Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03615222

Impact of Modifiable Psychosocial Factors on Veterans' Long-term Trajectories of Functioning and Quality of Life

This study is Phase 3 of Project SERVE (Study Evaluating Returning Veterans' Experiences). Through two prior phases, SERVE has followed a cohort of post-9/11 Veterans since 2010 and has identified numerous risk and protective factors. SERVE's overall objective is to understand and improve the long-term functional outcomes of post-9/11 Veterans. Consistent with the investigators' conceptual model, the central hypothesis is that psychological flexibility and other trans-diagnostic treatment targets mediate the effects of the most common mental and physical wounds of war on long-term functioning and self-directed violence (i.e., suicide risk). Thus, integrated interventions specifically designed to improve functioning associated with these conditions are most likely to promote long-term recovery among the most impaired Veterans. The investigators will test the central hypothesis and accomplish the overall objective by pursuing the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Identify treatment targets that prospectively predict functional disability, family functioning and self-directed violence (SDV) in post-9/11 Veterans with PTSD, depression, chronic pain, TBI, and/or AUD.

To achieve this aim, the investigators will follow 500 Veterans for 2 years in order to prospectively evaluate the impact of several novel, treatment-relevant factors on functional disability and SDV over time.

H1: Novel factors (mindfulness, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and moral injury) along with established treatment targets (psychological flexibility, self-compassion, and emotion regulation) will prospectively predict functional disability and SDV after accounting for covariates.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Research by the investigators' team and others demonstrates that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, alcohol use disorders (AUD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and chronic pain frequently co-occur among post-9/11 war Veterans and are associated with functional impairment and suicide risk; however, no treatment currently exists that has been specifically designed to promote functional recovery among Veterans experiencing any combination of these most common mental and physical wounds of war. The investigative team has: (A) identified multiple modifiable psychosocial factors (emotion regulation, psychological flexibility, self-compassion) that prospectively predict impairment and suicidal ideation in Veterans; (B) characterized long-term trajectories of resilience and functional disability in Veterans; (C) determined that high utilization of VA mental health services appears to have little, if any, impact on the functional recovery of Veterans on the moderate and severely impaired trajectories; (D) identified psychological flexibility (i.e., the ability to remain present in the moment despite emotional distress and to persist in changing behavior in the pursuit of one's values and goals) as a unique, prospective predictor of membership in the severely impaired functional trajectory and of suicidal ideation, even after accounting for the effects of co-morbidity; and (E) demonstrated that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-a trans-diagnostic, mindfulness-based behavior therapy that seeks to improve functioning by targeting psychological flexibility -can lead to recovery, including sustained improvements in functional disability, quality of life (QoL), suicidal ideation, PTSD, and AUD symptoms among severely impaired Veterans with co-occurring PTSD-AUD.

This study is Phase 3 of Project SERVE (Study Evaluating Returning Veterans' Experiences). Through two prior RR&D MERIT awards, SERVE has followed a cohort of post-9/11 Veterans since 2010 and has identified numerous risk and protective factors. SERVE's overall objective is to understand and improve the long-term functional outcomes of post-9/11 Veterans. Consistent with the investigators' conceptual model, the central hypothesis is that psychological flexibility and other trans-diagnostic treatment targets mediate the effects of the most common mental and physical wounds of war on long-term functioning and self-directed violence (i.e., suicide risk). Thus, integrated interventions specifically designed to improve functioning associated with these conditions are most likely to promote long-term recovery among the most impaired Veterans. The investigators will test the central hypothesis and accomplish the overall objective by pursuing the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Identify treatment targets that prospectively predict functional disability, family functioning and self-directed violence (SDV) in post-9/11 Veterans with PTSD, depression, chronic pain, TBI, and/or AUD.

To achieve this aim, the investigators will follow 500 Veterans for 2 years in order to prospectively evaluate the impact of several novel, treatment-relevant factors on functional disability and SDV over time.

H1: Novel factors (mindfulness, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and moral injury) along with established treatment targets (psychological flexibility, self-compassion, and emotion regulation) will prospectively predict functional disability and SDV after accounting for covariates.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for the longitudinal assessment study are as follows:

  • Potential participants include male and female
  • English-speaking OEF/OIF/OND Veterans
  • Enrolled at CTVHCS or willing to be enrolled for the purpose of participation in this study.

To be eligible, participants must be

  • able to comprehend and sign the informed consent form
  • able to complete the structured interviews and self-report assessments
  • willing to be contacted for follow-up assessments

For newly enrolled participants:

  • given that the investigators have already recruited a large sample of veterans who are reporting relatively little functional impairment, the investigators will require newly enrolled participants to self-report global functional impairment on the WHODAS 2.0 12-item self-report version equivalent to a mean item score of 1.0.
  • Although the investigators anticipate being able to meet the recruitment goals, should recruitment prove more challenging than expected, the investigators will remove this inclusion criterion
  • deemed stable on psychotropic medications (defined as 3 months on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or monoamine oxidase inhibitor; >1 month on an anxiolytic or beta-blocker; >1 month medication discontinuation or "wash out" for all medications) at the time of the BL assessment
  • deemed stable in psychotherapy (3 months stabilization for psychotherapy and 1-month psychotherapy wash-out) at the time of the BL assessment
  • These latter two criteria are instated to ensure that symptoms assessed during the baseline assessment are due to any underlying psychiatric condition and not due to the effects of starting or stopping medications and/or psychotherapy.
  • Changes in treatment will be permissible during the current study, as this reflects real-world practice
  • All changes in medications will be monitored over time, and appropriately covaried, as treatment can have important effects on functioning over time
  • Individuals will be eligible to participate with current and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses, with the exception of:
  • schizophrenia
  • schizophreniform disorder
  • schizoaffective disorder
  • delusional disorder
  • unspecified schizophrenia spectrum/other psychotic disorder, and bipolar disorder

