interaction) with a medium effect size (f=0.2), significance level=0.05 and power=0.8. The total sample size needed is 50, and considering ~ 10% dropout, a total of 55 children, ages 6-12 will be recruited.

Intervention: Adapted Karate Training (AKT) is a structured, group-based intervention derived from traditional karate practice and modified to accommodate the attentional, sensory, emotional, and self-regulatory characteristics of children with ADHD. The protocol emphasizes continuity of participation, positive experiences, and the development of individualized self-regulation strategies through adapted movement sequences, structured routines, and supportive instructional method. All participants in the study will engage in AKT sessions twice weekly, each session lasting 60 minutes, over a period of two months.

Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the participants in terms of their demographic information, primary and secondary outcome measures. Data will be analyzed using repeated-measures models appropriate for a randomized controlled crossover design, examining within-subject changes over time and between-condition effects, while accounting for intervention order. Effect sizes will be reported. Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed by a developmental neurologist with ADHD
  • Age 6-12 years
  • Fluent in Hebrew

Exclusion criteria

  • Comorbidity with another psychiatric or neurological diagnosis, or a developmental syndrome
  • Chronic pain
  • enrolled in a special education system
  • substance abuse (i.e., reporting more than 10 cups of alcohol a week)
  • currently participating in other non-pharmaceutical therapies (e.g., cognitive therapies) started during the past 6 months.

Treatment and study plan

Adapted karate training

Other

Participants will undergo adapted karate training practices, 2 hours weekly for two months, with a karate instructor and an Occupational Therapist specializing in neurodevelopmental disorders, including ADHD.

Primary outcomes

  1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    Time frame: changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a client-centered outcome measure for individuals to identify and prioritize everyday issues that restrict their participation in everyday living.

    Participants will define three goals, and rate their current performance & satisfaction for each goal using a 10-point scale. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

  2. Total number of participants completing the intervention

    Time frame: completing 15 sessions over eight weeks.

    Total number of participants completing the AKT, 15 sessions.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dual Tasking gait analysis

    Time frame: changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    gait analysis (stride and pace) of a one minute walk: first walking only, then walking while doing a cognitive task (following digits via audio and recognizing repeated items).

  2. Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-zoo map)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    A standardized assessment battery that examines executive function in children and adolescents aged 8-16 years. The BADS-C consists of six subtests (adapted and simplified from the BADS) that assess inflexibility, perseverance, novel problem solving, impulsivity, planning, and the ability to utilize feedback in order to moderate behavior. We will use the Zoo map subtest. Raw scores for each of the component subtests can be converted to age-scaled scores, which are adjusted for the child's age and estimated IQ. Age-scaled scores range from 1 to 19, with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3.

  3. The Birthday Task Assessment

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    The Birthday Task Assessment is a performance-based tool assessing executive functions in children aged 8-16, through a simulated daily activity. It includes three progressively complex tasks: wrapping gifts, writing a card, and making sandwiches. Performance is evaluated by sequencing, timing, and rule adherence, with higher error rates indicating greater executive difficulties.

  4. The The Preschool Executive Task Assessment (PETA)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    The The Preschool Executive Task Assessment (PETA) is a performance-based measure assessing executive functioning in young children aged 3-8, through completion of a structured, multi-step task involving assembling a caterpillar picture. Performance is scored based on task completion time and a standardized hierarchy of cues ranging from independent performance to full physical assistance, with higher scores indicating greater reliance on external.

  5. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive function (BRIEF)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    An 86-item questionnaire assessing executive function in everyday environments. The BRIEF is composed of eight clinical scales, which together produce an overall Global Executive Composite (GEC). Based on the past 30 days, items are graded on a 3-point scale: 'never' (1), 'sometimes' (2), or 'always' (3). The raw scores are converted to T-scores which are used to interpret the child's level of executive functioning as reported by parents and/or teachers on the BRIEF rating forms. These scores are linear transformations of the raw scale scores (M = 50, SD = 10).

  6. Short Sensory Profile (SSP 2)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    A 34-item parent screening questionnaire designed to measure behaviors associated with abnormal responses to sensory stimuli in children aged 3.0-14.11 years. Response scale aimed at the frequency the child displays each scenario (item), and scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never = 10% or less) to 5 (almost always = 90% or more). Scores are compiled into a "sensory-processing" domain that directly links with sensory modulation (14 item scale); and a "sensory-behavior" domain that links to behavioral concerns reflective of sensory modulation difficulties (20 item scales). For the sensory processing scale, 32-40 indicates "more than others", 41-70 indicates "much more than others". For behavioral scale, 47-59 indicates "more than others", 60-100 indicates "much more than others".

  7. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale- Parent Report (DERS-P)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    The DERS-P is a 36-item parent report, aimed to assess parental perceptions of adolescent Emotional Dysregulation, measuring six facets of emotion regulation: Awareness (6 items), Clarity (5 items), Goals (5 items), Impulse (6 items), Nonacceptance (6 items), and Strategies (8 items). Items are rated on a scale of 1 ("almost never" 0-10%) to 5 ("almost always" 91-100%). Higher scores indicate greater ED.

  8. Participation In Childhood Occupation (PICO)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    A 30-item instrument which measures the difficulty level, enjoyment, and frequency of performance for children's participation in daily occupations in a variety of environments throughout the day. The parent assesses each activity in all three parameters, with answers ranging from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (much difficulty).

  9. Quality of life in school (QoLS) questionnaire

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    A 36 item questionnaire for elementary school students, which includes statements regarding situations and experiences of a student throughout the school day. The child rates these sentences as true to his experience or not, on a scale of 1-4 (1- never true, 4- always true).

  10. Participation in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (PQ)

    Time frame: Changes in scores between pre (T1-week 0) to T2 (8 weeks later), to T3 (8 weeks post T2).

    The PQ is a parent questionnaire that assesses the extent of a child's engagement in PAs and in sedentary recreational activities. The PQ-Modified, used in this study, includes two of the 12 items from the PQ: (a) the average number of weekly hours that the child engages in various PAs (structured as well as unstructured activities) and (b) the child's PA level compared to his or her peers, rated on a Likert scale (1 ¼ very inactive, 5 ¼ very active).

  11. In-depth semi-structured interview

    Time frame: T3 (8 weeks post T2(8 weeks from baseline)).

    A semi-structured interview, comprising of 2 open-end questions aiming to understand how parents of children with ADHD perceive the contribution of the intervention process to their child. The interview will comprise questions such as What did the intervention program contribute to your child?

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Tami Bar-Shalita, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

972-3-6405447

Yehudit Harris, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

972-52-5931777

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tel Aviv University

Other

Collaborators

  • Assuta Ashdod Hospital
  • Ministry of Health, Israel

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Self-regulation, Social Participation, and Functional Performance in Individuals With ADHD Through Adapted Karate Training: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.