Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05294159

Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals

This is a 12-month, dual arm, phase 4, open-label, multi-centre study examining the implementation of LA intra-muscular (IM) drugs in clinics and decentralised community-based settings in the UK.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) LA, is recommended in European US and British guidelines as a treatment for HIV-1 that allows PWH to receive a two-monthly injectable treatment, rather than daily pills. Providing injectable therapy in a system designed to provide and manage patients on oral treatments poses logistical challenges namely how resources are used to accommodate patient preference within a constrained health economy with capacity limitations. Exploring the use of alternative settings for injection, including community-based settings to deliver CAB+RPV LA, has the potential to expand options and potentially improve clinic capacity. Many PWH report high levels of stigma when attending the HIV clinic which can affect engagement with care, so receiving care in a community setting may provide additional choices and the possibility of receiving treatment in a less medicalized setting. Implementation studies in Europe are also assessing this in their countries.

The National Health Service (NHS) in the UK is a very specific health environment where people are entitled to treatment and care which is free at the point of delivery. Unlike other medical specialties where primary care physicians are responsible for prescribing treatment for chronic conditions, PWH are managed and receive their HIV treatment in HIV and sexual health clinics. For the circa 105K people with HIV in the UK, outcomes are excellent. More than 95% of those on treatment have undetectable viral loads. However, around 8100 people in the UK are not able to take oral ART successfully. US guidelines have specified that LA CAB+ RPV is particularly important for those who experience pill fatigue, stigma and have fears of inadvertent disclosure. This is highly relevant to the ethnically diverse population of people in the UK living with HIV, many of whom come from marginalized and minoritized communities in which stigma is rife and in whom the treatment outcomes are the poorest. Women, racially minoritized people and older people are chronically under-represented in HIV clinical trials which is why we have set recruitment caps to ensure we recruit 50% women, 50% ethnically diverse people and 30% over 50 years of age. This is to ensure that we go beyond lip-service and hold ourselves to account in designing our trials with peer researcher involvement from the outset and committing to include a more representative study population. We will achieve this by engaging actively with community organisations to ensure awareness of this implementation trials.

The study will be conducted at six large clinic sites both in London and outside of London. In this pragmatic real-world trial, each site will identify the most workable option to deliver of CAB+RPV LA according to SmPC license in the community setting within their region or borough.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Documented HIV-1 infection
  • Virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml) on a stable antiretroviral regimen
  • Able and willing to complete informed consent prior to inclusion
  • No hepatitis B
  • In accordance with EU license and NICE guidance

Exclusion criteria

  • Based on contraindication for CAB LA, RPV LA, in accordance with EU license and NICE guidance
  • Prior virologic failure on substances of NNRTI or INI class
  • Resistance mutations to any substance of the NNRTI or INI class
  • Prior exposure to CAB + RPV LA

Treatment and study plan

The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

Other

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (FIM and AIM) are used to evaluate the feasibilit and acceptability of our implementation strategies. The FIM and AIM is a validated implementation outcome measure where higher scores indicate greater feasibility and acceptability

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (a validated method)

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate feasibility of CAB and RPV LA administration at clinics in England and community based settings by patients

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of care provider and nurse participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the FIM and via qualitative interviews

    Time frame: At Day 0, 4 Months and 12 Months

    To evaluate feasibility of CAB and RPV LA administration at 6 English clinics and decentralised community settings by healthcare professionals (HCPs)

  2. Proportion of care provider and nurse participants that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (a validated method)

    Time frame: At Day 0, 4 Months and 12 Months

    To evaluate acceptability of CAB and RPV LA by participants and clinic staff

  3. Proportion of community site representatives that agree or completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) score of on the FIM and AIM with in-depth qualitative interviews with community site representative

    Time frame: At 8 months and 12 months

    To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of CAB and RPV LA by community site representatives

  4. Proportion of injections occurring within target window from target date (± 7 days of target date)

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe adherence to dosing window by clinicians

  5. Proportion of injections occurring after target window with/without use of oral ART

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe adherence to dosing window by clinicians

  6. Incidence and extent of oral bridging use

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe adherence to dosing window by clinicians

  7. Qualitative interviews with nurses to ascertain the utility of the Blueprints by Community Nurse or Clinic Nurse

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate the utility of the Blueprints by Community Nurse or Clinic Nurse

  8. Questionnaire checklist of Blueprint activities documentation to ascertain adaptations to Blueprints

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate the fidelity to Blueprint by Community Nurse or Clinic Nurse

  9. Qualitative interviews to ascertain the utility of Facilitation Calls to improve implementation from the HIV clinic staff, Community Nurses, Clinic Nurses

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate the utility of Facilitation Calls to improve implementation from the HIV clinic staff, Community Nurses, Clinic Nurses

  10. HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQs-12) (a validated questionnaire) to assess and ascertain the change in treatment satisfaction score over time and by setting

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe the change in treatment satisfaction score over time and by setting

  11. Validated questionnaires to describe tolerability and acceptance of injections

    Time frame: 12 Months

    To describe tolerability and acceptance of injections

  12. Validated questionnaires and qualitative interviews to ascertain participants' overall treatment experience preference and medical need for long-acting therapy

    Time frame: 12 Months

    To describe participants' overall treatment experience preference and medical need for long-acting therapy

  13. Qualitative interviews to ascertain patient preference for setting they receive injections and the reasons for their choice

    Time frame: 12 Months

    To describe patient preference for setting they receive injections and the reasons for their choice

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of CAB and RPV LA related ADRs (adverse drug reactions) and all SAEs

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe safety of CAB and RPV LA

  2. Proportion of participants who do not progress to injections/discontinuation during oral lead in

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe safety of CAB and RPV LA

  3. Proportion of participants who discontinue CAB and RPV LA, for all cause, virological reasons or tolerability

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe safety of CAB and RPV LA

  4. Proportion of participants who are virologically suppressed (plasma HIV-1 RNA VL<50 c/mL) at month 4 and 12 (with +/- 6-week window)

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe effectiveness of CAB and RPV LA

  5. Proportion participants with VL ≥ 50 c/mL at M4 and M12 (with a +/- 6-week window

    Time frame: 12 months

    To describe effectiveness of CAB and RPV LA

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Queen Mary University of London

Other

Collaborators

  • Barts & The London NHS Trust
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Registry information

Official study title

Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals - the ILANA Study

Acronym: ILANA

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Mar 24, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.