No intervention
OtherNo intervention included
NCT Number: NCT05420207
The long-term goal of this project is to better understand factors at the patient and physician level that can be addressed to impact uptake of long-acting, implantable PrEP (LA-PrEP) products in the future and identify the training needs of physicians. This project specifically focuses on men who have sex with men (MSM) seen in primary care settings in Texas. The main objective of this project is to examine perspectives of MSM and physicians in Texas regarding LA-PrEP, including attitudes and barriers to use and implementation by interviewing patients and physicians from the same clinical practices.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Male
Observational
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
The long-term goal of this project is to better understand factors at the patient and physician level that can be addressed to impact uptake of long-acting, implantable PrEP (LA-PrEP) products and identify the training needs of physicians. This project is based on the hypothesis that specific barriers to uptake of LA-PrEP may exist that must be addressed to support widespread implementation in primary care settings in the future. Primary care settings are the ideal setting for new PrEP medications that employ innovative strategies for use, including implantable formulations, particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM). Primary care settings have demonstrated acceptability for other implantable medications, and similar strategies may be helpful for uptake of PrEP. However, new training and strategies will be needed for physicians to use this type of product with their patients should it become available. At this time, little is known about physician willingness to do the procedures required to insert the implant and what training will be needed. In particular, it is important to assess what training may be needed to effectively engage in health conversations with MSM patients. Thus, the main objective of this project is as follows: To examine perspectives of MSM (n=50) and physicians (n=20) in Texas regarding LA-PrEP, including attitudes and barriers to use and implementation by interviewing patients and physicians from the same clinical practices.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No intervention included
Time frame: Baseline
Patient readiness to use Long-Acting, implantable Pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) is assessed via interview asking men who have sex with men (MSM) patients to respond to the following question: There may be opportunities in the future to have access to products that prevent HIV that are long-acting (LA) and are implanted under the skin. What are your thoughts on using this type of product if it becomes available for use? This is a qualitative measure and will report the summary of responses.
Time frame: Baseline
Patient readiness to use LA-PrEP is measured by a 10-item investigator developed questionnaire where participants will be asked to rate the importance of 10 items regarding their readiness to use implantable long-acting PrEP on a scale of 1-10. Each item will be rated on a scale of 1-10. The mean for each item will be reported. Higher score is higher readiness.
Time frame: Baseline
Facilitators to LA-PrEP uptake and adherence is assessed by asking questions to MSM patients via an interview which will include 3 questions on the following:
This is a qualitative measure and will report the summary of responses.
Time frame: Baseline
PrEP Stigma in both cohorts (MSM patients and MSM physicians) is measured by the PrEP stigma and positive attitude scale. The PrEP stigma scale is assessed by 7 questions in both cohorts (MSM patients and physicians). Possible scores range from 1-5 where higher score indicates higher levels of stigma. Scores will be calculated by using the mean score of all items for the factor.
Time frame: Baseline
Positive Attitudes towards PrEP in both cohorts (MSM patients and MSM physicians) is measured by the PrEP stigma and positive attitude scale. The Positive Attitudes towards PrEP scale is assessed by 3 questions in both cohorts (MSM patients and physicians). Possible scores range from 1-5 where higher scores indicate more positive attitudes. Scores will be calculated by using the mean score of all items for the factor.
Time frame: Baseline
Physician comfort with PrEP Clinical Activities is measured by an adapted scale (Petroll and colleagues) that includes rating their comfort level regarding 11 clinical activities using a scale of 1-5 where 1 is "completely uncomfortable" and 5 is "completely comfortable." We will sum the total score.
Time frame: Baseline
Facilitators to LA-PrEP uptake and adherence is assessed by asking questions to physicians via an interview which will include 2 questions on the following:
This is a qualitative measure and will report the summary of responses.
Time frame: Baseline
Physician Training Needs are assessed via physician interview that will include 2 questions asking the type of training required to prepare physicians -
This is a qualitative measure and will report the summary of responses.
Time frame: Baseline
Physician Training Needs rating is measured by an investigator developed scale of 1-10 where participants will be asked to rate how helpful would it be to include 10 specific types of content in a training on long acting implantable PrEP. The mean rating for each item will be reported. Possible scores range from 1-10 where higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived helpfulness.
Elizabeth Arnold
Other
Implantable Long-Acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention With MSM: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Physician Perspectives
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07133555
HIV Counseling and Testing, HIV Prevention
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05087680
HIV Prevention
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07074899
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Lima, Lima Province, Peru
View Trial DetailsNCT04899024
Behavior, HIV Prevention
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details