Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montréal
Montreal East, Quebec, H1T2M4, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03776838
The aim of the present study is to show that the use of the NOL device in addition to the Standard of Care (based on mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate values) to guide the administration of opioids compared to the Standard of Care reduces the total fentanyl consumption and the number of intraoperative administration of IV fentanyl during gynecological laparoscopic surgery and improves postoperative outcomes in PACU.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Montreal East, Quebec, H1T2M4, Canada
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the group who will be administered intraoperative fentanyl based on NOL + mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) + heart rate (HR) values (SoC+NOL group) versus on MABP and HR (SoC group) will need less intra and postoperative opioid and will report less postoperative pain which will be reflected by a reduced number of adverse effects associated with opioid and/or reduced postoperative pain scores at the PACU arrival resulting in a faster time of readiness to discharge.
Background: The NOL index, a nociception monitor using a multiparametric approach, has shown an excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting noxious stimuli under general anesthesia. This monitor is better than any other classically used clinical parameter in grading nociception under general anesthesia. More recently, a strong correlation between NOL index response to nociceptive stimulus and the level of opioid analgesia during surgery was reported. Studies are now conducted in our center (Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada) to show a better post-operative outcome when using intraoperative NOL monitoring to adapt nociception/anti-nociception balance during general anesthesia (GA) for colorectal surgery.
So far, no study has evaluated in gynecological laparoscopic surgery the impact of NOL monitoring to guide the administration of intraoperative IV fentanyl on intra and postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores.
Objectives: Primary objective:
Reduction in total intraoperative fentanyl consumption (in mcg) and number of intraoperative administrations of IV fentanyl in the SoC+NOL analgesia guided versus SoC analgesia guided group (SoC = Standard of Care).
Secondary objectives:
Secondary outcome [1] Post-operative opioid consumption (IV hydromorphone in PACU) until patient is ready for discharge from Post-Anesthesia Care Unit.
Secondary outcome [2] Post-operative pain scores at rest and at coughing recorded in PACU by using numerical pain rating scales (NRS) in PACU (evaluated Q15min for 1h).
Secondary outcome [3] Intraoperative total consumption and frequency of administration of vasoactive drugs.
Secondary outcome [4] Post-operative sedation scores with Ramsay Sedation Score recorded every 15 minutes in PACU for at least 1h Secondary outcome [5]
Post-operative side-effects within 24 hours post-operatively:
Secondary outcome [6] Post-operative time to discharge from PACU.
This time will be recorded since it may be different from the actual time of discharge which may be prolonged due to non-medical reasons. Patient discharge will be based upon a or b whichever comes first:
Methods: Enrollment of 70 randomized adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for gynecological laparoscopic surgery (e.g. hysterectomy, uni- or bilateral Oophorectomy), which will be randomized to 2 groups: SoC guided analgesia (control group) versus SoC+NoL guided analgesia (intervention group).
All patients will be consented prior to the surgery. Anesthesia will be standardized for all patients, with: IV lidocaine (0.5mg.kg-1), Propofol (2mg.kg-1), IV fentanyl (2mcg.kg-1), IV rocuronium (0.6mg.kg-1). Depth of anesthesia with sevoflurane will be maintained and monitored with the BIS index kept between 40 and 60. In both the groups, rocuronium will be administered to keep the response to the train of four below 2/4 (TOFScan, Draeger). IV fentanyl will be intraoperatively administered based on HR and MABP variations on the SOC group and HR + MABP + NOL index in the NOL group (see attached decision algorithm). At the end of surgery, all patients will be extubated in the OR, then transferred to PACU. In PACU pain scores and recovery scores (PONV, sedation, respiratory depression, itching, delirium…) and hydromorphone requirements to reach a pain < 3/10 will be assessed as well as Aldrete score and time for readiness for PACU discharge. The study will end at PACU discharge. This study will be registered on clinicaltrial.gov website.
Power calculation: Statistical analyses will be done using SAS version 9.4 or higher and will be performed at a two-sided 0.05 significance level. The primary objective of the study is reduced in total intraoperative fentanyl consumption (in mcg) and number of intraoperative administration of IV fentanyl in the SoC+NOL analgesia guided versus SoC analgesia guided group. Preliminary results from our center (HMR/CEMTL) showed that patients in SOC group had an IV intraoperative fentanyl consumption of 616 +/- 190 mcg during anesthesia. For an expected decrease of 25% in the SoC+NOL group for this PACU IV hydromorphone consumption, with a type I error α = 0.05 (two-tailed), an 90% power, the total sample size needed is 64. To account for an approximative 10% rate of loss to follow-up or missing data due to technical problems, a total of 70 subjects will be recruited. Because of the large number of secondary objectives and to protect against type I error in a less conservative way than the Bonferroni correction, the Holm step-down procedure will be applied to the sets of secondary hypotheses.
Significance/Importance: The main outcomes of this study will be to demonstrate that intraoperative NOL guidance decreases the need of intra- and post-operative opioids and might improve postoperative recovery after this type of gynecological surgery.
Study Design: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, single-blinded.
