Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07718724

Impact of GDMT in Uncontrolled Asthma Patients Receiving MHD Inhaled Corticosteroids + Long-acting β2 Agonist

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether GDMT can bring significant benefits to disease management in uncontrolled asthma patients receiving medium- to high-dose ICS-LABA.

* The intervention period will be up to 48 weeks; * The frequency of follow-up is every 12 weeks.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Northan Jiangsu People's Hospital

Yangzhou, China

About this study

This study is a prospective, multicenter, cluster-randomized trial conducted in China, designed to evaluate the application effect of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT). A scientific committee will be established to be responsible for developing GDMT educational materials and facilitating the implementation of GDMT. The study will introduce a GDMT pathway in intervention group aimed at guiding physicians and specialized nurses in the diagnosis and management of participants who are receiving medium- to high-dose ICS-LABA therapy but have uncontrolled asthma.

This study plans to include approximately 60 study sites and consecutively recruit approximately 540 participants. These sites will cover as many provinces and cities as possible to balance geographical distribution. For the 60 selected sites meeting the hospital qualification requirements, a stratified block randomization method will be used, with the stratification factor being the prior written diagnosis rate for severe asthma (the proportion of severe asthma written diagnoses among patients with asthma on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA). Sites will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group (30 sites per group). To minimize selection bias, each site will consecutively enroll 9 participants who meet all inclusion criteria and have provided signed informed consent. All participants must complete the baseline study assessments before entering the study. This is a cluster-randomized interventional study, with an expected duration of 48 weeks. The intervention is implemented at the hospital level. Participants in the two groups will be managed as follows:

  • Intervention Group: Physicians at the study sites will receive GDMT-related training and manage participants according to the GDMT diagnosis and treatment pathway.
  • Control Group: Physicians at the study sites will manage participants using usual clinical care.

Participant data (including but not limited to: demographic characteristics, number of exacerbations, asthma medication use, ACT scores, pulmonary function, SGRQ scores, medical costs) will be collected according to the Schedule of Study Activities.

The benefits and effectiveness of GDMT will be determined by assessing changes in physician behavior, improvements in patient outcomes, and savings in healthcare resources.

The intervention consists of 5 distinct components: routine training, GDMT education, clinical monitoring, targeted training, and material revision.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sign the informed consent form before any study-related procedures;
  • Age 18-75 years (inclusive) at Visit 0;
  • Have a written diagnosis of asthma for more than 6 months prior to Visit 0, and have evidence of reversible airflow limitation prior to Visit 0. Evidence of reversible airflow limitation includes: post-bronchodilator increase in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) of ≥12% and an absolute increase of ≥200 mL, or average daily diurnal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) variability >10%, or an increase in FEV1 of ≥12% and an absolute increase of ≥200 mL compared to baseline after 4 weeks of treatment containing ICS, or a positive bronchial provocation test record. If no prior record exists, reversible airflow limitation must be confirmed and documented via a bronchodilator test during Visit 0;
  • Under the usage of MD/HD ICS-LABA;
  • Experienced one or more exacerbations within the past year;

Exacerbation is defined as meeting any of the following criteria:

  • Use of systemic corticosteroids (or a temporary increase in the stable dose of baseline oral corticosteroids) for at least 3 days; a single injection of a depot long-acting corticosteroid can be considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids;
  • An emergency department or urgent care site visit for asthma (defined as being evaluated and treated in the emergency department or urgent care site for < 24 hours) requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days (as described above);
  • Hospitalization for asthma (defined as admission to a hospital and/or being evaluated and treated in a healthcare facility for ≥ 24 hours).

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous written diagnosis as "Severe Asthma"; Diagnosis of Severe Asthma includes: severe asthma, or related diagnoses containing "severe asthma", or "bronchial asthma (severe)".
  • Imaging suggests the presence of bullae or cystic bronchiectasis;
  • Currently participating in other interventional studies;
  • Previous use of biologics for asthma treatment;
  • Using systemic glucocorticoids for other diseases;
  • History of respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks prior to Visit 0 (upper respiratory tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections);
  • Any significant disease or disorder (e.g., cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, endocrine/metabolic, malignant, psychiatric, or significant physical impairment, etc.) which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the patient's ability to comply with GDMT.

Treatment and study plan

Intervention Group

Behavioral

The GDMT pathway targets physicians and specialized nurses for implementation. It ensures that physicians at intervention groups conduct standardized diagnosis and treatment following GDMT, and that specialized nurses deliver patient education and follow-up reminders according to GDMT. This is achieved through regular knowledge training, provision of a series of reminder/support tools, and a bi-weekly (every 12 weeks) monitoring, and feedback system for Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in the proportion of participants with a written diagnosis of "Severe Asthma" between the intervention and control groups at Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on diagnosis rates of severe asthma

  2. Difference in the annualized asthma exacerbation rate between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma exacerbations

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in the proportion of participants with asthma exacerbation between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  2. Difference in the change in mean ACT score from baseline between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  3. Change in mean ACT score from baseline in the intervention group at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  4. Change in the proportion of participants achieving asthma symptom control (ACT ≥20) from baseline in the intervention group at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  5. Difference in the proportion of participants with asthma symptom control (ACT ≥20) between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  6. Difference in the proportion of participants achieved the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in asthma symptom control (ACT improvement ≥3 points) between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  7. The proportion of participants achieved ACT MCID (ACT improvement ≥3 points) in the intervention group at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on asthma control

  8. Difference in pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (Pre-BD FEV1) between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on pulmonary function

