Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS
Milan, MI, 20138, Italy
NCT Number: NCT03976921
CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTP) represents one of the newly developed CT-based techniques but its cost-effectiveness in the clinical pathway is undefined. The aim of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of combined evaluation of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion in intermediate to high-risk patients for suspected CAD or with known disease in terms of clinical decision-making, resource utilization and outcomes in a broad variety of geographic areas and patient subgroups.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Milan, MI, 20138, Italy
The use of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is usually suggested in low to intermediate risk for its diagnostic and prognostic role to rule out CAD with low radiation exposure. In the setting of intermediate to high risk patients, the addition of functional information is prognostically useful and, in patients with previous history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), functional strategy has been shown to be more cost-effective as compared to anatomical assessment CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTP) represents one of the newly developed CT-based techniques, combining both anatomical and functional evaluation of CAD in a single imaging modality. More recently, stress CTP was shown to provide additional diagnostic value as compared to CCTA alone in intermediate to high risk patients. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the usefulness and impact of combined evaluation of coronary artery anatomy and myocardial perfusion with CCTA+CTP in intermediate to high risk patients for suspected CAD or with known disease in terms of clinical decision-making, resource utilization, and outcomes in a broad variety of geographic areas and patient subgroups.
CTP-PRO study is a cooperative, international, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a CCTA+CTP strategy versus usual care in intermediate to high risk patients with suspected or known CAD who undergo clinically indicated diagnostic evaluation.
Patients will be screened for study eligibility. Patients meeting all selection criteria will be asked to sign an informed consent document prior to undergoing any study-specific evaluation; then a structured interview will be performed and a clinical history obtained, assessing the presence of common cardiac risk factors, drug therapy (focus on statin, aspirin and/or antiplatelet agent use) and symptoms (typical or atypical angina, to estimate the pre-test likelihood of CAD).
Upon completion of the screening procedure and enrollment, the patients will be randomized 1:1 to the CT-based strategy (Group A) or usual care (Group B). Patient follow-up will be performed at 1 year (± 1 month) and 2 years (± 1 month) by trained interviewers who check medical records or by phone interview collecting the following information: downstream testing; overall radiation exposure; outcomes; cost-effectiveness estimation.
The primary endpoint of the study is the reclassification rate of CCTA in group B due to the addition of CTP. The secondary endpoint will be the comparison between group A and group B in terms of non-invasive and invasive downstream testing, prevalence of obstructive CAD at ICA, revascularization, cumulative ED and overall cost during the follow-up at 1- and 2-years. The tertiary endpoint will be the comparison between each group in terms of MACE and cost-effectiveness at 1- and 2-years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
When judged indicated, functional assessment with stress CTP perfusion will be performed on top of CCTA.
(a) functional non-invasive tests (stress ECG, or imaging-based tests such as Stress Echo, Stress CMR, SPECT or PET) as a gatekeeper for ICA; (b) direct referral to ICA.
Time frame: 30 days.
For each enrolled patient in whom both CCTA and stress CTP will be performed, the endpoint review committee will use data from coronary CTA and CTP, along with the clinical data to determine the management plan using the following criteria: (a) optimal medical therapy, (b) more non-invasive information required, (c) invasive evaluation required, (d) revascularization treatment (PCI or CABG or hybrid treatment).
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B in terms of number of non-invasive downstream testing (Exercise EKG, Stress-Echo, SPECT, Stress CMR, PET) or invasive testing (invasive coronary angiography) performed after the randomization.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B in terms of number of downstream invasive testing (invasive coronary angiography) performed after the randomization.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B in terms of number of patients with obstructive CAD at ICA.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B in terms of number of patients treated with revascularization (PCI or CABG or hybrid treatment).
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B in terms of cumulative Effective Dose (ED), measured in mSv, due to non-invasive or invasive testing performed after randomization.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B in terms of overall costs of downstream diagnostic tests (sum of costs of all diagnostic tests performed after randomization), expressed in Dollars, according to local reimbursement.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B group in terms of number of patients that needed hospitalization for cardiac reason.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B group in terms of number of patients that needed hospitalization for unstable angina (defined according to 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2016:37,267-315).
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B group in terms of number of patients that experienced non-fatal myocardial infarction (defined according to Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction, 2018. Eur Heart J 2019:40,237-269).
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Comparison between group A and group B group in terms of number of patients that experienced death because of immediate cardiac cause (e.g., MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia) or vascular cause (e.g., cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause). Unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause will be classified as cardiovascular death.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
MACE will be defined as a combined endpoint of unstable angina, nonfatal MI, and cardiac death.
Time frame: 1- and 2-years.
Cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated according to the following equation: (Index test cost + downstream diagnostic tests cost) / projected remaining life expectancy.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Other
Impact of Stress Cardiac Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion on Downstream Resources and PROgnosis in Patients With Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease: a Multicenter International Study
Acronym: CTP-PRO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05540223
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Neuss, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05846893
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT04390672
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Galway, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT07432620
Angina Pectoris, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details