Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06275867

Improved Access to Quality Care and Healthcare Use

This study is an individual-level randomised controlled trial which looks at the effect of providing free access to higher quality providers in urban South Africa. The study will recruit about 1,500 individuals with a child aged 5 or under. They will be randomly allocate to a control group (CONTROL) with the default free access to government facilities or one of the two treatment groups where they will have free access to private providers located either relatively close (CONVENIENT) by or relatively far (INCONVENIENT). The primary outcomes be overuse and underuse of healthcare services for children under 5

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 month–6 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

HDSS Soweto clusters

Soweto, Gauteng, South Africa

About this study

In many low-income settings, provision of social services by the public sector is plagued by problems of quality and low accountability to users. As a result, low expected benefits or fear of neglect by service providers may delay the use of needed services, even when those are free.

In South Africa, the health system is characterised by stark inequalities, with most of the population only able to seek care in free government facilities. The low quality of the public sector, where patients wait long times to be seen by nurses, is believed to lead many to delay needed care and prevent health outcome improvement. The government of South Africa is developing proposals to introduce a national health insurance scheme that would provide free access to private providers who deliver higher care quality. However, concerns about the unequal geographical distribution of private providers raise questions about the potential benefits of the reform. This study asks several questions to inform this reform:

  • Does access to higher-quality care reduce under-use of services for children but also increase overuse?
  • Does access to higher-quality care lead to improved health knowledge of parents and better health outcomes for children?
  • Are these effects mitigated by the distance to the contracted providers? A randomised controlled trial is used to answer these questions. The study will recruit about 1,500 individuals who are the primary caregiver of at least one child aged six or under. and randomly allocate them to a control group (CONTROL) with the default free access to government facilities or one of the two treatment groups where they will have free access to private providers located either relatively close (CONVENIENT) by or relatively far (INCONVENIENT).

The primary outcomes will be the proportion of visits that are considered unnecessary (overuse) and the number of days of illness where care-seeking is recommended by guidelines but not sought by the child's parent or guardian.

Secondary outcomes will include (1) the number of days with ill-health symptoms; (2) out-of-pocket expenditures; (3) health knowledge of parents; (4) subjective and (5) objective measures of child's health.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • parent has a child aged under 6 years old and over 2 months old

Exclusion criteria

  • is planning to move out of the area in the next 3 months
  • has private medical aid

Treatment and study plan

Free high-quality care

Other

Participants are able to take their child to receive free consultations and treatment in a network of contracted private healthcare providers.

Close distance

Other

The network of contracted providers is located close to where participants live.

Far distance

Other

The network of contracted providers is located far to where participants live.

Primary outcomes

  1. Underuse

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    number of days of illness where care-seeking is recommended by guidelines but not sought by the child's parent or guardian

  2. Overuse

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    proportion of primary health care visits that are considered unnecessary

Secondary outcomes

  1. Illness duration

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    number of days with ill-health symptoms

  2. Out-of-pocket expenditures

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Direct (consultations, drugs) and indirect (transport) expenditures spent on health care

  3. Health knowledge

    Time frame: Endline survey (i.e. 12 weeks approximately after the start of the intervention)

    Index of knowledge of parents in relation to preventive and curative care. Parents will answer as series of knowledge questions relative to care-seeking patterns for children (with correct and incorrect responses). For each individual, a score will be computing by adding up all of the correct responses (1 point per correct response, 0 for incorrect), so a higher score will reflect a better knowledge.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

London School of Economics and Political Science

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Access to Higher-quality Care Services on Health-seeking Patterns

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Feb 23, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 15, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.