"Annunziata" Hospital
Cosenza, 87100, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07009951
Pain during pacemaker or defibrillator implantation can increase patient discomfort, anxiety, and the need for deeper sedation. Using virtual reality (VR) as a non-pharmacological distraction tool may help reduce perceived pain, stabilize vital signs, and improve the overall patient experience. This prospective, single-center study evaluates whether adding VR to standard sedation lowers pain levels compared to sedation alone. Patients undergoing device implantation will be randomized to either group, with pain and vital signs monitored throughout the procedure. The study also explores patient satisfaction, adverse effects, and the potential of VR to support same-day discharge after minimally invasive procedures.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Cosenza, 87100, Italy
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
VR headset provides an immersive environment, such as natural landscapes accompanied by relaxing music. The use of VR will begin at least five minutes before the start of the procedure to allow the patient to acclimate. The headset will remain in use throughout the entire procedure, unless complications arise (e.g., nausea or significant discomfort).
Time frame: during electrophysiology procedures
To evaluate the difference in pain perception between a group using virtual reality (VR) and a control group subjected only to standard sedation, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a self-reported scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate greater pain and discomfort. The NRS will be recorded at the end of the procedure, referring to the pain experienced during the entire electrophysiology procedure.
Time frame: during electrophysiology procedures
To compare the change in systolic blood pressure (mmHg) during the procedure between the virtual reality (VR) group and the control group receiving standard sedation. Measurements will be taken at baseline, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. The difference between groups will be assessed at each time point.
Time frame: during electrophysiology procedures
To compare the change in heart rate (beats per minute) during the procedure between the virtual reality (VR) group and the control group receiving standard sedation. Measurements will be taken at baseline, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. The difference between groups will be assessed at each time point.
Time frame: during electrophysiology procedures
To compare the change in respiratory rate (breaths per minute) during the procedure between the virtual reality (VR) group and the control group receiving standard sedation. Measurements will be taken at baseline, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. The difference between groups will be assessed at each time point.
Time frame: during electrophysiology procedures
To compare the change in oxygen saturation (SpO₂, %) during the procedure between the virtual reality (VR) group and the control group receiving standard sedation. Measurements will be taken at baseline, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and at the end of the procedure. The difference between groups will be assessed at each time point.
Time frame: during electrophysiology procedures
To evaluate patient satisfaction with the overall experience of the procedure. Satisfaction will be assessed using a structured questionnaire at the end of the procedure. Results will be expressed as a percentage score from 0% to 100%, where higher percentages indicate greater satisfaction. The satisfaction level will be categorized as follows:
0-20%: Very unsatisfied 21-40%: Unsatisfied 41-60%: Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied 61-79%: Satisfied 80-100%: Very satisfied
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 7 days
To evaluate whether the use of virtual reality (VR) during electrophysiology procedures can contribute to a reduction in hospital stay, potentially allowing early discharge in some cases. The outcome will be measured as the mean number of days of hospital stay, and the difference between the VR group and the control group will be assessed.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Calabria
Other
Acute Clinical Outcomes Following the Implementation of Virtual Reality (VR) in the Electrophysiology Laboratory
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03695887
Acute Pain, Burns
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06411054
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06539741
Acute Pain, Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07553000
Acute Pain, Arm Injuries
Malmö, Sweden
View Trial Details