University of Pittsburgh / Rehab Neural Engineering Labs
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219, United States
NCT Number: NCT06294834
The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of remote manual wheelchair skills training program for clinicians. The study will use three-group approach: intervention with remote feedback (Group 1), control group (Group 2), and structured self-study (Group 3). This demonstrates how the intervention compares not only to a control, but also to the next "best alternative" - therapists sourcing web-based training materials and learning independently.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219, United States
A randomized, single-blinded, two-period cross-over study design for Groups 1 and 2 will be used. Participants will complete baseline assessments and then be randomized to either Group 1 or Group 2. After enrollment for Groups 1 and 2 is completed, Group 3 participants will be enrolled.
Group 1 will receive the active intervention (intervention A) which will include a two-part training in wheelchair skills. For Part 1, they will review approximately 4 hours of educational videos on how to complete and teach wheelchair skills. For Part 2 they will complete a practice-feedback loop with a remote trainer providing asynchronous feedback. Group 3 will mirror Group 1 but complete only Part 1 of the training. Group 2 will receive the control intervention (intervention B) participants will review approximately 4 hours of educational videos. Participants will have 8 weeks to complete either training program. Both groups will then complete follow-up at 2 and 6 months. Following this, participants will cross over to receive the other intervention (Group 1 and 3 will receive intervention B, Group 2 will receive intervention A) and complete follow-up at 8 and 12 months.
Additionally, rehabilitation professionals who are not therapists will be able to access the training through a structured self-study (Group 4). This group will receive access to both trainings with follow-up at 2 and 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Clinicians will review a suite of training videos in a prescribed order that discuss motor learning principles, safe spotting, and how to complete 15 intermediate and advanced skills:
Participants will practice of wheelchair skills paired with remote feedback. Participants will be reminded to practice once per week. The participant will practice any number of the 15 skills for a self-selected duration. Following each practice session, the participant will upload video(s) of the skills practiced and a session log, indicating any difficulties they encountered. The remote trainer will then review the video-recordings and reply to the participant with feedback.
Participants will be provided with access to web-based wheelchair provision education modules. When the content is viewed will be self-selected by participants. Participants will be asked to complete a feedback survey at the end of the modules. Participants will receive weekly reminders to complete the intervention until a feedback survey completed.
Time frame: baseline vs. 2 months
Clinician capacity and confidence to complete wheelchair skills, as measured by wheelchair skills test questionnaire (WST-Q), will improve following training (Group 1,3) compared to the active control group (Group 2). The WST-Q includes values from 0-3 for each of Capacity, Confidence, and Performance. These three scores will be averaged. A higher value indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: baseline vs. 2 months
Clinician confidence to provide wheelchair skills training, as measured by the Self-Efficacy on Assessing, Training, and Spotting (SEATS), will improve following training (Group 1,3) compared to the active control group (Group 2). The SEATS evaluation rates Assessing, Training, and Spotting, on scales from 0-5 for each skill. The values will be combined and averaged to assess progress over time. A higher score indicates improvement.
Time frame: baseline vs. 6 months
Clinician training of wheelchair users will increase in quantity (number of wheelchair users trained, duration of training) in the six months following training (Group 1,3) compared to the active control group (Group 2).
Time frame: baseline vs. 6 months
Clinician training of wheelchair users will increase in quality (number of wheelchair skills trained, capacity of trainees) in the year following training (Group 1,3) compared to the active control group (Group 2).
Time frame: baseline vs. 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year (Group 1,3 only) following training
Rehabilitation professional capacity and confidence to complete wheelchair skills, as measured by wheelchair skills test questionnaire (WST-Q), will improve following training. The WST-Q includes values from 0-3 for each of Capacity, Confidence, and Performance. These three scores will be averaged. A higher value indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: baseline vs. 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year (Group 1,3 only) following training
Rehabilitation professional confidence to provide wheelchair skills training, as measured by the Self-Efficacy on Assessing, Training, and Spotting (SEATS), will improve following training. The SEATS evaluation rates Assessing, Training, and Spotting, on scales from 0-5 for each skill. The values will be combined and averaged to assess progress over time. A higher score indicates improvement.
Time frame: baseline vs. 6 months, and 1 year (Group 1,3 only) following training
Rehabilitation professional training of wheelchair users will increase in quantity (number of wheelchair users trained, duration of training) following training.
Time frame: baseline vs. 6 months, and 1 year (Group 1,3 only) following training
Rehabilitation professional training of wheelchair users will increase in quality (number of wheelchair skills trained, capacity of trainees) in the year following training.
University of Pittsburgh
Other
Acronym: SKILL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04736849
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05563402
Ataxia, Autoimmune Diseases
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05432999
Central Nervous System Diseases, Muscle Hypertonia
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07250243
Amputation, Arthritis
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details