Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02238652

Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy

Improving quality of life (QoL) in residents of nursing homes:

A cluster randomized clinical trial of efficacy - The KOSMOS study.

COSMOS (COmmunication (Advance Care Planning - ACP), Systematic pain assessment and treatment, Medication review, Occupational therapy, and Safety) is a practical intervention aimed to improve clinical and psychiatric challenges in NH patients. The COSMOS intervention combines the most effective research results to improve staff competence and patients' mental health, safety, QoL. We also aim to reduce psychotropic drug use and costs.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Berger Bo og Behandlingssenter, Baerum, Akershus, Norway

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Nursing home (NH) patients have complex mental health problems, disabilities and social needs, compounded by widespread prescription of psychotropic drugs. To preserve their dignity and quality of life is an important goal of our society. This can only be achieved within NHs that offer high competent conditions of treatment and care.

Research questions and hypotheses:

  • Will the implementation of a communication and end-of-life decision making process have impact on interactions between patients, staff and family? We hypothesize that ACP will improve the interactions between patients, staff and family, and satisfaction in relatives and thereby improve the quality of life NH patients.
  • Is the KOSMOS capable to affect agitation and aggression and reduce medication e.g. psychotropics in NH patient? We hypothesize that KOSMOS will significantly reduce agitation and aggression, the total amount of medication, and psychotropic drug use.
  • What combination of interventions will give the broadest benefit, and could be delivered as a routine intervention as part of NH practice? We hypothesize that the comprehensive KOSMOS approach improves QoL and makes positive changes in NH practice.
  • What other types of advantages are expected? We hypothesize that KOSMOS is a cost-effective approach, with potential to increase the safety and reduce mortality in NH patients.

Method: The KOSMOS intervention combines the most effective research results to improve staff competence, and patients' mental health, safety, QoL, and to reduce psychotropic drug use and costs. The efficacy testing of KOSMOS includes systematic literature review, a pilot study, a 9-month randomized control trial (RCT), and a dissemination plan. Data collection will take place at baseline, months 4, and 9. The intervention entails provision of staff training, study guidelines and manuals. NHs will be randomized to either KOSMOS or current best practice. We will include 38 NH long-term-care (LTC) wards (normally just one ward per NH) in Bergen, Stavanger, Oslo/Bærum, Sarpsborg and Sogn and Fjordane. In total 310 patients ≥65 years will be recruited from these wards

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Quality of life in late stage dementia (QUALID), QUALIDEM, EQ-5-D; Neuropsychiatric Inventory - NH edition (NPI-NH); Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Cornell; Mobilization - Observation - Behaviour - Intensity - Dementia 2 (MOBID-2); drug use; drug-related problems, START; STOP; cost-utility analysis (RUD-FOCA); hospital admission; and mortality, ActiWatch; Log registration of NH activities; Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements

Statistical analyses: include characteristics between 2 groups (Chi square, Mann-Whitney U), ANCOVA, ICC and p-values for each time-point and outcomes.

National and international collaboration: National collaboration between researchers at the Universities of Bergen, Oslo, and Stavanger is established. Internationally, colleagues from the EU COST-Action TD1005, Karolinska University, Stockholm and Kings College, London are engaged in this RCT.

Funding: The employment of two PhD-candidates (100%) and one post-doctoral fellow (50%) received funding by the Norwegian Research Council (Sponsor's Protocol Code: 222113) in 2012.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Resident in long time care ward in Bergen, Bærum, Sarpsborg, Kvam, Fjell, Sund, Askøy and Øygarden

Exclusion criteria

  • Dying patients with reduced consciousness at baseline
  • Active Schizophrenia

Treatment and study plan

Communication

Behavioral

A preparation process before the patient become incapable of participating in life prolonging decisions

Other names: advance care planning

Systematic Pain Assessment and Treatment

Behavioral

Assess pain with MOBID-2 Pain Scale and thereby improve pain management in dementia.

Other names: MOBID-2

Medication review

Behavioral

An individual and systematic review of medication prescriptions to identify possible harmful drug effects and to reduce the use of psychotropic drugs.

occupational therapy

Behavioral

Increase individual activities, based on function, personal interest and personality by educating the staff on these elements.

SAFETY

Behavioral

Focusing on developing a culture where staff has an active and constant awareness of how to prevent adverse events and a commitment to safety.

Other names: patient safety

Primary outcomes

  1. Neuropsychiatric symptoms

    Time frame: 9 months

    Depression, anxiety an apathy will be assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version (NPI-NH).

  2. Quality of life

    Time frame: 9 months

    Assessing quality of life by Qualidem, QUALID and EQ-5D.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Activities of daily living

    Time frame: 9 months

    Assessed by ADL index (range 0-18).

  2. Mood or depression

    Time frame: 9 months

    Assessed by Cornell Depression Scale (range 0-38)

  3. Pain

    Time frame: 9 months

    Assessed by Mobilisation-Observation-Behaviour-Intensity-Dementia (MOBID-2) Pain Scale (range 0-10)

  4. Medication review

    Time frame: 9 months

    Use of medication in number of people and dose, especially use of psychotropic drugs

  5. Drug-related problems

    Time frame: 9 months

    number of drug-drug-interactions using interactions database, number of drugs prescribed, number of anticholinergics prescribed, number of patients prescribed pain-medication with no pain on the MOBID-2 pain scale, number of patients with anti depressants with a low cornell depression rating scale in dementia.

  6. Admission to hospital and mortality

    Time frame: 9 months

    Questionnaire asking nurses wether the patient has been admitted to the hospital at month 4 and month 9.

  7. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 9 months

    Resource use will be registered by Resource use in dementia - formal care (RUD-FOCA)

  8. Cost of medication

    Time frame: 9 months

    Cost-utility analysis will be performed

  9. Measure of activity

    Time frame: 9 months

    ActiWatch to register sleep and activity

  10. Nursing home activity

    Time frame: 9 months

    Log registration of NH activities

  11. Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements

    Time frame: 9 months

    Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements with questionary

Other outcomes

  1. Implementation indicators

    Time frame: 9 months

    Assessment of the quality of the implementation on each intervention by monthly visits and phone calls and review of the manuals.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Bergen

Other

Collaborators

  • Helse Stavanger HF
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • King's College London
  • Rebekka Ege Hegemanns legat
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • University of Oslo

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (The KOSMOS Study)

Acronym: KOSMOS

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Sep 12, 2014
Registry last updated
Apr 15, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.