Additional inclusion criteria specific to the SCD treatment study are:

  • Veterans will have a global disability (mean item) score on the WHODAS 2.0 of 1.0, which is 1 SD above the mean of the large non-psychiatric sample of Veterans from SERVE and VA Boston during both of their last 2 assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

for the longitudinal assessment study are as follows:

  • plan to relocate out of the CTVHCS system within four months of protocol initiation
  • meet criteria for a diagnosis of:
  • schizophrenia
  • schizophreniform disorder
  • schizoaffective disorder
  • delusional disorder
  • a manic/hypomanic episode
  • report current suicidal or homicidal risk warranting crisis intervention
  • report symptoms consistent with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) that interfere with their ability to complete the consent process or assessment
  • i.e., due to ethical concerns about obtaining informed consent and difficulties with completing the structured assessment
  • report current non-military related hallucinations or delusions that cause significant distress and/or impairment

Additional exclusion criteria for the SCD treatment study are:

  • recent (1 month) or anticipated change in psycho-pharmacological treatment. Veterans may stay on current medications but will be asked to refrain from changes to the extent possible based on safety
  • logistical circumstances that would interfere with study completion
  • Presence of a non-alcohol substance use disorder (SUD) deemed to be the primary focus of treatment
  • Those with a principal AUD will be eligible.
  • Additional diagnoses of non-alcohol SUD are allowed, unless they are deemed the principal focus of treatment.
  • Potentially eligible Veterans who score above the clinical cutoff on the DAST will be asked additional questions during the eligibility screening to determine whether they meet criteria for a principal non-alcohol SUD (see phone screen)
  • AUD/SUD of sufficient severity that residential, rather than outpatient, treatment is indicated based on potential safety concerns associated with withdrawal.
  • This determination will be made by the PI, with consultation from the Veteran's existing treatment providers, as appropriate.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Columbia Suicide Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and 24-month

    The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; Posner et al., 2008) is a state-of-the-art suicide assessment for individuals perceived to be at high risk for suicidality. Internal consistency ranged from .73 to .95 (Posner et al., 2011). Values on the intensity of suicidal ideation (e.g., frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, reasons for ideation) are summed to create a total score; range from 0 to 25, where higher scores indicate higher SI severity.

  2. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month

    Self-report assessment of functional disability with total score and 6 domains of functioning: understanding and communicating, mobility, getting along with others, life activities (i.e., work, education, household responsibilities), participation in society, and self-care (Ustun et al., 2010). Both global and specific areas of functioning are crucial in thoroughly understanding functional recovery, as Veterans may function well in one area and have difficulty in another. Moreover, some domains may be affected by contextual factors instead of representing functional capacity (e.g., work functioning in a struggling economy independent of impairment). Means on this measure capture items from all domain subscales and can range from 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate higher levels of disability.

  3. Clinician Administered NSSI Disorder Index (CANDI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 24-month

    The Clinician Administered NSSI Disorder Index (CANDI) is a clinical interview that diagnoses Nonsuicidal Self Injury (NSSI) disorder and type and frequency of NSSI. Demonstrated good reliability and validity in prior research. Results report the number of participants that meet for a diagnosis of NSSID.

  4. Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF) - Brief

    Time frame: Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month

    Self-report measure (Marx et al., 2009; Bovin et al., 2018) of problems in different domains of life (e.g., Romantic Relationships with a Spouse/Partner, Family, Work, Friendships and Socializing, Parenting, Education, and Self-Care). The short version has a .90 correlation with the full 80-item instrument (Co-I Marx, personal communication). Adjusted totals range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate greater functional impairment.

  5. Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 24-month

    Widely-used self-report measure of intensity of thoughts and behaviors associated with suicide. Includes 2 additional items that ask about past suicide attempts as well as the level of suicidal intent during the most recent attempt. Prior research shows that endorsement of suicidal thoughts and behaviors can be greater on self-report questionnaires compared to interviews. Total scores range from 0 to 42 where higher scores indicate higher suicidal ideation.

  6. Quality of Life Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month

    Self-report (Burkhardt, et al., 1989) assessing how satisfied people are in different areas of their life, distinct from health status, (e.g., mate, physical well-being, relationships with others, social, community, and civic activities, personal development and fulfillment, recreation, and independence). Good internal consistency and high test-retest reliability (Burckhardt et al. 2003). Total scores range from 16 to 112 with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Modifiable Psychosocial Factors on Veterans' Long-term Trajectories of Functioning and Quality of Life: Promoting Recovery by Targeting Mindfulness and Psychological Flexibility

Acronym: SERVE:IMPACT

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 3, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.