Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05646316

Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer

This phase III trial compares the effect of sentinel lymph node mapping to standard lymph node dissection in reducing the risk of swelling in the legs (lymphedema) in patients undergoing a hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer. Standard lymph node dissection removes lymph nodes around the uterus during a hysterectomy to look for spread of cancer from the uterus to nearby lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node mapping uses a special dye and camera to look for cancer that may have spread to nearby lymph nodes. Comparing the results of the procedures may help doctors predict the risk of long-term swelling in the legs.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

George Washington University Medical Center, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the rates of lower extremity limb dysfunction (defined as a >= 4-point increase in Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire [GCLQ] symptom score from baseline) in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy:

Ia. Sentinel lymph node mapping and excision followed by side-specific lymphadenectomy on sides without a sentinel lymph node (SLN) identified according to a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines approved algorithm (Arm 1); Ib. Sentinel lymph node mapping and excision according to an NCCN Guidelines approved algorithm followed by bilateral pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Arm 2).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare changes in lower extremity limb circumference in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy.

II. To validate the test characteristics of a SLN mapping algorithm including SLN detection rates, rate of perioperative complications, rate of identifying lymphatic metastases, and detection of micrometastases using pathologic ultra-staging.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare adjuvant therapy decisions in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy.

II. To explore the impact of patient characteristics (age, body mass index [BMI], race), extent of lymph node dissection, and adjuvant therapy decisions (radiation, chemotherapy) on the development of lower extremity limb dysfunction - as well as their interaction with lymph node assessment strategies.

III. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SLN mapping with or without completion of lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

SAFETY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare progression free and overall survival in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM 1: Patients receive ICG dye via injection and undergo sentinel lymph node mapping and excision during standard minimally invasive hysterectomy. Lymph nodes around the uterus may be removed if the mapping and excision cannot be completed. Successful mapping requires no additional removal of lymph nodes.

ARM 2: Patients receive ICG dye via injection and undergo sentinel lymph node mapping and excision during standard minimally invasive hysterectomy. Additional lymph nodes around the uterus are removed per standard of care.

Patients in both arms also undergo imaging as clinically indicated and optional blood sample collection throughout the study.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed every 3 months for one year and at 18 and 24 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically proven diagnosis of endometrial cancer based on endometrial sampling with a plan to undergo laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy and lymphatic assessment as part of primary management. Biopsy must be performed within 90 days prior to registration
  • Clinical stage I endometrial cancer based on the following diagnostic workup:
  • History/physical examination within 30 days prior to registration is reassuring for the absence of metastatic disease
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0, 1 or 2
  • Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen are eligible for this trial
  • The patient or a legally authorized representative must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry and, for patients treated in the United States (U.S.), authorization permitting release of personal health information
  • Patients must speak English, Spanish, or Korean

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients whom the surgeon believes is not a candidate for pelvic lymphadenectomy due to medical comorbidities or other technical challenges (i.e. morbid obesity or prior surgery)
  • History of chemotherapy or immunotherapy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Progestin-containing therapies such as megestrol, medroxyprogesterone, or levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine device (IUD) are acceptable
  • History of radiation to the pelvis, groin or lower extremities, or surgery to the pelvic lymph nodes or inguinal lymph nodes
  • Patients who are going to undergo another elective surgery during the same operative event as their hysterectomy (i.e., sacrocolpopexy, cholecystectomy)
  • Patients with severe, active co-morbidity defined as follows:
  • History of patient or provider identified lower extremity lymphedema
  • History of patient or provider identified chronic lower extremity swelling
  • History of lower extremity or pelvic deep venous thromboembolism within 90 days of registration
  • History of lower extremity cellulitis within 90 days of registration

Treatment and study plan

Biospecimen Collection

Procedure

Undergo blood sample collection

Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection

Diagnostic Imaging Testing

Procedure

Undergo imaging

Other names: Diagnostic Imaging, Medical Imaging

Excisional Biopsy

Procedure

Undergo sentinel lymph node excision

Other names: Biopsy, Excisional, surgical biopsy

Indocyanine Green Solution

Drug

Given via injection

Other names: IC-GREEN, ICG Solution

Minimally Invasive Surgery

Procedure

Undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy

Other names: Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Surgery, Minimally Invasive

Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

Procedure

Undergo pelvic lymphadenectomy

Other names: Excision Pelvic Lymph Nodes, Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

sentinel lymph node mapping

Procedure

Undergo sentinel lymph node mapping

Other names: Sentinel Lymph Node Imaging

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of patient-reported lower extremity limb dysfunction

    Time frame: From 18 months post-hysterectomy after undergoing lymphatic assessment to 39 months

    The primary endpoint is the incidence of patient-reported lower extremity limb dysfunction at 18 months post-hysterectomy after undergoing lymphatic assessment according to a National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-based sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping algorithm with or without completion of lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint will be assessed using the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) questionnaire. Surveys will be performed at enrollment (pre-surgery) and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months post-surgery. Patient-reported lower extremity limb dysfunction will be defined as an increase in GCLQ symptom score of at least four (4) points from baseline at any time during the 18 months follow-up. The primary null hypothesis will be evaluated with an intent-to-treat chi-squared test, adjusted for stratification factors. Proportional hazards modeling will be used to generate a hazard ratio and 95% confidence limits of Arm 1 versus Arm 2.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of lymphedema by quantifiable lower extremity limb changes

    Time frame: From enrollment and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after surgery

    Patients will undergo circumferential lower extremity limb measures at three locations along each leg. Change will be estimated as measurement at baseline subtracted from measurement at follow-up. This will be assessed in both legs separately.

  2. Rate of successful bilateral SLN identification

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    Will be assessed in both, and only as the time of surgery.

  3. Rate of successful identification of lymph node metastasis

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    Will be assessed in both, and only as the time of surgery. The rate of lymph node metastasis identification during surgery will be compared between groups, with either t-tests or chi-squared tests where appropriate.

  4. Rate of perioperative complications

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    Will be assessed in both arms separately, and only as the time of surgery. The rate of perioperative complications during surgery will be compared between groups, with either t-tests or chi-squared tests where appropriate.

Other outcomes

  1. Adjuvant therapy decisions

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Adjuvant therapy decisions will be compared for patients according to study arm allocation after accounting for tumor characteristics, stage, and patient demographics to determine whether lymph node mapping strategies was associated with a difference in adjuvant therapy choice.

  2. Patient characteristic, extent of lymph node dissection, and adjuvant therapy decisions

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Patient characteristics (age, body mass index, race), extent of lymph node dissection, and adjuvant therapy decisions (radiation, chemotherapy), will be collected to determine their impact as a covariate on the development of the primary endpoint (lower extremity limb dysfunction). Models adjusting for potential confounders will be fitted and analyzed.

  3. Progression free survival

    Time frame: The duration of time from study entry to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, or date of last contact if neither progression nor death has occurred, assessed at 2 years after enrollment

    This endpoint is not expected to be sufficiently powered for a definitive comparison and will therefore be treated as supportive evidence.

  4. Overall survival

    Time frame: Duration of time from study entry to time of death or the date of last contact, assessed at 2 years after enrollment

    This endpoint is not expected to be sufficiently powered for a definitive comparison and will therefore be treated as supportive evidence.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NRG Oncology

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Trial Of The Impact Of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping On Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction In Endometrial Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 12, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.