University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06586723
Social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) problems occur frequently among elementary school students, dramatically impede student outcomes, and have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence based practices exist to address student SEB needs, prevent problems, and ensure academic success. However, the implementation of these programs in schools is frequently incomplete, uneven, and occurs with insufficient fidelity to ensure positive effects for students due to significant implementation barriers across multiple levels. The purpose of this Impact Trial is to test the effectiveness of the Helping Educational Leaders Mobilize Evidence (HELM) implementation strategy in school-wide implementation of a Tier 1 evidence-based practice (EBP) - Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is an evidence-based, multi-tiered, problem-solving, and team-based framework designed to build a continuum of supports to promote all students' social emotional behavioral health.
Helping Educational Leaders Mobilize Evidence (HELM) is an implementation strategy for promoting building-level implementation leadership, implementation climate, and high-fidelity delivery of evidence-based practices
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
The Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) is a 45-item tool used to provide a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of the extent to which school personnel are applying the core features of PBIS. The TFI is a group-assessment completed by a schoolwide system planning team with external facilitation with strong internal consistency. The scoring criteria for each individual item ranges from 0-3 (0=Not Implemented, 1=Partially Implemented, 3=Fully Implemented); higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
The SILS has 24 items loading onto 8 subscales: Proactive, Knowledgeable, Supportive, Perseverant, Communication, Vision, Available, and Distributed Leadership. The scoring criteria for each individual item ranges from 0-4; higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
The SICS includes 21 items loading onto 7 subscales: Focus on EBP, Educational Support for EBP, Recognition for EBP, Rewards for EBP, Use of Data to Support EBP, Existing Supports for EBP, and EBP Integration. The scoring criteria for each individual item ranges from 0-4; higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
This survey asks educators how much time they spent on study-related procedures each week. Inputs will include time, supplies, travel, overhead, and costs associated with HELM training/coaching meetings, including pre-work, scheduling, and attending meetings; as well as costs associated with PBIS training and delivery.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
The DBR will be used in which teachers observe and rate their classroom's overall academic engagement (i.e., actively or passively participating in the classroom activity, 0-100%), disruptive behavior (i.e., interrupting activities, 0-100%), and prosocial behavior (i.e., following directions, 0-100%; Chafouleas et al., 2012).
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
Standardized academic test scores will be derived from administrative records.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
Number of office discipline referrals, suspensions, and expulsions will be derived from administrative records.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
Student attendance rates will be derived from administrative records.
Time frame: Baseline, 9 months, 12 months
As a manipulation check to document HELM intervention delivery, we will assess HELM fidelity using the HELM fidelity checklist (based on observations of recorded HELM trainings). HELM coaches will complete a standardized measure of dates specific steps were completed. Schools that achieve 80% or higher of the maximum possible score on all HELM fidelity criteria will be considered having received a full dose of HELM training and coaching.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Washington
Other
Acronym: HELM 2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03641092
Behavior, Child Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06341179
Behavior, Body Weight
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06471816
Behavior, Child Behavior
Bergen, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT06140017
Behavior, Child Behavior
Kisumu, Kenya
View Trial Details