Financial counseling and navigation
BehavioralPatients who screen positive for financial toxicity on the 2-question screener tool, will be referred to available counseling or navigation resources available at each site.
NCT Number: NCT07664436
Screening and referral program to proactively identify financial hardship in adult patients with cancer and connect those at-risk with education, counseling, and resources. Patients with cancer will be screened as part of routine care and referred to available resources at their institution, following the referral processes developed and mapped in Aim 1.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, United States
In Aim 1, we will interview up to 30 clinical leaders and front-line staff across the two healthcare systems and community-based practices to understand workflows and opportunities for I-ACCESS integration. Assessment constructs will focus on understanding structural characteristics (including information technology infrastructure), available resources, culture, compatibility, relational connections, communications, and access to knowledge. These data will inform the creation of tailored process maps to outline processes and procedures to prepare each site for I-ACCESS implementation and elucidate when, how, and by whom I-ACCESS screening should be done.
In Aim 2, we will implement I-ACCESS as part of routine clinical practice for eight months at each site. Using a pre-/post-approach, we will examine whether I-ACCESS screening increases the number of financial counseling and oncology social work referrals (primary outcome). We will also examine counseling dispositions, receipt of services among those referred to financial support, and the predictive accuracy of the screening tool (secondary outcomes).
In Aim 3, we will analyze approximately 225 patient and 25 clinician surveys, informed by the Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model, to gather feedback on I-ACCESS delivery, procedures, and barriers/facilitators to implementation. Based upon survey findings, we will then focus on key implementation determinants and outcomes through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with up to 40 stakeholders. Stakeholders will include patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, financial counselors, clinical support staff, and hospital administration at participating clinical sites.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients who screen positive for financial toxicity on the 2-question screener tool, will be referred to available counseling or navigation resources available at each site.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 months.
Ratio of the number of completed screens to the number of eligible patients
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 months.
Ratio of the number of patients referred to counseling to the number of patients screened positive for financial distress
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 months.
Count/percent of reason for referral (out-of-pocket costs, non-medical expense, benefit counseling, medication cost, other)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 months.
Count/percent of counseling disposition (general, insurance, external referral, other)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 months.
Count/percent of external referrals (including, but not limited to, foundation/charity support, local non-medical expense resources)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 months.
Count/percent of external referrals (including, but not limited to, foundation/charity support, local non-medical expense resources)
Time frame: From enrollment through the end of data analysis at 12 months
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of tool vs. documented bill-paying challenges
Time frame: 4-6 months after implementation of I-ACCESS
Patient and clinician perception of intervention acceptability
Time frame: 4-6 months after implementation of I-ACCESS
Patient and clinician perception of intervention appropriateness
Time frame: 4-6 months after intervention completion
Patient and clinician perception of intervention feasibility
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Acronym: I-ACCESS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07410689
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04766190
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06461780
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT03676920
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details