Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02546505

Impact of Front-of-pack Nutrition Labelling on Consumer Purchases

Introducing Front-Of-Pack (FOP) nutrition labelling, providing simplified information on nutritional content at a glance, in order to help consumer make informed choices, has been identified as of major interest by public health specialists. In France, a recent report to the Minister of Health has proposed the introduction of a Front-of-Pack nutrition label, the 5-Colour nutrition label. Existing studies on FOP labels mainly focused on assessment of consumers' acceptability/liking and understanding. If most of the studies on purchasing behavior, conducted in real supermarkets, suggested a positive effect of FOP labels on consumers' food choices, the impact of the 5-CNL has not been evaluated.

The main objective is to evaluate the impact of a Front-of-pack nutrition label, the 5-Colour Nutrition Label on consumer purchases in a controlled environment close to real-world settings. Nutritional quality of the items purchased will be compared using the Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSA score). The study relies on a comparison across three independent samples :

* Control group: The current situation with current way brands show or not nutritional information on Front of Pack (FoP) - without consumer information * Intervention n°1: Introduction of a Front-of-pack nutrition label (5-CNL) on selected categories of foods. No additional consumer information * Intervention n°3: Introduction of a Front-of-pack nutrition label (5-CNL) on selected categories of foods. Additional consumer information specifically targeting nutritional information and explaining the 5-CNL will be performed (this information will consist in a concept shown to respondents before the shopping session).

Participants are recruited in the street through quota sampling, based on criteria of gender, age and purchasing habits on the products categories selected for the introduction of the FOP nutrition label.

The study relies on LabStores®, i.e. shopper laboratory stores, which are controlled study spaces in which a store is recreated in reality.The real lab store mimics a store environment with real shelves, product, and cash register, and presents several product categories in a realistic shopping environment. At the end of the shopping session, the respondents proceed to the cashier but don't actually pay for their purchases.

The selected foodstuffs come from actual retailers' brand products available on the French market. Three categories of products were selected, based on expected variability in nutritional quality of the products and logistic criteria (exclusion of fresh products):

* Breakfast cereals * Sweet biscuits * Salty snacks The impact of the different labels on nutritional quality (FSA score, calories, lipids, saturated fatty acids, sugars, proteins, fibre, sodium) of the shopping cart is investigated using one way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons among FOP labels are assessed by using Tukey's multiple comparisons tests.

All tests of significance are two-sided, and a P value <0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analyses are performed using SAS software (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc.).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults >18 years old
  • Usually purchasing the selected categories of foods (Breakfast cereals, appetizers, biscuits)

Exclusion criteria

  • Not used to purchasing the selected categories of foods

Treatment and study plan

Front-of-pack nutrition labeling

Other

Introduction of a Front-of-pack nutrition label (5-CNL) on selected categories of foods.

Consumer information

Other

Information specifically targeting nutritional information and explaining the 5-CNL is presented to the subject (this information will consist in a concept shown to respondents before the shopping session).

Primary outcomes

  1. FSA score to evaluate nutritional quality of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Mean Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSA score) of the items purchased

Secondary outcomes

  1. Energy content of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Energy content (Kcal) for 100g of the items purchased

  2. Saturated fatty acid content of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Saturated fatty acids content (g) for 100g of the items purchased

  3. Sodium content of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Sodium content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased

  4. Sugar content of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Sugar content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased

  5. Protein content of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Protein content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased

  6. Fiber content of the items purchased

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

    Fiber content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased

  7. Number of purchased items labelled in green/yellow/orange/pink/red

    Time frame: Estimated time frame 6 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Paris 13

Other

Collaborators

  • BVA nudge unit

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Front-of-pack Nutrition Labelling on Consumer Purchases - Controlled Trial in Shopper Laboratory Stores

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Sep 11, 2015
Registry last updated
Dec 2, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.