ChangGungMH
Taipei, 10507, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06752564
Abstract The study explores the effects of a goal-directed care intervention on self-efficacy, symptom distress, and quality of life in patients with multiple chronic conditions.
Objective:
To evaluate whether patients with multiple chronic conditions exhibit significant improvement in self-efficacy after receiving a goal-directed care intervention compared to their pre-intervention status.
To assess whether symptom distress is significantly reduced following the intervention.
To determine whether patients experience a significant enhancement in quality of life post-intervention.
Background:
Global population aging is an ongoing phenomenon with increasing impact worldwide. According to the United Nations Population Report, the average global age in 2019 was 28 years and is projected to rise by 10 years to 38 years by 2050. The proportion of the population aged 65 and above grew from 8% in 1950 to 11% in 2009, and it is expected to reach 22% by 2050.
With advances in healthcare quality, the challenges of an aging population are intensifying. Problem-oriented care models, while widely used, are time-intensive and contribute to increased complexity in clinical practice. In contrast, a goal-directed care model focuses on patient-centered outcomes that align with individual priorities rather than addressing each disease separately. This approach reduces conflict and workload for clinical teams while enhancing trust and satisfaction among patients.
Goal-directed care is particularly beneficial for patients with multiple chronic conditions, who often face conflicting care options. This study highlights the potential of such an approach to streamline care delivery and improve outcomes in self-efficacy, symptom management, and overall quality of life.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, 10507, Taiwan
The high prevalence and management challenges of MCC in the context of an aging population signal an impending public health crisis. Older adults with MCC are more susceptible to adverse effects from conditions such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and dementia. In the United States, healthcare costs for individuals aged 65 and older are three times higher than for working-age adults and five times higher than for children. Managing chronic diseases significantly increases healthcare costs, even in advanced healthcare systems, with the annual expenses for diagnosis and treatment continuing to rise .
Healthcare professionals using GOC aim to help patients achieve their maximum personal health potential, aligning care with individual goals. The clear direction provided by GOC fosters teamwork and interdisciplinary collaboration. When establishing long-term goals with patients, it is crucial to revisit and adjust these goals, considering realistic survival timelines, as time plays a vital role in goal-setting.
GOC is especially relevant for managing patients with high disease complexity, offering benefits such as:
Promoting patient autonomy and person-centered care. Avoiding unnecessary care processes and identifying valuable care components. Providing psychological care for patients and emotional support for their families.
Measuring self-efficacy provides a standardized and convenient method for assessing patients' self-management potential, recommended as part of chronic disease care management. Patients with MCC often face challenges in self-management due to conflicting care plans from various providers. Enhancing self-efficacy through self-management support is associated with improved outcomes, including better quality of life.
Symptom management aims to reduce frequency and severity while alleviating distress through biomedical, professional, and management strategies . In Taiwan, the prevalence of physical symptom distress is 5%, with women more affected than men. Symptom distress is associated with higher rates of anxiety, depression, and healthcare utilization.
For elderly individuals, managing chronic diseases significantly affects QoL by increasing care pressures and reducing independence. Studies indicate that higher education levels and better financial status positively influence QoL by enhancing self-esteem and empowerment.
Research Methods This study adopts an experimental design conducted in a 3D integrated medical ward. Participants are hospitalized patients with MCC, referred by physicians or specialist nurses based on inclusion criteria. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to a control or experimental group.
The control group receives standard health education, including verbal instructions and printed materials on diet and treatment frequency. The experimental group receives additional "Goal-Oriented Care" intervention courses, focusing on self-efficacy, symptom distress, and QoL. Structured questionnaires are used pre- and post-intervention to evaluate the program's effectiveness.
Intervention Measures The GOC intervention centers on patient-focused goals, incorporating patients' and families' priorities. Using motivational interviewing, the healthcare team educates patients on disease management and the importance of self-efficacy, symptom management, and QoL. Education materials include booklets and visual aids to facilitate understanding. The intervention fosters trust and collaboration among patients, families, and the healthcare team to improve outcomes in MCC management.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental group : Goal-Oriented Care (GOC) The concept of Goal-Oriented Care (GOC) was first introduced by Mold et al. in 1991, addressing the limitations of problem-oriented care, which focuses on eradicating diseases and preventing death. GOC is defined as a process of reaching a consensus on health-related goals between the healthcare team and the patient (Vermunt et al., 2017). It is based on patients' core values and priorities within a clinical context, guiding medical interventions and specific treatment decisions (Secunda et al., 2020).
Healthcare professionals using GOC aim to help patients achieve their maximum personal health potential, aligning care with individual goals. The clear direction provided by GOC fosters teamwork and interdisciplinary collaboration (Gray et al., 2020). When establishing long-term goals with patients, it is crucial to revisit and adjust these goals, considering realistic survival timelines, as time plays a vital role in goal-setting.
The control group received standard health education. The content of the standard health education included verbal instructions provided by nurses during the general hospital stay, as well as the distribution of educational pamphlets. These instructions covered topics such as the frequency of dialysis and dietary control. The standard health education was generic, without a specific schedule or structured content.
Time frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form, basic demographic data, laboratory reports, and structured questionnaires (self-efficacy, symptom distress, and quality of life) will first be collected. Before intervention program.
The measure of self-efficacy evaluates patients with multiple chronic illnesses, reflecting their confidence in performing specific health-related activities. Participants respond to statements such as, "I am confident that I can eat regularly," or "I can exercise without the company of others." Scores for these health management-related items range from 1 (no confidence at all) to 100 (completely confident).
Time frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form, basic demographic data, laboratory reports, and structured questionnaires (self-efficacy, symptom distress, and quality of life) will first be collected. Before intervention program.
The "Symptom Distress Scale," developed by Lai (1998), is used to assess the severity of symptom distress perceived by the patient.
The scale, collaboratively designed by the original author and three experienced cancer clinical care professionals, includes 22 common symptoms faced by cancer patients: nausea, vomiting, appetite issues, insomnia, pain, fatigue, bowel movements, urination, shortness of breath, coughing, bloating, dry mouth, oral/esophageal pain and ulceration, anxiety, concentration problems, appearance, bleeding, shivering/temperature fluctuations, fever, numbness, chest tightness, and heartburn.
The scale uses a five-point Likert scoring system:
The Taiwanese Somat
Time frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form, basic demographic data, laboratory reports, and structured questionnaires (self-efficacy, symptom distress, and quality of life) will first be collected. Before intervention program.
The Taiwanese version of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a self-reported tool that evaluates health-related quality of life (QoL) across eight dimensions:
Physical Functioning (PF) Role Limitations Due to Physical Health (MR) Bodily Pain (BP) General Health (GH) Vitality (V) Social Functioning (SF) Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems (EP) Mental Health (MH)
Each dimension is scored from 0 to 100, where 100 represents excellent health and 0 indicates poor health. The SF-36 includes 36 items corresponding to 8 health domains, divided into two main components:
Physical Component Summary (PCS), which includes physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, and general health.
Mental Component Summary (MCS), which includes vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extremely poor health and 100 indicating perfect health.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Other
Effects of a Goal-Oriented Care Interventions on Self-efficacy, Symptom Disorder, and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Chronic Diseases
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02715245
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Almería, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06845917
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
View Trial DetailsNCT06597123
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Dayton, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05345041
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details