Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06119165

Impact of Environmental Nudges on Dietary Quality

Purpose: The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a suite of environmentally focused nudges on the nutritional quality of consumers' food selections.

Participants: ~2,000 US adults ages 18-25, at least 25% currently enrolled full-time in college, recruited from CloudResearch Prime Panels.

Procedures: Participants will be randomly assigned to view food products with or without environmental nudges (eco-labels, peer comparison message, and swaps). They will be asked to select items that they most wish to purchase and will then be asked a series of questions about the products and nudges. Questions will also include standard socio-demographic variables.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UNC Carolina Population Center

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

About this study

Participants will be recruited from CloudResearch Prime Panels (an online panel research company). Study participants include 2,000 young adults between 18 and 25 years old with at least 25% currently enrolled in college, recruited to match census distribution of race/ethnicity and gender. Participants will electronically acknowledge their consent to participate in the study.

On the study platform (Qualtrics), participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 arms with equal probability. Participants will complete a shopping task via an online 9-minute survey. They will view products displayed as if they were offered from a grocery store. Products will be frozen meals, such as burritos and pizza, snack items such as dried fruit and chips, and protein items, such as ground beef and chicken breasts. They will then be instructed to select 1 item they most wish to purchase from each category.

Participants in the experimental arm will shop and receive environmental nudges in the form of labels, feedback, peer comparisons, and suggested product swaps. In the control arm, participants will conduct online shopping tasks without any environmental nudges. After selecting products, participants will answer questions about the products and labels, as well as standard socio-demographic questions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 to 25 years old
  • Currently resides in the United States

Exclusion criteria

  • Completion of the survey in <1/3 of the median completion time

Treatment and study plan

Environmental nudges

Behavioral

Participants will view protein, frozen meal, and snack products with eco-labels applied. For each category, they will then be instructed to select 1 item from that category they wish most to purchase. Categories will be shown in random order. If a participant selects a product with a red eco-label, they will be shown a peer comparison message and will be given an opportunity to switch to a product with a yellow or green eco-label.

Primary outcomes

  1. Nutri-Score Scores

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Healthfulness of product selections (operationalized as products' Nutri-Score scores). Products' Nutri-Score scores are calculated using the updated 2022 algorithm released by the Scientific Committee of the Nutri-Score (ScC). Scores range from -15 (Nutri-Score of "A") to 40 (Nutri-Score of "E"), with lower scores indicating a more healthful product selection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Carbon Footprint

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Carbon footprint of product selections [operationalized as products' greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) per 100g].

  2. Acceptability of Eco-Label Intervention

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Acceptability of eco-labels on products, measured by an item adapted from Vargas-Meza et al., 2019. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher acceptability of eco-labels.

  3. Acceptability of Swaps Intervention

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Acceptability of environmental swaps, measured by an item adapted from Vargas-Meza et al., 2019. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher acceptability of swaps.

  4. Acceptability of Peer Comparison Message Intervention

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Acceptability of peer comparison messages, measured by an item adapted from Vargas-Meza et al., 2019. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher acceptability of peer comparison messages.

  5. Health Elaboration

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    How much the participant reports thinking about the healthfulness of products when making selections. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher amount of thinking about the healthfulness of products.

  6. Taste Elaboration

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    How much the participant reports thinking about the taste of products when making selections. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher amount of thinking about the taste of products.

  7. Cost Elaboration

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    How much the participant reports thinking about the cost of products when making selections. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher amount of thinking about the cost of products.

  8. Environmental Sustainability Elaboration

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    How much the participant reports thinking about the environmental sustainability of products when making selections. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "A great deal" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher amount of thinking about the environmental sustainability of products.

  9. Perceived Healthfulness of Sustainable Products

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' perceptions about the healthfulness of sustainable products. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "Extremely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived healthfulness of sustainable products.

  10. Perceived Healthfulness of Unsustainable Products

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' perceptions about the healthfulness of unsustainable products. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "Extremely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived healthfulness of unsustainable products.

  11. Perceived Sustainability of Sustainable Products

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' perceptions about the sustainability of sustainable products. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "Extremely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived sustainability of sustainable products.

  12. Perceived Sustainability of Unsustainable Products

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' perceptions about the sustainability of unsustainable products. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all" (coded as 1) to "Extremely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived sustainability of unsustainable products.

  13. Purchase Intentions of Sustainable Products

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' intentions to purchase a sustainable product in the next month. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all likely" (coded as 1) to "Extremely likely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher intention to purchase.

  14. Purchase Intentions of Unsustainable Products

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' intentions to purchase an unsustainable product in the next month. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Not at all likely" (coded as 1) to "Extremely likely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher intention to purchase.

  15. Injunctive Norms

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' perceived approval from people important in their life for purchasing environmentally sustainable products. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Strongly disagree" (coded as 1) to "Strongly agree" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing higher perceived approval about purchasing environmentally sustainable products.

  16. Descriptive Norms

    Time frame: Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit

    Participants' belief that most shoppers purchase environmentally sustainable foods when shopping for groceries. Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from "Strongly disagree" (coded as 1) to "Strongly agree" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing higher belief that most shoppers purchase environmentally sustainable foods.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Other

Collaborators

  • Wellcome Trust

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Registry last updated
Jan 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.