Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05367791

Improving Postural Control Through Innovative Stimulation of the Proprioceptive System

Every movement humans make in everyday life is based on a continuous integration of sensory information. A good interaction between sensory processes and motor control, called sensorimotor integration, is necessary for the efficiency of movements. Sensorimotor integration in the context of posture and walking is based on proprioception. Proprioception is the conscious and unconscious perception of the spatial and mechanical state of the musculoskeletal system. Proprioceptive information transmitted through the neuromuscular spindles in particular is suggested to play a role in motor rehabilitation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

7 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Etienne

Saint-Etienne, 42055, France

About this study

This is particularly important when considering populations with impaired proprioception resulting in impaired posture and gait control. This is particularly the case for older adults and children with cerebral palsy (CP). Nevertheless, drastic differences exist between the two populations in the nature of these alterations: stable (children with CP) vs. progressive (older adults); brain lesion/upper motor neuron (children with CP) vs. processing deficits and peripheral sensory degradation (older adults); growing (children with CP) vs. fully developed individuals (older adults). However, both populations can improve their postural control with postural exercise programmes. In humans, the proprioceptive system can also be stimulated non-invasively by mechanical vibrations applied to tendons or muscles (localised vibration; LV), or by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (somatosensory electrical stimulation; SES). As a result, chronically applied SES can improve sensorimotor function in healthy adults and some clinical cohorts. Similarly, a 6-week weight-bearing and weight-shifting training programme combined with LV has been reported to provide improved benefits in postural control, again in stroke patients.The greater improvement in motor function when LV or SES is added to active muscles may reflect an adjuvant effect: the sensory signal from LV or SES stimulation is integrated with the sensory signals from the task being performed, thus acting as an associative conditioning of the proprioceptive system, and leading to improved sensorimotor integration. The present project aims to study the effectiveness of a short-term intervention combining postural exercises with LV, SES, or the combination of both.

In particular, this study will focus on the effects of these interventions on proprioception, postural control and walking in children with CP and older adults.Confirmation of hypotheses will open up new avenues for rehabilitation therapies and preventive interventions, and may be extended to other purposes and clinical populations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Older Adults:

  • Affiliated or beneficiaries of a social security plan
  • Who have freely given their written consent after having been informed of the purpose, the procedure and the potential risks involved

Children with Cerebral Palsy:

  • Children between the ages of 7 and 18 years, diagnosed with Spastic Cerebral Palsy, presenting with a clinical picture of infantile cerebral hemiplegia or diplegia.
  • Children able to understand and follow the simple instructions of the examination
  • Children walking GMFCS (Gross Motor Functional Classification system) I to II.
  • Children with at least one parent and the child having given and signed the consent agreement
  • Children who are members or beneficiaries of a social security system

Exclusion criteria

Older adults:

  • Pathology or surgery resulting in a locomotor disorder, within 6 months prior to the study,
  • Chronic neurological, motor or psychological pathologies
  • Use of neuro-active substances likely to alter cortico-spinal excitability (hypnotics, anti-epileptics, psychotropic drugs, muscle relaxants) during the study.
  • Contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation:
  • Cardiac or respiratory insufficiency.
  • Wearing a cardiac pace maker.
  • Wearing a heart valve and severe cardiovascular diseases.
  • Presence of prosthetic material or ferromagnetic foreign bodies in the head.
  • Presence of cochlear implants or ocular prosthetic material.
  • History of neurosurgical procedures.
  • Neurological diseases that may affect brain structures and cognitive abilities (e.g., intracranial tumor, multiple sclerosis, history of stroke or head injury).
  • Participation at the same time in another interventional trial or having participated in a such a study within 30 days prior to this study.
  • Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30.0 kg/m²)

Children with cerebral palsy:

  • Children with concomitant muscle disease (e.g., myopathy...).
  • Children who have received a baclofen injection in the 6 months preceding the evaluation.
  • Children who have undergone neuro-orthopedic surgery on the lower limbs within the last 6 months
  • Children who have received a botulinum toxin injection within the last 6 months
  • Children participating in therapeutic programs other than their usual physical therapy sessions.

Treatment and study plan

POSTUR

Other

Training sessions without any stimulation

Localised Vibration

Other

Training sessions with localized vibration

Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation

Other

Training sessions with somatosensory electrical stimulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of body balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Time frame: Change from Week 8 to Week 16

    Variation of postural control

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of body balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Variation of postural control

  2. Evaluation of the displacement of the center of pressure with force platform in centimeter

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Variation of postural control

  3. Displacement of the centrer of pressure with application of localized vibration in centimeter

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Proprioceptive contribution to postural control

  4. Measure of the angular position error in degrees

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Variation of the position direction

  5. Coefficient of variation muscle force control in percent

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Muscle force control measurement

  6. Measure 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in meters

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Walking ability evaluation

  7. Measure Timed Up & Go Test (TUG) in seconds

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Walking ability evaluation

  8. Measure 10 meter walk test (10MWT) in seconds

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Walking ability evaluation

  9. Quantifying corticospinal excitability with motor evoked potentials in milliVolt

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Underlying neural adaptations evaluation in older adults only

  10. Quantifying spinal excitability with H-reflex in milliVolt

    Time frame: Change from Week 1 to Week 22

    Underlying neural adaptations evaluation in older adults only

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Other

Registry information

Acronym: IMPULSES

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 10, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 29, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.