Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05499611

Impact of Optical Genome Mapping in Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

A retrospective study using a new technology will be performed: the Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) samples stored at the CRB-Cancer of the Bordeaux University Hospital and annotated in the DATAML clinical database. The main objective is to estimate the proportion of AML patients for whom OGM detects at least one additional abnormality compared to conventional techniques. This study will constitute an important step in the validation of COA as a reference technique for cytogenetic analysis in AML, replacing the classical techniques, and could also constitute a first argument for redesigning the prognostic classification of AML.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

CHU de Bordeaux, service Hématologie Biologique

Bordeaux, France

About this study

In AML prognostic classifications, such as the ELN 2017 classification, which are used to guide treatment choices in the majority of protocols, rely heavily on genetic abnormalities. The Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) is a new technology that combines in one and the same technique the results of karyotype, FISH and SNP-Array, the latter being very little used in current practice in AML. OGM with greater sensitivity and a better resolution than the usual techniques should therefore allow us to identify more abnormalities than conventional cytogenetics; we would then like to determine whether these additional abnormalities have a prognostic impact, i.e., whether they lead to reclassification of patients initially classified as "favorable" or "intermediate" into the "unfavorable" prognostic category, with therapeutic consequences.

A retrospective study using the OGM is will be performed on samples stored at the CRB-Cancer of the Bordeaux University Hospital and annotated in the DATAML clinical database. In an original way, the focus will be on AML patients in whom 1 to 3 chromosomal abnormalities (non-recurrent WHO, not related to an unfavourable prognosis) have already been demonstrated by classical techniques, making the hypothesis that it is in this population that we would more easily have patients who could fall into the definition of the complex karyotype and thus into the unfavourable risk category.

OGM should therefore reveal a greater number of abnormalities which would allow a better definition of karyotypes with abnormalities, the number of complex and/or monosomal karyotypes and a better stratification of the prognosis of these patients with AML. This is an applied translational research study based on innovative technology that will define the place of OGM over current techniques used in the initial management of AML patients, and it may well become the new standard for cytogenetic analysis of AML in the coming years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years of age who have been treated with intensive chemotherapy
  • Diagnosis of AML (with a minimum follow-up of 24 months)
  • Presence of samples included in CRB-K in the AML collection
  • Cytogenetic data available: karyotype with 1-3 abnormalities present in one or more clones, excluding recurrent WHO abnormalities (t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16), t(9;11), t(v;11)(v;q23. 3), t(6;9), inv(3) or t(3;3) and t(9;22)) or assigned by itself to an unfavorable prognosis: -5 or del(5q); -7; -17/abn(17p).
  • Molecular data available for the following genes: ASXL1, CEBPA, FLT3-ITD, NPM1, RUNX1 and TP53 (the list of genes of interest may be adapted according to the upcoming ELN 2022 classification)

Exclusion criteria

  • Samples not included in the CRB-K (lack of consent, insufficient material...)
  • Karyotype with one of the following abnormalities: (t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16), t(9;11), t(v;11)(v;q23.3), t(6;9), inv(3) or t(3;3), and t(9;22)) or associated with an unfavorable prognosis on its own: -5 or del(5q); -7; -17/abn(17p)
  • Karyotype without clonal abnormality

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with more abnormalities detected by OGM than by conventional cytogenetics

    Time frame: At baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average number of additional abnormalities detected by OGM compared to conventional techniques

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Proportion of patients reclassified as complex and/or monosomal karyotype according to current ELN definitions

    Time frame: At baseline

  3. Proportion of patients for whom a change in therapeutic management could have been proposed

    Time frame: From baseline to Month 36

  4. Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival curves of patients reclassified to the unfavorable group to those of the intermediate and unfavorable groups in a historical cohort

    Time frame: From baseline to Month 36

  5. Interobserver reproducibility for interpretation of OGM results (Fleiss Kappa coefficient)

    Time frame: At baseline

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Contribution of Optical Genome Mapping to the Prognostic Classification of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of DNA Optical Mapping in the Management of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (COALA)

Acronym: COALA

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 12, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.