Endobronchial Valve
DeviceEndoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Zephyr Endobronchial Valve
NCT Number: NCT02025205
The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled, one-way crossover study is to assess and compare the efficacy of the Zephyr endobronchial valves vs. Standard of Care (SoC) in patients suffering from COPD with Homogeneous Emphysema. Patients will be followed up for 12 months after randomization. Patients in the SoC arm will crossover to the EBV treatment arm after the 6-month visit and will be followed up for 6 additional months.The primary objective is the variation of FEV1 between baseline and 3-month follow-up visit. The secondary objectives will evaluate quality of life, exercise capacity, dyspnea (including BODE index) changes, target lobe volume reduction, as well as safety outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für COPD und Pneumologische Epidemiologie, Vienna, Austria
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Zephyr Endobronchial Valve
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Percentage change in FEV1 at 3 months relative to Baseline in the EBV group, compared to the SoC group.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Target Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) was evaluated by quantitative analysis of HRCT scans at Baseline and at 3-months post-valve placement to measure the target lobe volume.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Target Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) was evaluated by quantitative analysis of HRCT scans at Baseline and at 3-months post-valve placement to measure the target lobe volume.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
The threshold of TLVR ≥350 mL was used to determine the proportion of subjects that achieved this amount of TLVR in the EBV group.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
The mean absolute change in FEV1(L) relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
The mean absolute change in FEV1(% Predicted) relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in Residual Volume relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean percent change in Residual Volume relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Percent predicted change in RV relative to Baseline at 3 months between the EBV and SoC groups
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in the 6MWD from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SOC
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean percent change in the 6MWD from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SOC
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire Total Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean percent change in the SGRQ Total Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. The mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) stratifies severity of dyspnea in respiratory diseases. The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more limitations.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean percent change in the mMRC Dyspnea Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. The mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) stratifies severity of dyspnea in respiratory diseases. The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more limitations.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group.
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an eight-item questionnaire designed to quantify the impact of COPD symptoms on the health status of patients. The CAT provides a score of 0-40 to indicate the impact of disease.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an eight-item questionnaire designed to quantify the impact of COPD symptoms on the health status of patients. The CAT provides a score of 0-40 to indicate the impact of disease. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in the EQ-5D Summary Index from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group.
EQ-5D is a standardized instrument to measure health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The EQ-5D consists of a descriptive system and the EQ VAS.
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D health states may be converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches weights to each of the levels in each dimension. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, while 0 indicates the worst health state.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean percent change in EQ-5D Summary Index from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group.
Time frame: At baseline and after 3 months
Mean absolute change in the EQ-5D VAS (Health State Today) Score from Baseline to 3 months in the EBV group compared to the SoC group. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Pulmonx International Sàrl
Industry
A Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, One-way Crossover Investigation of Endobronchial Valve (EBV) Therapy vs. Standard of Care (SoC) in Homogeneous Emphysema
Acronym: IMPACT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.