Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00662402

Impact of Extensive Consultation on Career Development Grant Outcomes

In this study we wish is to determine whether extensive (up to 15 hours) multidisciplinary consultation in biostatistics, study design, data management, ethics, and writing provided by the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute's (CTSI) Consultation Services program, improves peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation.

We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will improve peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation.

We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will lead to greater numbers of funded grants when compared to the usual levels of consultation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94144, United States

About this study

CTSI Consultation Services is one of the largest programs within the UCSF CTSI. It was created to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical and translational research through the provision of expert consultation. The program is divided into units that provide access to expert consultants in biostatistics, research design (with consultants representing multiple distinct methodologies and disease interests), data management (including data structure and database design), ethics, and scientific writing. With funding from the NIH, the program is able to offer a free hour of consultation in each of its units (up to 4 hours) but charges for additional services to cover costs.

There have been no studies of research consultation services. Though the benefit may seem self evident, such programs are expensive and distract senior researcher from more creative work. Justifying research consultation is important given the multitude of activities vying for attention and funding. Observational studies of the impact of research consultation services will always be limited by confounding, particularly confounding by indication since those seeking such services may be more highly motivated and organized. Thus, a randomized trial is warranted.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Applying for a Career Development grant from the NIH.
  • Anticipated submission date is 3 or more months in the future
  • Resident, fellow, or junior faculty member at UCSF or a CTSI-affiliated institution.
  • Recognized potential benefit from additional consultation
  • Additional areas that could be improved as judged by the subject and the initial consultant
  • Adequate time to provide consultation before submission date

Treatment and study plan

Extensive Consultations

Other

receives 15 free hours of multidisciplinary consultations towards the preparation of their career development grant.

Other names: Consultations, Extensive Multi-disciplinary Consultations

Primary outcomes

  1. NIH priority score of the reviewed proposal, with unsubmitted or unscored proposals counted as priority scores that are right-censored at 300 (old system) or 50 (new system)

    Time frame: 30 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of subjects who obtain funding for the submitted proposal

    Time frame: 30 Months

  2. Institute-specific percentile of the priority score

    Time frame: 30 Months

  3. Percentage of subjects who submit proposals for funding

    Time frame: 30 Months

  4. Percentage of subjects who received a good score (<40 or <200) which may be associated with future funding of a resubmission

    Time frame: 30 Months

  5. Percentage of subjects who obtained any career development award funding

    Time frame: 30 Months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 21, 2008
Registry last updated
Oct 11, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.