Subject Population: Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery (hysterectomy and uni- or bilateral oophorectomy) under general anesthesia.
Sample Size: 70 patients will be included in this study.
Study Duration: 12 months.
Study Center: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal (CEMTL), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Adverse Events: None expected.
Subvention: An Independent Investigator Initiated Trial (IIIT) grant application will be sent to the company Medasense Biometrics LTD for the sponsoring of this study. A contract will be made and signed by both the parties: Medasense Biometrics LTD on one hand and the CR-HMR and the CEO of the CEMTL/HMR prior to starting the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Predeterminated bolus of IV Fentanyl will be given at the induction of anesthesia (2 mcg/kg), at the time of incision (1 mcg/kg). During surgery, administration of 0.5 mcg/kg of IV Fentanyl will be administred following a pre determinated algorithm based on NOL index + heart rate + mean arterial blood pressure variations.
Bolus of IV Fentanyl at the discretion of a physician will be given at the induction of anesthesia, and at the time of incision. During surgery, administration of IV Fentanyl at the discretion of a physician will be administred following a pre determinated algorithm based on heart rate + mean arterial blood pressure variations.
Time frame: Intra-operative
Change of intraoperative IV fentanyl consumption in the SoC+NOL guided group compared to the SoC guided group.
Time frame: Intra-operative
Change of frequency of intraoperative IV fentanyl administration in the Soc+NOL guided group compared to the SoC guided group.
Time frame: PACU stay (1.5 hours)
Change of postoperative IV hydromorphone consumption in the SoC+NOL guided group compared to the SoC guided group in the post operative care unit (PACU).
Time frame: PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T0 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 15 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T15 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 30 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T30 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 45 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T45 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 60 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T60 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 75 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T75 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 90 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at rest at T90 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: at PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T0 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 15 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T15 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 30 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T30 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 45 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T45 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 60 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T60 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 75 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T75 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: 90 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative pain at coughing at T90 minutes in PACU by using Numerical pain rating scales (NPRS). Score is from 0 to 10.
Time frame: During anesthesia for surgery
Evaluation of intraoperative total phenylephrine consumption (in mcg)
Time frame: During anesthesia for surgery
Evaluation of intraoperative total ephedrine consumption (in mg)
Time frame: During anesthesia for surgery
Evaluation of intraoperative total diltiazem consumption (in mg)
Time frame: During anesthesia for surgery
Evaluation of intraoperative frequency of phenylephrine consumption (n)
Time frame: During anesthesia for surgery
Evaluation of intraoperative frequency of ephedrine consumption (n)
Time frame: During anesthesia for surgery
Evaluation of intraoperative frequency of diltiazem consumption (n)
Time frame: at PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T0 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: 15 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T15 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: 30 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T30 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: 45 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T45 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: 60 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T60 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: 75 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T75 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: 90 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative sedation at T90 minutes in PACU by using Ramsay Sedation Score. Score is from 1 to 6.
Time frame: The 24 hours upon discharge from PACU
To record the number of nausea episodes in the he 24 hours upon discharge from PACU (n)
Time frame: The 24 hours upon discharge from PACU
To record the number of emetic episodes (retching or vomiting) in the he 24 hours upon discharge from PACU (n)
Time frame: The 24 hours upon discharge from PACU
To record the number of nausea AND vomiting episodes in the he 24 hours upon discharge from PACU (n)
Time frame: The 24 hours upon emergence
Patient verbal rate of their worst nausea episode since emergence using a 11 points scale (0: no nausea to 10: most severe nausea)
Time frame: 1.5 hour since the admission to PACU
Incidence of respiratory rate < 9 respirations per minute episodes the first 1.5 hour since the admission to PACU (n)
Time frame: 1.5 hour since the admission to PACU
Incidence of requirement for naloxone reversal of opioids the first 1.5 hour since the admission to PACU (n)
Time frame: 1.5 hour since the admission to PACU
Incidence of requirement for additional reversal of muscle relaxants the first 1.5 hour since the admission to PACU (n)
Time frame: At PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T0 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: 15 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T15 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: 30 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T30 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: 45 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T45 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: 60 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T60 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: 75 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T75 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: 90 min after PACU entrance
Assessment of post operative itching at T90 minutes in PACU by using a 11 points scale (0: no itching, to 10: the most severe itching possible)
Time frame: PACU stay (1.5 hours)
To record the time since the admission to the discharge from PACU (min)
Time frame: PACU stay (1.5 hours)
To record the time since the admission in the PACU to the first postoperative pain rescue medication administration in PACU (min)
Time frame: The 24 hours upon discharge from PACU
To record the time since the discharge of PACU to the first postoperative pain rescue medication administration in PACU (min)
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Other
Impact of Nociceptive-Level (NOL) Intraoperative Guided Analgesia on Pain Scores, Opioid Consumption and Recovery in Postoperative Care Unit in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia. The NOLGYN Pilot Study
Acronym: NOLGYN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07364968
Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Riverside, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07030647
Agnosia, Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT02671227
Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
Asiut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT01512914
Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery, Neurologic Manifestations
Monza, MB, Italy
View Trial Details