  9. Change in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (Pre-BD FEV1) from baseline in the intervention group at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on pulmonary function

  10. Difference in the proportion of participants with combined persistent airflow obstruction (PAO, FEV1/FVC <70%) between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on pulmonary function

  11. Difference in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (total and domain scores) between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on quality of life

  12. Change in SGRQ scores from baseline in the intervention group at Week 24 and Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on quality of life

  13. Difference in the proportion of participants who achieved SGRQ MCID (decrease in total score ≥4 points) between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on quality of life

  14. The proportion of participants achieved SGRQ MCID (decrease in total score ≥4 points) in the intervention group at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on quality of life

  15. Difference in the proportion of participants with a written diagnosis of "Severe Asthma" between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on diagnosis rate

  16. Difference in the time to written diagnosis of "Severe Asthma" between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period;

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on diagnosis rate

  17. Reasons for not meeting the diagnostic criteriac for severe asthma among participants in the intervention group not diagnosed with "severe asthma" at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on diagnosis rate

  18. Difference in the proportion of participants with peripheral blood eosinophil (bEOS) test records within the past 3 months, excluding those during asthma exacerbation, between the intervention and control groups at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biomarkers tests rate

  19. Difference in the proportion of participants with Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) test records within the past 3 months between the intervention and control groups at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biomarkers tests rate

  20. Difference in the proportion of participants with Immunoglobulin E (IgE) test records within the past 3 months between the intervention and control groups at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biomarkers tests rate

  21. Difference in the cumulative number of bEOS test records between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biomarkers tests rate

  22. Difference in the cumulative number of IgE test records between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biomarkers tests rate

  23. Difference in the cumulative number of FeNO test records between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biomarkers tests rate

  24. Difference in the proportion of participants with typing records between the intervention and control groups over the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on typing records

  25. Difference in the time to first asthma typing record between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on typing records

  26. Difference in the proportion of participants with record of eosinophilic asthma phenotype between the intervention and control groups over the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on typing records

  27. Difference in the time to first eosinophilic asthma phenotype record between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on typing records

  28. Difference in the proportion of participants with a recorded Type 2 (T2) asthma phenotype between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on typing records

  29. Difference in the proportion of participants with record of allergic asthma phenotype between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on typing records

  30. Difference in the cumulative number of pulmonary function test records between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on pulmonary function test utilization

  31. Difference in the proportion of participants using biologics between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biologic utilization

  32. Difference in the duration of biologic use between the intervention and control groups

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on biologic utilization

  33. Distribution of different treatment pattern in the intervention group during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on treatment pattern

  34. Distribution of different treatment pattern in the control group at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on treatment pattern

  35. Difference in the proportion of participants regularly completing scheduled follow-ups visitse between the intervention and control groups over the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on regular follow-up visits

  36. Difference in the drop-out rate between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on regular follow-up visits

  37. Subgroup analyses will be conducted as appropriate; planned subgroups to explore include: Hospital classification, Participant classification.

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    Describe the differences in physician behavior, participant benefit, and healthcare resource conservation across different hospital and participant subgroups after GDMT education

Other outcomes

  1. Difference in the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission of asthma (CR3/CR4)f between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on clinical remission of asthma

  2. Characteristics of participants using biologics during the study period, including age, gender, disease duration, MH, insurance type, annual household income, asthma symptoms, comorbidities, EOS/FeNO/IgE levels, pulmonary function etc.

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To describe the characteristics of participants using biologics

  3. Proportion of participants receiving maintenance OCS therapyi at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on oral corticosteroid (OCS) use

  4. Difference in the accumulative dose of maintenance OCS received between the intervention and control groups at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on oral corticosteroid (OCS) use

  5. Difference in the reduction of maintenance OCS dose among biologic users between the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on oral corticosteroid (OCS) use

  6. Difference in proportion of participants with asthma-related hospitalization between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: Week 48

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  7. Difference in the average annual asthma-related hospitalization frequency between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  8. Difference in the average annual length of asthma-related hospital stay between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  9. Difference in proportion of participants with asthma-related ICU stay between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  10. Difference in the average annual length of asthma-related ICU stay between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  11. Difference in proportion of participants with asthma-related emergency department visits between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  12. Difference in the average number of emergency department visits between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  13. Difference in the number of prescribed medications types between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  14. Difference in the average annualized asthma-related medical costsj between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To assess the effect of GDMT education on healthcare resource utilization

  15. Difference in the change from baseline in Impulse Oscillometry (IOS) parameters (R5, R20, X5, Fres, AX) between the intervention and control groups at Week 24 and 48

    Time frame: Week 24, week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on pulmonary function (IOS)

  16. Reasons for not initiating biologics in participants with severe asthma in the intervention group during the study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To describe reasons for not initiating biologics in severe asthma during the study period, and reasons for participants discontinuing biologics

  17. Reasons for discontinuing biologics in intervention group during the study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To describe reasons for not initiating biologics in severe asthma during the study period, and reasons for participants discontinuing biologics

  18. Difference in number of asthma-related comorbidities typesk in written records between the intervention and control groups during the 48-week study period

    Time frame: During the 48-week study period

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on comorbidity recording

  19. Treatment satisfaction in the intervention and control groups at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    To evaluate the effect of GDMT education on participant treatment satisfaction

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center

CONTACT

[email protected]

1-877-240-9479

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Cluster-Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Uncontrolled Asthma Patients Receiving Medium-to-High Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids Plus Long-acting β2 Agonist

Acronym: PRECISION

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.