Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong
NCT Number: NCT06478953
The goal of this intervention trial is to determine the feasibility, safety, and potential impact of rapid respiratory pathogen detection by FA Pneumonia Panel on antibiotic therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia.
Participants will randomized to either have an urgent BioFire FA Pneumonia Panel assay performed or recieve standard of care to guide antimicrobial therapy and treatment of pneumonia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Hong Kong
Pneumonia is the most common cause of sepsis requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Molecular pathogen detection techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may help optimize antimicrobial therapy. Its utility for diagnosing respiratory viral infections such as influenza is well established, and was an essential diagnostic tool during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, its use remains limited for bacterial pathogens. The rationale to use PCR based bacterial detection to facilitate antibiotic stewardship is threefold. First, it may shorten the time to pathogen detection. Second, it has improved sensitivity over conventional culture techniques, particularly for pathogens that are difficult to culture. Third, it can detect resistant genes to inform antimicrobial sensitivity. Taken together, utilization of bacterial PCR may shorten time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy and minimize injudicious use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials in patients who do not have infection from MDRO.
The BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (FA Pneumonia Panel) is a PCR based in vitro assay which rapidly identifies 8 viral and 18 bacterial common pathogens in tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples. Clinical studies showed that FA Pneumonia Panel on BAL specimens have sensitivity of 75 to 100% and specificity of >91% for the pathogens tested. Retrospective analysis suggests utilizing FA Pneumonia Panel may facilitate discontinuation or de-escalation of antimicrobials in 48% of patients with an average reduction of 6 antibiotic days. However, currently there are no randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of FA Pneumonia Panel on improving antimicrobial stewardship.
Addition of FA Pneumonia Panel to standard care should shorten time to pathogen and resistance detection, enhance sensitivity over conventional microbiological cultures and shorten time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy by reducing over-narrow and over-broad coverage. Robust clinical trials are now needed to test these hypotheses. We propose to conduct a pilot, randomized, controlled open-label trial designed to determine the feasibility, safety, and potential impact of rapid respiratory pathogen detection by FA Pneumonia Panel on antibiotic therapy in 40 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia.
The goal is to determine the feasibility, safety, and potential impact of rapid respiratory pathogen detection by BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel on antimicrobial therapy in 40 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A single BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel assay will be performed on a respiratory clinical specimen.
Time frame: 7 days
Defined as the time interval (hours) from time of randomization to earliest time that appropriate antimicrobial therapy is achieved as determined by the antimicrobial stewardship review panel.
Time frame: 48 hours
Defined as the proportion of patients with appropriate antimicrobial therapy at 48 hours after randomization as determined by the antimicrobial stewardship review panel
Time frame: 7 days
Defined as the time interval (hours) between culture or FA Pneumonia Panel sampling time to reporting time that confirmed the presence (with sensitivity pattern) or absence any causative pathogens from the tracheal aspirate or BAL sample taken after randomization.
Time frame: 28 days
Defined as the duration (hours) of antimicrobial therapy given after randomization until hospital discharge
Time frame: 48 hours
Defined as the proportion of patients who are prescribed carbapenem, tigecycline, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, linezolid, vancomycin, daptomycin, aztreonam or cefiderocol at 48 hours after randomization.
Time frame: 28 days
Defined as the number of days free from mechanical ventilation 28 days after randomization.
Time frame: 28 days
Defined as the number of days free from vasopressor therapy 28 days after randomization.
Time frame: 28 days
Defined as the duration (days) of ICU length of stay
Time frame: 28 days
Defined as the all-cause mortality rate on or before 28 days after randomization
Time frame: 7 days
Defined as the proportion of patients who required restart or escalation of antimicrobial therapy after discontinuation or de-escalation after ≥ 48 hours
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Other
Impact of Rapid Pathogen Detection in ICU Patients With Suspected Pneumonia on Antimicrobial Therapy: a Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Open-label Feasibility Trial (IRISPAT-1)
Acronym: IRISPAT-1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02387372
Critical Illness, Critically Ill
View Trial DetailsNCT00438269
Body Temperature Changes, Critical Illness
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07552779
COVID-19, COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04986254
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Brisbane, Australia
View Trial Details