Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT05646316
This phase III trial compares the effect of sentinel lymph node mapping to standard lymph node dissection in reducing the risk of swelling in the legs (lymphedema) in patients undergoing a hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer. Standard lymph node dissection removes lymph nodes around the uterus during a hysterectomy to look for spread of cancer from the uterus to nearby lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node mapping uses a special dye and camera to look for cancer that may have spread to nearby lymph nodes. Comparing the results of the procedures may help doctors predict the risk of long-term swelling in the legs.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
George Washington University Medical Center, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the rates of lower extremity limb dysfunction (defined as a >= 4-point increase in Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire [GCLQ] symptom score from baseline) in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy:
Ia. Sentinel lymph node mapping and excision followed by side-specific lymphadenectomy on sides without a sentinel lymph node (SLN) identified according to a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines approved algorithm (Arm 1); Ib. Sentinel lymph node mapping and excision according to an NCCN Guidelines approved algorithm followed by bilateral pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Arm 2).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare changes in lower extremity limb circumference in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy.
II. To validate the test characteristics of a SLN mapping algorithm including SLN detection rates, rate of perioperative complications, rate of identifying lymphatic metastases, and detection of micrometastases using pathologic ultra-staging.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare adjuvant therapy decisions in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy.
II. To explore the impact of patient characteristics (age, body mass index [BMI], race), extent of lymph node dissection, and adjuvant therapy decisions (radiation, chemotherapy) on the development of lower extremity limb dysfunction - as well as their interaction with lymph node assessment strategies.
III. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SLN mapping with or without completion of lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
SAFETY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare progression free and overall survival in patients with apparent uterine confined endometrial cancer randomized to one of two lymphatic assessment strategies at time of hysterectomy.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients receive ICG dye via injection and undergo sentinel lymph node mapping and excision during standard minimally invasive hysterectomy. Lymph nodes around the uterus may be removed if the mapping and excision cannot be completed. Successful mapping requires no additional removal of lymph nodes.
ARM 2: Patients receive ICG dye via injection and undergo sentinel lymph node mapping and excision during standard minimally invasive hysterectomy. Additional lymph nodes around the uterus are removed per standard of care.
Patients in both arms also undergo imaging as clinically indicated and optional blood sample collection throughout the study.
After completion of study intervention, patients are followed every 3 months for one year and at 18 and 24 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo imaging
Other names: Diagnostic Imaging, Medical Imaging
Undergo sentinel lymph node excision
Other names: Biopsy, Excisional, surgical biopsy
Given via injection
Other names: IC-GREEN, ICG Solution
Undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy
Other names: Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Surgery, Minimally Invasive
Undergo pelvic lymphadenectomy
Other names: Excision Pelvic Lymph Nodes, Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
Ancillary studies
Undergo sentinel lymph node mapping
Other names: Sentinel Lymph Node Imaging
Time frame: From 18 months post-hysterectomy after undergoing lymphatic assessment to 39 months
The primary endpoint is the incidence of patient-reported lower extremity limb dysfunction at 18 months post-hysterectomy after undergoing lymphatic assessment according to a National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-based sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping algorithm with or without completion of lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint will be assessed using the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) questionnaire. Surveys will be performed at enrollment (pre-surgery) and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months post-surgery. Patient-reported lower extremity limb dysfunction will be defined as an increase in GCLQ symptom score of at least four (4) points from baseline at any time during the 18 months follow-up. The primary null hypothesis will be evaluated with an intent-to-treat chi-squared test, adjusted for stratification factors. Proportional hazards modeling will be used to generate a hazard ratio and 95% confidence limits of Arm 1 versus Arm 2.
Time frame: From enrollment and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after surgery
Patients will undergo circumferential lower extremity limb measures at three locations along each leg. Change will be estimated as measurement at baseline subtracted from measurement at follow-up. This will be assessed in both legs separately.
Time frame: At time of surgery
Will be assessed in both, and only as the time of surgery.
Time frame: At time of surgery
Will be assessed in both, and only as the time of surgery. The rate of lymph node metastasis identification during surgery will be compared between groups, with either t-tests or chi-squared tests where appropriate.
Time frame: At time of surgery
Will be assessed in both arms separately, and only as the time of surgery. The rate of perioperative complications during surgery will be compared between groups, with either t-tests or chi-squared tests where appropriate.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Adjuvant therapy decisions will be compared for patients according to study arm allocation after accounting for tumor characteristics, stage, and patient demographics to determine whether lymph node mapping strategies was associated with a difference in adjuvant therapy choice.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Patient characteristics (age, body mass index, race), extent of lymph node dissection, and adjuvant therapy decisions (radiation, chemotherapy), will be collected to determine their impact as a covariate on the development of the primary endpoint (lower extremity limb dysfunction). Models adjusting for potential confounders will be fitted and analyzed.
Time frame: The duration of time from study entry to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, or date of last contact if neither progression nor death has occurred, assessed at 2 years after enrollment
This endpoint is not expected to be sufficiently powered for a definitive comparison and will therefore be treated as supportive evidence.
Time frame: Duration of time from study entry to time of death or the date of last contact, assessed at 2 years after enrollment
This endpoint is not expected to be sufficiently powered for a definitive comparison and will therefore be treated as supportive evidence.
NRG Oncology
Other
A Phase III Trial Of The Impact Of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping On Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction In Endometrial Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07723235
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04214067
Carcinosarcoma, Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05269381
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06638931
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
View Trial Details