Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04730921

Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block)

This is a multicenter, randomized controlled study. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of LBBAP on left ventricular function as compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

LEAP-BLOCK is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial that is designed to determine whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may reduce the risk of RV ventricular pacing induced cardiac dysfunction as compared with traditional RV pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and normal LV function (LVEF≥50%) who require high percent of ventricular pacing. The primary aim of this trial is to compare the time to first event (composite of all-cause mortality and newly heart failure hospitalization and device upgrade due to heart failure) between LBBAP and RVP group in patients with AV block. Patients with AV block and normal LV function who require high burden of ventricular pacing (expected >40%) will be randomized to LBBAP or RVP group for therapy. Patients will be followed at least every 3 months for clinical status and every 6 months for echocardiographic evaluation until the study closure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • a. Adult patients aged 18-90;
  • b. AV block patients with ventricular pacing indications and the expected rate of ventricular pacing(VP)> 40%, including (a)Third-degree AV block; (b) Second degree AV block (type II); (c) intermittent advanced AV block with expected VP>40%; (d)Symptomatic first degree AV block and PR interval on ECG ≥ 250ms;
  • c. The subject is able to receive a pectoral implant;
  • d. The subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol;
  • e. The subject is expected to remain available for follow-up visits at the study centers.
  • f. Subject or authorized legal guardian or representative has signed and dated the study Subject Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

  • a. Baseline echocardiographic assessment of patients with impaired LV function (LVEF<50%);
  • b. Having difficulties in follow-up: Those who cannot accept 2-year follow-up on time due to physical condition or other reasons;
  • c. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation;
  • d. Pacemaker replacement without new implanted ventricular electrodes;
  • e. Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications;
  • f. Surgery is required within 1 year due to severe structural heart disease;
  • g. Patients with tricuspid mechanical valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including transposition of the great arteries, or permanent left superior vena cava, etc), or AV block resulting from: (a) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM)vpost (modified) Morrow surgery, (b) ventricular septal defect repair; and those who are unlikely to achieve successful LBBAP procedure.

Treatment and study plan

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Device

Left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing form for ventricular pacing. In patients received LBBAP, the pacing lead will be placed at left bundle branch area to achieve narrow paced QRS duration.

Right Ventricular Pacing

Device

Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. The pacing lead was placed in the apex or septum of right ventricle.

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint is the time to a first event of composite outcomes, including all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure.

    Time frame: Within two years after device implantation

    All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.

    Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from dual-chamber pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of the composite outcomes of all-cause death and/or hospitalization for heart failure

    Time frame: Within 2 years after device implantation

    All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.

  2. Rate of the composite outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and/or an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure.

    Time frame: Within 2 years after device implantation

    Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.

    Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Upgrade from dual chamber pacemaker to CRT-P/CRT-D due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).

  3. Rate of the composite outcomes of LVEF <50%, and/or an increase in LVESV ≥15% during follow-up as compared with the value at randomization

    Time frame: Within 2 years after device implantation

    Echocardiography will be assessed every 6 month during follow-up to determine whether the LVEF is less than 50% and/or the LVESV is increased by 15% or more.

  4. The value of LVEF and LVESV assessed by echocardiography at 1-year and 2-year follow-up

    Time frame: 24 months

    Echocardiography will be assessed at 1-year, and 2-year follow-up and the absolute value of LVEF and LVESV will be compared between two groups.

  5. The time to a first event of LVEF <50% and decrease in LVEF by ≥ 10% during 2 years follow-up as compared with the value at randomization.

    Time frame: 24 months

    Echocardiography will be assessed every 6 month during follow-up to determine whether the LVEF is less than 50% and decreased by 15% or more as compared with the value at randomization.

  6. The immediate success rate of the LBBAP procedure

    Time frame: 1 weeks

    Successful LBBAP procedure is identified according to ECG and intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) during the procedure. All LBBAP procedures will be categorized as selective left bundle branch pacing (S-LBBP), non-selective left bundle branch pacing(NS-LBBP), or left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP).

  7. The rate of procedure and Device related complications

    Time frame: 24 months

    Procedure complications include pneumothorax, hemothorax, and air embolism. Device related complications include lead and pocket complications.

  8. Changes in Pacing parameters and ECG characteristics.

    Time frame: 24 months

    Pacing parameters include pacing thresholds (ventricle), Sense ampitude (ventricle), Impedance (ventricle). ECG characteristics include paced QRS duration and QRS morphology, etc.

  9. The occurrence of LV dyssynchrony

    Time frame: 24 months

    The occurrence of LV dyssynchrony will be evaluated by echocardiography during 2-year follow-up.

  10. Atrial high-rate episodes recorded by the pacemaker

    Time frame: 24 months

    Atrial high-rate episodes recorded in the pacemaker will be followed during two years of follow-up

  11. The long-term success rate of LBBAP

    Time frame: 24 months

    In LBBAP group, the successful LBBAP will be identified according ECG features at 2-years follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Pre-existing heart disease based primary outcome

    Time frame: Within 2 years after device implantation

    All-cause death and/or hospitalization for heart failure comparison based on pre-exsiting heart disease (e.g. coronary heart disease, atrial fibirllation, valvular heart disease, and dilated cardiomyopathy.

  2. Baseline QRSd based primary outcome

    Time frame: Within 2 years after device implantation

    All-cause death and/or hospitalization for heart failure comparison based on baseline QRSd (>120ms vs. ≤120ms)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China

Other

Collaborators

  • Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University
  • Beijing Anzhen Hospital
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
  • Chinese Society of Cardiology
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  • Peking University First Hospital
  • Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital
  • TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
  • Wuxi People's Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: LEAP-Block

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 29, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.