Department of Gastroenterology
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, S/C de Tenerife, 38320, Spain
NCT Number: NCT03830489
This is a single center randomized controlled trial to compare the colon cleansing quality determined by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale achieved by two strategies in patients with high risk of poor colon cleansing defined as those patients with a score> 1.225 following a predictive score previously published: one group will receive an intensified split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus bisacodyl and 3 days of fiber-free diet and the other group a split-dose 2 L PEG solution with ascorbic plus bisacodyl and 1 day of fiber-free diet.
Patients with a score ≤ 1.225 will receive a split-dose 2 L PEG solution with ascorbic plus bisacodyl and 1 day of fiber-free diet.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, S/C de Tenerife, 38320, Spain
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind phase IV study in which all outpatients scheduled for a colonoscopy will be given a different bowel cleansing strategy (conventional or intensified) according to a scoring system already validated in the investigator's center, designed with variables independently associated with poor bowel cleansing, constipation, abdominal/pelvic surgery, comorbidity and to be on antidepressant treatment. According to this system, a score equal to or less than 1.225, predicts with a high confidence (negative predictive value = 88%) a suitable cleansing quality with a standard preparation protocol. Therefore, these subjects will be advised of a conventional preparation (low fiber diet the day before the examination and low volume preparation consisting of 2 L of PEG with ascorbic acid). Subjects with a score greater than 1.225 will be randomized to receive an intensive bowel preparation (low fiber diet three days prior to colonoscopy and large bowel preparation consisting of 4 L PEG with bisacodyl) or a conventional one (low fiber diet the day before the examination and 2 L of PEG with ascorbic acid). The choice of low-volume preparation as a control is supported by the absence of significant differences in quality of cleanliness in patients with a score > 1.225 among patients prepared with high or low volume and that low volume preparation appears to improve tolerance and compliance.
A researcher will offer to participate in the study to all outpatients with a scheduled colonoscopy, who meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The researchers will explain the purpose of the study and will ask to sign the informed consent. They will give verbal and written information on the bowel preparation strategy. Thus, according to the allocation group, participants must comply with a large volume cleansing strategy or a conventional one. For patients with a low score (≤ 1.225) a conventional preparation will be recommended.
Patients must complete a baseline questionnaire at the inclusion visit and another questionnaire at the colonoscopy visit.
The hypothesis of the study is that in patients with a high risk of poor bowel preparation, the large bowel based preparation strategy is superior to the conventional bowel preparation in achieving an acceptable bowel cleansing assessed by a validated scale (Boston Bowel Preparation Score).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental arm will take 4 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) in split dose plus bisacodyl and 3 days of fiber-free diet
The control arm will take 2 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus ascorbic acid in split dose plus 1 day of fiber-free diet
Time frame: 8 months
This scale goes from 0 (no preparation) to 3 points (excellent preparation) in the three segments of the colon (proximal, transverse and distal). The maximum score is 9 points
Time frame: 8 months
Number of polyps in one arm/total of polyps detected
Time frame: 8 months
It will be subjective and assessed by a visual analog scale (0 very bad, 10 excellent)
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Other
Intensive High-volume Bowel Cleansing Regimen Versus Low-volume Bowel Regimen in Patients With a High Risk of Poor Colonic Cleansing Following a Validated Predictive Score
Acronym: REPREP2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05871814
Cleansing Quality of the Colon
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05871801
Cleansing Quality of the Colon
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04702646
Cleansing Quality of the Colon
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, S/C de Tenerife, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03247452
Cleansing Quality of the Colon
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
View Trial Details