Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02274844

Improving Medication Adherence in the Alabama Black Belt

Medication adherence is especially critical in regions like rural Alabama, where residents have among the worst health outcomes in the US. This project was designed in collaboration with our community member partners and builds on a 5-year partnership of community-engaged research on diabetes peer coaching interventions and our experience with peer storytelling. The investigators will test the hypothesis that an intervention designed within the Corbin and Strauss framework can improve adherence and health outcomes compared to usual care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35210, United States

About this study

Improving medication adherence is one of the greatest challenges in modern medicine. Despite decades of research on the topic, as many as half of patients with chronic diseases are not taking medications as recommended, and costs of nonadherence have been estimated at $290 billion annually. One reason for this persistent finding could be that interventions rarely acknowledge medications within the larger context of the lived experience of illness. Drawing on hundreds of patient interviews, Corbin and Strauss showed that chronic illness is a fundamentally destabilizing influence that forces us to confront the potential limitations of our "new", chronically ill self. Accepting our illness may be a crucial step in embracing medication adherence and other self-management behaviors as ways to restore balance following this disruption. The Corbin and Strauss framework is not often used to develop and test interventions to improve medication adherence, and this is the central objective of this proposal.

Medication adherence is especially critical in regions like rural Alabama, where residents have among the worst health outcomes in the US. Rates of cardiovascular mortality, diabetes and obesity are very high, but resources are scarce and the area's predominately black residents have deep-seated mistrust of the healthcare system (the region includes Tuskegee, site of the infamous syphilis study). This project was designed in collaboration with our community member partners and builds on a 5-year partnership of community-engaged research on diabetes peer coaching interventions and our experience with peer storytelling. The investigators will test the hypothesis that an intervention designed within the Corbin and Strauss framework can improve adherence and health outcomes compared to usual care. Our Aims are:

Aim 1: With our community partners, using qualitative research methods, build on already developed culturally tailored education material to develop the medication adherence intervention. The intervention will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching. Activities include conducting focus groups with patients; creating the DVDs and the coaching intervention protocol; training peer coaches; and pilot testing.

Aim 2: Conduct a randomized controlled trial with 500 individuals with type 2 diabetes and medication nonadherence. The trial will compare the effect of usual care and the intervention on medication adherence and physiologic risk factors including A1c, blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (primary outcomes), and quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary outcomes).

This innovative approach would be a major shift in how patients are helped in under resourced areas living with chronic diseases commit to taking medications, improving health and eventually reducing health disparities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults
  • type 2 diabetes
  • taking medications for diabetes
  • medication non adherent

Exclusion criteria

  • nursing home residence
  • plans to move away in the next year
  • advanced illnesses such as hemodialysis, cancer or dementia

Treatment and study plan

Living Well with Diabetes Program

Behavioral

The intervention participants will receive the Living Well with Diabetes Program. The program will consist of educational DVDs with integrated storytelling about how community members accepted their disease and overcame barriers to medication adherence, plus one-on-one telephonic peer coaching

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Self Reported Medication Adherence

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Patient-reported adherence to medications as a medication adherence score, from 0-3, where a higher score indicates worse adherence.

  2. Change in Percentage of HbA1c

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Hemoglobin A1c test to identify the average amount of glucose (sugar) present in a patient's blood.

  3. Change in Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    2 BP measures were taken 1 minute apart using a LifeSource UA-789 digital blood pressure monitor.

  4. Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Finger stick, spectrophotometer to measure cholesterol level.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life as Assessed With the Short Form 12- Mental Component

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Short Form-12 Mental Component and Physical Component Summary scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.

  2. Change in Quality of Life as Assessed With the Short Form-12- Physical Component

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Short Form-12 Mental Component and Physical Component Summary scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.

  3. Change in Medication Use Self-efficacy Score as Measured by SEAMS Scale and the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale, Which is Associated With A1c

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Medication use self-efficacy scores for range from 13-39; higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy for medication adherence.

  4. Change in Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Diabetes specific quality of life will be assessed using the validated Diabetes Distress Scale.The DDS is a 17-item instrument that measures diabetes-related emotional distress. Participants rate the degree to which each item is problematic for them on a 6-point Likert scale, from 1 (no problem) to 6 (serious problem). A score of 3 or greater = moderate distress.

  5. Number of Physician Office Visits 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Number of Hospital Stays at 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Number of Emergency Visits at 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Change in Diabetes Medication Counts

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Change in number of diabetes medications.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Medication Beliefs- Harm (Beliefs That Medications Are Harmful)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.

  2. Change in Medication Beliefs- Overuse (Concerns About the Way Doctors Use Medications)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.

  3. Change in Medication Beliefs-Necessity (Beliefs About the Necessity of Medications)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.

  4. Change in Medication Beliefs- Concerns (Concerns About the Negative Effects of Medications)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

    Beliefs about medications questionnaire scores range from 5-25; higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 24, 2014
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.