Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging & Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108-1225, United States
NCT Number: NCT02778971
The main purpose of this study is to explore the impact of an amyloid positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scan on physician diagnosis and management, including drug management and care practices, for patients with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment. This study also intends to capture specific patient-reported outcomes related to patient burden, confidence and satisfaction.
The hypothesis is that to aid early diagnosis, individuals with a diagnostically uncertain etiology for their dementia will benefit from knowledge of amyloid plaque burden status, through an alteration of patient diagnosis and management, which will lead to significant changes in patient and care partner reported outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–90 year
All sexes
Observational
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108-1225, United States
The primary purpose of this prospective, observational study is to examine the benefit of [18F]Flutemetamol PET/CT scan in clinical practice for early diagnosis of cognitive impairment and identifying Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. To accomplish this, when a clinician has ordered an amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan, the investigators will assess the impact of [18F]Flutemetamol PET/CT scans on 1) physician diagnosis and management as it relates to care practices and drug management, and 2) patient reported outcomes in patients evaluated in the Cognitive Disorders Clinic at the University of Utah and meeting Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for clinical amyloid PET/CT scans. A secondary purpose is to compare the semi-quantitative assessment of amyloid plaque burden using vendor supplied software and standard visual assessment of amyloid positivity.
The primary hypothesis is that, in diagnostically uncertain cases, knowledge of amyloid status as determined by amyloid PET/CT scans may alter patient diagnosis and management and lead to significant changes in patient and family reported outcomes. A secondary hypothesis is that vendor supplied semi-quantitative assessment of amyloid plaque positivity will be superior to standard visual criteria assessments.
Aims:
Aim 1: To assess the change in diagnosis and management including both care practices and drug management of adult patients being evaluated for cognitive deficits and meeting Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC).
Aim 2: To assess the change of amyloid PET/CT scans on patient-reported outcomes involving care partner confidence and satisfaction.
Aim 3: To assess the confidence of visual interpretation by using vendor supplied semi-quantitative software to assess amyloid plaque burden.
Hypotheses to be Tested - Synopsis The hypothesis is that to aid early diagnosis, individuals with a diagnostically uncertain etiology for their dementia will benefit from knowledge of amyloid plaque burden status through an alteration of patient diagnosis and management, which will lead to significant changes in patient and care partner reported outcomes.
Aim 1
Aim 2
Aim 3:
This study will use [18F]Flutemetamol-PET imaging to assess and quantify the amyloid plaque burden in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of unclear etiology, according to Diagnostic Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV) and/or National Institutes of Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria, verified by a dementia specialist within 24 months.
The [18F]Flutemetamol-PET scans of these study participants will then be assessed using a General Electric (GE) software databases (NeuroMarQ) which contain scan data from healthy control individuals to evaluate for abnormalities in amyloid plaque burden differing from the values expected for individuals in their age range.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
amyloid PET imaging with [18F]Flutemetamol and subsequent modification of diagnosis and management
Other names: Vizamyl
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
% of 13 care practices that differ before and after the amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
% of drug management options that differ before and after the amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
Difference in % of AD likelihood identified before and after the amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
% of leading diagnosis that differ before and after amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
Difference in a 5-point scale of physician confidence in leading diagnosis before and after amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
Difference in a 5-point scale of care partner confidence in diagnosis before and after amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
Difference in a 5-point scale of care partner satisfaction before team care and after amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 1, 30 days prior to scan and Visit 4, 90 days after scan
Difference in a 5-point scale of care partner quality before team care and after amyloid PET scan
Time frame: Visit 4, 90 days after scan
Proportion of care partners indicating they would agree to do an amyloid PET again on a yes/no/don't know scale
Time frame: at each visit, visits1-4, 120 days
% of patients showing a difference in the 44-point Catastrophic Reaction Scale between the median value in all non-scan visits and the value in the amyloid PET scan visit
Time frame: Visit 1, Visit 3, 60 days
% of patients showing a difference in the 44-point Catastrophic Reaction Scale between Visit 1 and Visit 3 when learning the result of the scan
Time frame: Visit 4 90 days post scan
% of care practices recommended after amyloid PET scan reported by care partner
Time frame: Visit 4 90 days post scan
% of drug management options recommended after amyloid PET scan reported by care partner
Time frame: within 30 days post amyloid PET scan
Difference in a 5-point measure of amyloid scan positivity between a qualitative and semi-quantitative image analysis
University of Utah
Other
Acronym: IMPACT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04426539
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04445831
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Helsinki, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT02420756
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01699503
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial Details