Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis
Tunis, Tunisia
NCT Number: NCT07643116
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise.
The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tunis, Tunisia
Case-Based Learning (CBL) is a learner-centered educational approach that promotes active learning and clinical reasoning through the discussion of authentic clinical cases. Concept maps are educational tools that help learners organize, integrate, and connect knowledge.
This prospective randomized study was conducted among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis. Eligible students who had reviewed the official preeclampsia learning module were randomly allocated to one of three educational interventions:
All groups were exposed to the same clinical case, learning objectives, instructor, and teaching duration. Learning outcomes were assessed using a pre-test, an immediate post-test, a delayed post-test administered two weeks later, and a synthesis exercise evaluating knowledge organization and clinical reasoning.
The primary outcome is the effect of concept mapping and its integration modality on clinical reasoning and knowledge organization, assessed through the synthesis exercise score. Secondary outcomes include knowledge acquisition and knowledge retention assessed through test scores and score variations over time.
The findings of this study may contribute to identifying effective educational strategies for improving learning and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map designed and presented by the instructor.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
Time frame: Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
Assessment of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning using the Narrative Question Score (NQS). The score ranges from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better clinical reasoning and knowledge organization.
Time frame: Immediately after completion of the learning session
Assessment of knowledge acquisition using the difference between post-test and pre-test scores. Test scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge acquisition.
Time frame: Two weeks after completion of the learning session
Assessment of knowledge retention using the delayed post-test score obtained two weeks after the learning session. Scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.
University Tunis El Manar
Other
Impact of Concept Mapping and Its Integration Modality in Case-Based Learning on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Clinical Reasoning Development Among Third-Year Medical Students: A Prospective Randomized Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07679672
Clinical Reasoning, Medical Education
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06754826
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Clinical Reasoning
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07624682
AI Agent, Clinical Reasoning
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07594470
Case-based Learning, Emergency Medicine
Wuhu, Anhui, China
View Trial Details