Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01836731

Impact Evaluation of Community-Based Health Programs in Rwanda

Community Health Clubs to improve local sanitation, hygiene and health conditions have been implemented in several countries in Africa and Asia with some success. The Ministry of Health in Rwanda has committed to rolling out a program designed along similar lines, the Community Based Environmental Health Promotion Program (CBEHPP), in all 15000 villages across Rwanda. The main objective of the program is to achieve 'zero open defecation' in all villages of Rwanda, at least 80% hygienic latrine coverage and improvements in a range of health behaviors such as the use of mosquito nets, hand-washing with soap and the use of household water treatment.

To evaluate the impact of the program on health, other socio-economic outcomes and community functioning, a single district has been chosen where 150 communities will be randomized to receive the intervention immediately or 18 months later. The evaluation is led by US based Innovation for Poverty Action (IPA) through researchers based at the National University of Rwanda, Georgetown University, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and New York University. The research team will work in close collaboration with the implementing team, which consists of the Ministry of Health, Rwanda and Africa AHEAD.

The study will span three years, beginning in May 2013, and ending in late 2015.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 day–5 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IPA Rwanda District Office, Kamembe, Rusizi District, Rwanda

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Preventable diseases such as respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases and malaria account for a large share of mortality in low income economies. For example, diarrheal diseases kill nearly 2.5 million people worldwide and account for a considerable share of under five mortality in low income countries. Broad-based economic development that includes improvements in infrastructure and service delivery can address the challenges associated with the infectious disease burden. But for many countries, these improvements are far in the future and/or very costly. Behavior change of individuals can also address these challenges and more importantly can be done now and relatively cheaply. Understanding how to produce this behavior change in needy contexts is crucial to the short and medium term response to the high costs imposed by these diseases. This protocol outlines an evaluation of an intervention aimed at producing sustainable behavior change around health, hygiene and sanitation. The evaluation consists of two parts: firstly to evaluate the health and socio-economic effects of a well-designed and supported community health club intervention. Secondly to examine whether the intervention can deliver health and other benefits utilizing the resource base available in this context. The answer to this latter question informs the scalability of the intervention. The overall objective of the study is to evaluate whether and how community hygiene/health clubs are an effective and sustainable response to addressing broad health, sanitation and hygiene needs in low-income countries.

A particular challenge associated with health interventions, is the extent to which free-rider problems mediate the adoption of improved behaviors. The community health club approach with regular meetings, is well placed to address these collective action challenges. Community health clubs provide a vehicle to inform and incentivize households to change their behavior in relation to a range of health outcomes. The information component arises from the six month long weekly courses covering a wide range of health, hygiene and sanitary subjects and facilitated by a community health worker. The incentives for sustainable behavior change follow from the social sanctions and rewards that club members can impose/bestow on members accordingly. As with other behavior change programs that have incorporated information components that emphasize the benefits of better health behavior, the evidence base for what works in this domain remains thin. The community health club approach is appealing largely because it mobilizes local resources and is plausibly cheaper and more sustainable than other top-down interventions.

To evaluate the impact of the program on health, other socio-economic conditions and community functioning, a single district has been chosen where communities will be randomly assigned to receive the intervention immediately or 18 months later. The evaluation is led by US-based Innovation for Poverty Action (IPA) through researchers based at the National University of Rwanda, Georgetown University, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and New York University. The research team will work in close collaboration with the implementing team, which consists of the Ministry of Health, Rwanda and Africa AHEAD.

The evaluation will measure impact heterogeneity with respect to key inputs that predict success of CHCs, including training and competence of CHWs, the quality of training materials, and community functioning. The evaluation will also document in detail the cost structure of the low- and high-resource versions of CHCs in order to inform the MOH about the most effective strategies for successful scale up of CHCs nationwide. More broadly, other governments, donor organizations and foundations will benefit from rigorous evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using health clubs to address health and sanitation challenges.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

-All households with children under 5 years in the study communities are eligible for socio-economic and health outcome evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

-All households are eligible to participate in the intervention. However, for the purposes of the study, households with no children under the age of 5 will not be selected for data collection purposes.

Treatment and study plan

Classic Intervention

Behavioral

The standard "classic" approach will implement a total of 20 community health club sessions delivered through weekly education programs in the target communities as per the training manual. Community health workers (CHW) will receive careful training in the delivery of the CBEHPP instruction. High quality instructional materials (in color) will be used. Club members will each receive a membership card to be used to track attendance and compliance. Finally model home competitions and a graduation ceremony will be held. Monitoring of the clubs will be conducted by community health workers using mobile phones.

Minimum Intervention

Behavioral

The "lite" trial arm will only implement 8 sessions covering all the WASH topics. It will be facilitated by CHWs receiving minimal training and using black/white photocopies of instructional materials. Members will not be issued with membership cards and will not have a graduation ceremony or home garden competitions. Minimal monitoring of this arm will be carried out by environmental health officers.

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Diarrhea

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    The main outcome of the health impact evaluation trial will be 14 day recall self-reported diarrhoea in children under 5 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of CBEHPP on height-for-age in children under-5 years

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    Height-for-age data will be collected from all children under 5 years old. Changes in Z-scores for each of these measures between baseline and endline will be compared across the two study arms and the control group.

  2. Impact of CBEHPP on weight-for-age in children under-5 years

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    weight-for-age data will be collected from all children under 5 years old. Changes in Z-scores for each of these measures between baseline and endline will be compared across the two study arms and the control group.

  3. Impact of CBEHPP on drinking water quality

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    Water quality data will be collected at baseline and endline, and at an intermediate visit following implementation of the program. Water quality will be determined testing of drinking water; study households will provide a sample of drinking water for contamination tests.

  4. Impact of CBEHPP on incidence of malaria

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    Self-reported incidence of malaria, will be collected from households.

  5. Impact of CBEHPP on individual contribution to public goods game

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    A public goods game is played with a subset of community members. The researchers examine the impact of the treatment on the level of contributions.

  6. Impact of CBEHPP on administratively verified cases of diarrhea

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    Total counts of child diarrhea cases recorded in catchment area clinics and community health worker records

  7. Impact of CBEHPP on administratively verified cases of pneumonia and severe pneunomia

    Time frame: 2.5 years

    Total counts of child pneumonia cases recorded in catchment area clinics and community health worker records

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Georgetown University

Other

Collaborators

  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Emory University
  • Innovations for Poverty Action
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • National University, Rwanda
  • New York University

Registry information

Official study title

Health Impact Evaluation of the "Community-Based Environmental Health Promotion Programme" in Rwanda

Acronym: CBEHPP

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Apr 22, 2013
Registry last updated
Jul 14, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.