Nelia Navarro patiño
Madrid, 28007, Spain
NCT Number: NCT02692326
The aim of our study is to compare the incidence of PNAC in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous parenteral nutrition (PN) in those newborns who need prolonged PN. The secondary aims are to compare incidence of sepsis and catheter related sepsis, mean length of hospital stay, mortality, nutritional status at two years of chronological age and predisposing factors to the development of parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) between the two groups, and to evaluate the adverse effects of the method of cycling used.
This was a single-center, prospective randomized not blinded study was conducted in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit from July 2010 to January 2015. Infants with hemodynamic instability until a stable situation, congenital hepatic disease, preterm infants with diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome or persistent ductus arteriosus and lack of authorization from the parents or guardians were excluded.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me10 day–50 day
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28007, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cyclic parenteral nutrition was provided according to a method described by Longhurst et al. Patients were initially cycled of PN for 1 hour per day with increased rate of 1 hour with a maximum time out of PN of 4 hours for preterm babies < 37 weeks GA and 6 hours for term newborns. Glucose was monitored at half the time without PN to detect the hypoglycemia.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The incidence of parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The percentage of patients who was diagnosed of sepsis in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The percentage of patients who was diagnosed of CRS in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The mean length of hospital stay in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
total days on enteral nutrition in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
total days on parenteral nutrition in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
% of patients with anticholestatic drug in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
days of duration of treatment with anticholestatic drug in newborns receiving cyclic versus continuous PN in those newborns who need prolonged PN.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Percentage of adverse effects, type of adverse affects
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the percentage of patients who died and the cause of death
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The cause of death
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Other
DECREASE OF CHOLESTASIS USING CYCLED PARENTERAL NUTRITION IN NEWBORNS REQUIRING PROLONGED PARENTERAL NUTRITION
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07697872
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Atresia
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07250854
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Atresia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06183242
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Saint Petersburg, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT02057718
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details