Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07476638

Impact of AI Feedback on Ultrasound Biometry Accuracy Across the Expertise Levels

Objective: To evaluate the impact of real-time AI feedback on fetal biometry accuracy and investigate the Expertise Reversal Effect-whether AI benefits diminish as user experience increases.

Design: A stratified randomized trial of 75 participants (25 Novices, 25 Intermediates, 25 Experts). Users are randomized 1:1 to either AI-assisted or manual measurement groups.

Outcomes:

* Primary: EFW accuracy (MAPE) compared to actual birthweight. * Secondary: Procedure time, image quality, error relative to baseline scans, and cognitive workload (NASA-TLX).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, København Ø, 2100, Denmark

About this study

Study Overview: This study evaluates how real-time Artificial Intelligence (AI) feedback impacts the accuracy of fetal biometry measurements in obstetric ultrasound. While AI tools are designed to assist clinicians, their effectiveness may vary depending on the user's baseline skill level-a phenomenon known as the "Expertise Reversal Effect."

Research Aim: The primary objective is to determine if AI-guided feedback significantly reduces measurement error in ultrasound fetal weight estimation to traditional manual methods. The study specifically investigates whether the benefit of AI is greater for novice users, intermediate users users than for experienced specialists.

Study Design: This is a stratified, randomized controlled trial involving 75 participants categorized into three expertise tiers:

Novices (e.g., students or residents with minimal scan experience).

Intermediate Users (e.g., physicians in mid-level training).

Experts (e.g., senior specialists).

Participants within each tier will be randomized 1:1 to either the AI-Assisted Group (receiving real-time automated plane validation and calipers) or the Control Group (performing standard manual biometry).

Primary Outcome Measure: Accuracy of Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW): The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of the EFW relative to the actual birthweight, assessing the clinical impact of AI assistance on weight prediction.

Secondary Outcome Measures:

  • Procedural Efficiency: Total procedure time (probe-to-skin) required to complete the biometry.
  • Image Quality: Objective assessment of captured planes based on standardized salomon criteria.
  • Relative Measurement Error: Deviation of estimated fetal weight when compared to a standard (expert-validated) ultrasound scan.
  • Subjective Workload: Evaluation of cognitive load and user effort using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX).
  • Determination of Experience Threshold: Defining the 'cutoff' in clinical experience (years and total scans) for significant AI-mediated accuracy gains.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Clinical Target Population: Healthcare professionals and students, including but not limited to:

  • Medical students (doing their masters.
  • Resident physicians and Senior Consultants in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Exclusion:

  • If the participants do not understand and speak either Danish or English

Pregnant women:

Inclusion criteria

  • Pre pregnancy BMI < 40
  • Singelton pregnancy
  • GA ≥ 37+0 at time of induction
  • Intact membranes (to ensure consistent amniotic fluid index)

Exclusion criteria

  • Major fetal anatomical anomaly
  • Anhydramnios (DVP < 2 cm)
  • CPR ratio < 2.5th percentile

Treatment and study plan

AI interventional group

Device

Participants in the intervention arm perform fetal biometry with the assistance of real-time Artificial Intelligence (AI) feedback software.

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the sensitivity to change in ultrasound measurement accuracy when using AI-feedback compared to standard scanning

    Time frame: The two scans will be performed within a timeframe of 14 days.

    Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), defined as the absolute difference between estimated fetal weight (EFW) and actual birth weight (ABW) divided by actual birth weight and expressed as a percentage, for AI-assisted and manual fetal biometry.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural Efficacy

    Time frame: The duration of the scan, maximum of 30 minutes

    Scan duration (seconds) will be modeled as the dependent variable to assess the tem-poral impact of the AI-feedback.

  2. Image Quality

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    Salomon Quality Score on the 16-point fetal biometry plane quality scale, comparing AI-assisted and manual ultrasound acquisition. The scale ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better anatomical plane quality.

  3. Cognitive and Physiological Load

    Time frame: During the ultrasound procedure (GSR) and immediately following the procedure (NASA-TLX), approximately 30 minutes in total.

    Both the NASA-TLX (subjective) and GSR (objective) data will be modeled as de-pendent variables. These analyses will determine if the AI-intervention significantly alters the mental effort or autonomic stress response during the procedure.

  4. Measurement Deviation:

    Time frame: The duration from pre study scan and study scan.

    The absolute difference between the participant's EFW and a baseline EFW performed of an experienced clinician, will be modeled to assess if AI reduces inter-observer variability.

  5. Experience Threshold for AI-Mediated Accuracy Gains

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    Estimated interaction effect between operator experience (continuous, experience level) and intervention (AI-assisted vs manual) on mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and the corresponding experience level at which the adjusted difference in MAPE between groups is not statistically significant.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mary Le Ngo, Medical Doctor (MD), PhD stude

CONTACT

[email protected]

+45 20773779

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation

Other

Collaborators

  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Slagelse Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Sensitivity to Change of AI-Feedback in Ultrasound Biometry: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial Across the Expertise Gradient

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.