Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04149457

Improving Neurological Health in Aging Via Neuroplasticity-based Computerized Exercise

This study is a validation study to evaluate efficacy of a neuroplasticity-based, computerized cognitive training program INHANCE (Improving Neurological Health in Aging via Neuroplasticity-based Computerized Exercise) to improve neurological and neuropsychological health in older adults.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

McGill University

Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada

About this study

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a targeted speed and alertness training program (INHANCE) to improve cognition in healthy older adults, as evidenced by standard measures of cognition, and positive improvements in the neuromodulatory cholinergic system as measured via positron-emission tomography (PET).

The investigators will employ a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial design comprised of a treatment group using INHANCE, a computerized program that trains speed of processing and attention, compared to an active control group using computer games in 92 healthy older adults.

Approximately 108 participants will be consented to ensure the successful completion of 92 participants (post 20% attrition). Participants will then complete the Screening (V0) assessments to determine eligibility. Following inclusion, participants will complete the Baseline (V1) assessments, PET imaging and structural MRI scan; participants will then be randomized into either the INHANCE training or Computer Games, and will engage in approximately 35 hours of program use for the 10-week intervention period. Approximately halfway through the intervention period (~5 weeks), participants will complete Interim (V2) assessments to be compared to the Post-Intervention assessments. Following the 10-week intervention, participants will complete a Post-Intervention (V3) assessment and PET imaging to evaluate changes in cognitive function. Participants will then stop using their assigned program for 3 months and return for a Follow-up (V4) end-of-study assessment to evaluate the endurance of changes in cognitive function in the absence of further program use.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Potential participant must be 65+ years old at the time of study screening.
  • Potential participant should achieve a score of ≥ 23 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
  • Potential participant must be likely able to compete all primary outcome measures in the judgment of the consenting study staff person.
  • Potential participant must demonstrate adequate decisional capacity, in the judgment of the consenting study staff member, to make a choice about participating in this research study.
  • Potential participant must have the visual, auditory, and motors capacity to use the computerized intervention in the judgment of the consenting study staff person.
  • Potential participant must already have, be willing to obtain, or be willing to travel to locations with WiFi connectivity to complete intervention activities.
  • Potential participant must be able to communicate in either English or French.

Exclusion criteria

  • Potential participant should not have an existing diagnosis of major or minor neurocognitive disorder at screening.
  • Potential participants with active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent or suicide-related behaviors within 2 months of consent as measured by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
  • Potential participant should not have a Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score of >10.
  • Potential participant should not have been treated within 5 years of the date of consent with a computer-based cognitive training program manufactured by Posit Science.
  • Potential participant should not be participating in a concurrent clinical trial (involving an investigational pharmaceutical, behavioral treatment, medical device or other) that, in the judgment of the Site Principal Investigator, could affect the outcome of this study.
  • Potential participant may not be pregnant and should not have claustrophobia or implantation with any medical devices above the waist that may concentrate radio frequency fields, or have other medical issues that may frustrate participation in MRI imaging procedures.
  • Potential participant should not have medical illnesses deemed to interfere with participation in study activities and/or unstable and/or untreated conditions that may affect cognition, including substance abuse/dependence disorders, drugs that interfere with cholinergic function, ongoing chemotherapy or other cancer treatment.
  • Potential participant who shows signs of intoxication due to current substance abuse (including alcohol and/or illegal drugs) will be excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Computerized plasticity-based adaptive cognitive training

Other

Thirty minutes of training on computerized exercises that targets visual processing speed, memory, attention and alertness.

Commercially available computerized training

Other

Thirty minutes of training on computerized, casual video games.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change Mean in FEOBV SUVR (Standardized Uptake Value Ratio) Through PET Imaging in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

    Time frame: At 3 months (post-intervention)

    Change from baseline and 3 months (post-intervention) for the 18F-fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol (FEOBV) standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex as measured through Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ligand imaging. Higher score is better.

Other outcomes

  1. Change Mean in EXAMINER Executive Composite Score

    Time frame: At 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up)

    The EXAMINER (Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research) is a computer-based battery of executive function tests yielding a single Executive Composite score across three subtests (Flanker, Anti-Saccades, Set-Shifting). The Executive Composite is a latent trait estimate using Empirical Bayes scoring from item-response theory and is therefore unitless and unbounded. For reference, validation studies report mean scores of 0.70 in healthy adults, 0.29 in patients with mild cognitive impairment, and -0.20 in patients with Alzheimer's disease. This outcome reports change in Executive Composite Score from baseline, calculated as the score at 3 months minus baseline and the score at 6 months minus baseline. Higher values indicate better executive functioning.

  2. Change Mean Score in Useful Field of View (UFOV) Assessment

    Time frame: At 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up)

    This is a computerized assessment that serves as a positive control for task learning. Raw scores are defined as the exposure duration at approximately 80% criterion accuracy in milliseconds accuracy in identification of central and peripheral targets. The best possible raw score is 32 milliseconds, and the worst possible score is 3162 milliseconds. Change was calculated as the score at 3 months minus the score at baseline, and as the score at 6 months minus the score at baseline. Lower values in milliseconds reflect better Useful Field of View performance.

  3. Change Mean Target Frequency Level in Tonic and Phasic Alertness (TAPAT) Assessment

    Time frame: At 3 months (post-intervention) and at 6 months (follow-up)

    This is a computerized assessment that serves as a positive control for task learning. A single target frequency level required for users to achieve at least 80% accuracy in target and foil identification for a pre-specified target image presented among similar foil images. Target frequency level is recorded as an integer ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 corresponded to the easiest condition (40% target frequency among foils) and 7 represented the most challenging condition (10% target frequency among foils). Change was calculated as the score at 3 months minus the score at baseline, and as the score at 6 months minus the score at baseline. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Posit Science Corporation

Industry

Collaborators

  • McGill University
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Neurological Health in Aging Via Neuroplasticity-based Computerized Exercise (INHANCE)

Acronym: INHANCE

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Nov 4, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.