UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, 3508 GA, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT00293618
This study evaluates whether the implementation of a prediction rule for postoperative nausea and vomiting changes physician behaviour, improves patient outcome and improves cost-effectiveness of treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Utrecht, 3508 GA, Netherlands
Background and objectives. So-called prediction rules (risk scores) have become increasingly popular in all medical disciplines. This will only rise with the introduction of electronic patient records as these will enhance their use. However, effects of implementation of such rules in daily care has hardly been studied. Also not in anesthesiology. We developed and validated an accurate rule to preoperatively predict the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in surgical inpatients. PONV causes extreme patient discomfort and occurs in even 30%-50% of all surgical inpatients. As routine administration of PONV prophylaxis is not cost-effective, a risk-tailored approach using an accurate prediction rule is widely advocated. Before large-scale implementation, we aim to study whether such implementation indeed changes physician behavior and improves patient outcome. Given the increase interest in prediction rules, another aim is to study general causes of successful/poor implementation of prediction rules in health care. Design. Cluster, randomized study in which 60 anesthesiologists and senior residents of the UMC Utrecht will be randomized to either the intervention or usual care group.
Study population. Adult,elective,non-ambulatory,surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia of UMC Utrecht.
Intervention. Implementation of risk-tailored PONV strategy (use of the PONV prediction rule with suggested anti-emetic strategies per risk group) in current care.
Outcomes. Primary:incidence of PONV in first 24 hours. Secondary:change in anesthesiologists' behavior in terms of administered anti-emetic management, cost-effectiveness of intervention, attitudes of physicians towards prediction rules in general.
Sample size. 11,000
Economic evaluation. Estimation of incremental costs per prevented PONV case.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Automatic calculation and presentation of a patient's individual predicted PONV risk by the anesthesia information management system during the entire procedure
Specific information is provided to the intervention group: about PONV, about the prediction model. While the Usual Care group only receives information about the study purposes
Feedback about the physician's personal performance on prevention of PONV
Time frame: within 24 hours after surgery
Time frame: Perioperative
Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery
Time frame: At the start and end of the study
UMC Utrecht
Other
IMplementation of a Prediction Rule in Anesthesia Practice to Improve Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05676294
Nausea, Pathologic Processes
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07068230
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06211088
Nausea, Pathologic Processes
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05134363
Head and Neck Surgeries, Nausea
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details