NCT Number: NCT03499535
Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers). Participants in both studies were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants viewed radon messages that varied in the information they communicated about smoking's effect on lung cancer. In Study 1, smoking information was included or excluded from messages assembled from existing radon pamphlets. In Study 2, versions of a new radon message either excluded smoking information, described smoking as a major cause of lung cancer, or also described smoking's synergistic effect with radon on lung cancer risk. After viewing a radon health message, participants completed a variety of measures. Primary measures assessed respondents' anticipated sense of concern and related reactions if they learned that they/their home had been exposed to elevated levels of radon. Other key measures included questions about participants' interest and intention to test their home for radon.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure and smoking. No information describing the synergistic effects of smoking and radon exposure on lung cancer risk are included.
Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.
Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 1 minute)
Composite formed from 4 conditional questions assessing concern, perceived impact on risk and comparative risk, and threat--if exposed to radon
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Composite formed from 2 questions assessing importance and intention to test home for radon
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)
Single question assessing worry elicited by the health communication material
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Three items assessing perceived likelihood of developing lung cancer
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Participants given option to leave email address in case they won one of the 20 radon kits being raffled (Study 2).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Participants given option to be presented with more information at the end of the session about testing for radon (Study 2).
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)
Rated how concerned they would be about loved ones if they learned their home had high radon (Study 2)
Paul Windschitl
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07711691
Behavior, Cigarette Smoking
Anaheim, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04577599
Behavior, Lung Cancer
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05512377
Biliary Tract Cancer, Biliary Tract Diseases
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07682220
Behavior, Digestive System Diseases
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
View Trial Details