Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01272999

Impact of Prevnar 13 on Ear Infections in Children

Prevnar (7 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [7vPnC]) has been shown to be effective against ear infections in children. Prevnar 13 is a new vaccine that is similar to Prevnar. It is expected that the effectiveness of Prevnar 13 against ear infections in children will be similar to that observed following Prevnar. Pfizer has committed to conduct a postmarketing study of the impact of Prevnar 13 in reducing ear infections among children.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

0 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Case eligibility should be based on microbiologic data and should be reviewed and documented by an appropriately qualified member of the investigator's study team before cases are included in the study database.
  • S pneumoniae identified from middle ear fluid or mastoiditis sample.
  • Specimen obtained from children aged up to 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

  • As this is an observational, laboratory based database study, there are no exclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

No intervention

Other

Non interventional

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype Isolates From Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Sample at Surveillance Year 1

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1

    The distribution of S pneumoniae serotypes isolated from MEF samples from children in the target population for vaccination over the surveillance year 1 were presented. The percentage of isolates of S pneumoniae serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (3, 7F, 19A, 19F) and not included in Prevnar 13 (6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38) along with total (both included and not included), clumps and missing or non-viable were computed along with exact 2-sided 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this outcome measure (OM).

  2. Percentage of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype Isolates From Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Sample at Surveillance Year 2

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 2

    The distribution of S pneumoniae serotypes isolated from MEF samples from children in the target population for vaccination over the surveillance year 2 were presented. The percentage of isolates of S pneumoniae serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (3, 7F, 19A, 19F) and not included in Prevnar 13 (6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38) along with total (both included and not included), clumps and missing or non-viable were computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  3. Percentage of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype Isolates From Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Sample at Surveillance Year 3

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 3

    The distribution of S pneumoniae serotypes isolated from MEF samples from children in the target population for vaccination over the surveillance year 3 were presented. The percentage of isolates of S pneumoniae serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (3, 7F, 19A, 19F) and not included in Prevnar 13 (6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38) along with total (both included and not included), clumps and missing or non-viable were computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  4. Percentage of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype Isolates From Mastoiditis Sample at Surveillance Year 1

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1

    The distribution of S pneumoniae serotypes isolated from mastoiditis samples from children in the target population for vaccination over the surveillance year 1 were presented. The percentage of isolates of S pneumoniae serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 7F, 14, 19A, 19F) and not included in Prevnar 13 (6C, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 21, 22F, 23A, 33F, 35B, 38) along with total (both included and not included in Prevnar 13 ), clumps and missing or non-viable were computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  5. Percentage of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype Isolates From Mastoiditis Sample at Surveillance Year 2

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 2

    The distribution of S pneumoniae serotypes isolated from mastoiditis samples from children in the target population for vaccination over the surveillance year 2 were presented. The percentage of isolates of S pneumoniae serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 7F, 14, 19A, 19F) and not included in Prevnar 13 (6C, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 21, 22F, 23A, 33F, 35B, 38) along with total (both included and not included in Prevnar 13 ), clumps and missing or non-viable were computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  6. Percentage of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype Isolates From Mastoiditis Sample at Surveillance Year 3

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 3

    The distribution of S pneumoniae serotypes isolated from mastoiditis samples from children in the target population for vaccination over the surveillance year 3 were presented. The percentage of isolates of S pneumoniae serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 7F, 14, 19A, 19F) and not included in Prevnar 13 (6C, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 21, 22F, 23A, 33F, 35B, 38) along with total (both included and not included in Prevnar 13 ), clumps and missing or non-viable were computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Amoxicillin: Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for amoxicillin from MEF samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19 A, 19 F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Cefotaxime: Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for cefotaxime from MEF samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19 A, 19 F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Ceftriaxone: Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for ceftriaxone from MEF samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19 A, 19 F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Clindamycin: Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for clindamycin from MEF samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19 A, 19 F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Erythromycin: Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for erythromycin from MEF samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19A, 19F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  6. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Penicillin: Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for penicillin from MEF samples were summarized by providing the range of MICs for penicillin tested and the percentage of the susceptibility interpretation was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate for each serotype, and for each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19 A, 19 F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95 % CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  7. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/S): Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for TMP/S from MEF samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 6C, 7C, 9N, 10, 11, 12, 12F, 13, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15F, 16, 17, 19A, 19F, 20, 21, 22F, 23A, 23B, 31, 33A, 33F, 34, 35B, 35F, 38, clumps and missing or non-viable, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. Missing or non-viable included isolates that were either not sent from an external laboratory, were non-viable or lost on culture prior to sending, or were non-viable on receipt in the central laboratory.'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  8. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Ceftriaxone: Mastoid Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for ceftriaxone from mastoid samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 19A, 19F, 21, 22F, 23A, 38, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. 'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  9. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Clindamycin: Mastoid Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for clindamycin from mastoid samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 19A, 19F, 21, 22F, 23A, 38, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. 'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  10. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Erythromycin: Mastoid Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for erythromycin from mastoid samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 19A, 19F, 21, 22F, 23A, 38, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. 'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  11. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Penicillin: Mastoid Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for penicillin from mastoid samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 19A, 19F, 21, 22F, 23A, 38, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. 'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  12. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates for Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/S): Mastoid Population

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of S pneumoniae isolates for TMP/S from mastoid samples was categorized as resistant, susceptible or intermediate based on MIC for each serotype at each year of the whole surveillance period. The percentage of S pneumoniae serotypes included 3, 12, 15A, 15B, 15F, 19A, 19F, 21, 22F, 23A, 38, which were to be computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of isolates. 'Number of isolates analyzed' signifies total number of isolates that were evaluable for this OM.

  13. Percentage of Participants With Primary Clinical Diagnosis of Otitis Media

    Time frame: Baseline Year 1, 2, 3; Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Percentage of participants with primary diagnosis of otitis media was computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of participants for each of the 3 surveillance year. Results for baseline period were analyzed for participants who received routinely recommended vaccination of 13vPnC. The cases of otitis media reported during the baseline period were captured by the Texas Children's Hospital, which was the only site that collected this information during the baseline period. Percentage of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with at least 1 MEF sample for the specified year by total number of participants with at least 1 MEF sample for the 3 year surveillance period.

  14. Percentage of Participants With Primary Clinical Diagnosis of Mastoiditis

    Time frame: Surveillance Year 1, 2, 3

    Percentage of participants with primary diagnosis of mastoiditis was computed along with exact 2-sided 95% CI based on the observed proportion of participants for each of the 3 surveillance year. Percentage of participants was calculated by dividing number of participants with at least 1 mastoid sample for the specified year by total number of participants with at least 1 mastoid sample for the 3 year surveillance period.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

POSTMARKETING OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF PREVNAR 13 (PNEUMOCOCCAL 13-VALENT CONJUGATE VACCINE) ON OTITIS MEDIA IN CHILDREN

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jan 10, 2011
Registry last updated
May 23, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.