Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07643116

Impact of Concept Mapping in Case-Based Learning Among Medical Students

This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation.

Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise.

The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis

Tunis, Tunisia

About this study

Case-Based Learning (CBL) is a learner-centered educational approach that promotes active learning and clinical reasoning through the discussion of authentic clinical cases. Concept maps are educational tools that help learners organize, integrate, and connect knowledge.

This prospective randomized study was conducted among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis. Eligible students who had reviewed the official preeclampsia learning module were randomly allocated to one of three educational interventions:

  • Case-Based Learning without concept mapping.
  • Case-Based Learning with a concept map designed by the instructor and presented at the end of the session.
  • Case-Based Learning with a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.

All groups were exposed to the same clinical case, learning objectives, instructor, and teaching duration. Learning outcomes were assessed using a pre-test, an immediate post-test, a delayed post-test administered two weeks later, and a synthesis exercise evaluating knowledge organization and clinical reasoning.

The primary outcome is the effect of concept mapping and its integration modality on clinical reasoning and knowledge organization, assessed through the synthesis exercise score. Secondary outcomes include knowledge acquisition and knowledge retention assessed through test scores and score variations over time.

The findings of this study may contribute to identifying effective educational strategies for improving learning and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Third-year medical students enrolled in the Obstetrics and Gynecology rotation.
  • Completion of the preeclampsia learning module before the educational session.
  • Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to participate.
  • Failure to complete the pre-test, post-test, synthesis assessment, or delayed -post-test.
  • Absence from the educational session.
  • Incomplete study data.

Treatment and study plan

Case-Based Learning Without Concept Mapping

Behavioral

Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.

Teacher-Constructed Concept Mapping

Behavioral

Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map designed and presented by the instructor.

Student Co-Constructed Concept Mapping

Behavioral

Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Reasoning Score

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session

    Assessment of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning using the Narrative Question Score (NQS). The score ranges from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better clinical reasoning and knowledge organization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge Acquisition Score

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the learning session

    Assessment of knowledge acquisition using the difference between post-test and pre-test scores. Test scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge acquisition.

  2. Knowledge Retention Score

    Time frame: Two weeks after completion of the learning session

    Assessment of knowledge retention using the delayed post-test score obtained two weeks after the learning session. Scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Tunis El Manar

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Concept Mapping and Its Integration Modality in Case-Based Learning on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Clinical Reasoning Development Among Third-Year Medical Students: A Prospective Randomized Study

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.