Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03684551

Improving Community Health Worker Performance With a Supervision Dashboard

Countries across sub-Saharan Africa are scaling up Community Health Worker (CHW) programmes, yet there remains little high-quality research assessing strategies for CHW supervision and performance improvement. This randomised controlled trial aims to determine the effect of a personalised performance dashboard used as a supervision tool on the quantity, speed, and quality of CHW care. This study is a randomised controlled trial in a large health catchment area in peri-urban Mali. One hundred forty-eight CHWs conducting proactive case-finding home visits were randomly allocated to receive individual monthly supervision with or without the CHW Performance Dashboard from January to June 2016. Randomisation was stratified by CHW supervisor, level of CHW experience, and CHW baseline performance for monthly quantity of care (number of household visits). With regression analysis, we used a difference-in-difference model to estimate the effect of the intervention on monthly quantity, timeliness (percentage of children under five treated within 24 hours of symptom onset), and quality (percentage of children under five treated without protocol error) of care over a six-month post-intervention period relative to a three-month pre-intervention period.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be a CHW in the study site at the time of enrolment (n=148)

Exclusion criteria

  • CHW who pretested the Dashboard tool (n=2)

Treatment and study plan

The CHW-led health system

Other

During the study period, all CHWs, regardless of treatment arm, performed proactive case detection, the process of conducting at least two hours per day of door-to-door home visits to proactively identify - through health history inquiry and/or disease diagnostics - patients who need care. For all patients identified, CHWs provided doorstep counselling, evaluation, diagnostics, treatment, referral to appropriate health facilities, and follow-up. CHWs provided care in the community without user fees, and were able to refer patients to the reinforced government primary health centres for care without user fees as well. CHWs were residents of the communities they served, and they were required to be available at home or by phone for consultation at any time.

The CHW Supervision model

Other

CHWs in both study arms received monthly individual supervisory sessions and weekly group supervisory sessions from their dedicated CHW supervisor. An individual monthly session of 360 Supervision included: (i) solicitation of patient perspectives of CHW care; (ii) direct observation of CHW doorstep care; and (iii) a one-on-one feedback discussion with or without the CHW Performance Dashboard depending on treatment arm.

The CHW Performance Dashboard

Other

The CHW Performance Dashboard was a graphic display of a CHW's performance along three indicators defined as follows: (i) "Quantity" of care: the number of homes visited during the month; (ii) "Timeliness" of care: the percentage of sick children under five treated within 24 hours of symptom onset during the month; (iii) "Quality" of care: the percentage of sick children under five treated without protocol error among 23 potential errors during the month. The Dashboard displayed an individual CHW's quantity, timeliness, and quality of care indicators from the previous month, using absolute numbers, percentages, and visual graphics, alongside those of the highest performing CHW. During the individual supervisory feedback session, this personalised and relative (to the highest performer) quantitative performance feedback helped orient the discussion of strengths and weaknesses, and allowed the CHW to see quantitatively and visually how his/her performance fared the previous month.

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantity of care

    Time frame: 9 months

    The number of proactive case-finding home visits during the month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Timeliness of care

    Time frame: 9 months

    The percentage of sick children under five treated within 24 hours of symptom onset during the month

  2. Quality of care

    Time frame: 9 months

    The percentage of sick children under five treated without protocol error among 23 potential errors during the month

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ari Johnson, MD

Other

Collaborators

  • Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
  • Malaria Research and Training Center, Bamako, Mali
  • Malian Ministry of Health and Public Hygiene
  • Medic Mobile, San Francisco, USA
  • Muso, Bamako Mali and San Francisco USA
  • University of California, San Francisco

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Community Health Worker Performance by Using a Personalised Feedback Dashboard for Supervision: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Sep 25, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.