Rutgers School of Health Professions
Newark, New Jersey, 07107, United States
NCT Number: NCT05160025
This study has three objectives about persons with Parkinson's Disease during bicycling:
1. Determine the effect of visual feedback and competition during virtual bicycling on neuromuscular and cardiovascular intensity 2. Determine the effect of visual-feedback and competition during virtual bicycling on the user experience of motivation, enjoyment & perception of exercise intensity 3. Determine if attention differs during visual feedback compared to competition virtual bicycling
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Newark, New Jersey, 07107, United States
Participants will attend one sessions lasting about 2-3 hours. They will complete movement assessments and questionnaires about physical activity. They will then exercise exercise in three different virtual reality augmented bicycling conditions while wearing a head mounted display (goggles). Each of the three conditions will last approximately 8 minutes and will be followed by questionnaires about the participant's experience.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This is a single arm study in which all participants will execute the same three bicycling tasks over one session. Exercise intensity and enjoyment are measured while participants bicycle in a virtual reality environment (wearing virtual reality goggles) in three different conditions lasting approximately 8 minutes each.
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute feedback bout
Bicycling cadence collected continuously (1 value per second, 1 Hz)
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute self-competition bout
Bicycling cadence collected continuously (1 value per second, 1 Hz)
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute other-competition bout
Bicycling cadence collected continuously (1 value per second, 1 Hz)
Time frame: Session 1 - Immediately after completing the 8-minute feedback bout
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory - enjoyment, competence, effort, and value subscales (16 questions total). Scores in each subscale are averaged, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 7. Higher scores indicate higher motivation.
Time frame: Session 1 - Immediately after completing the 8-minute self-competition bout
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory - enjoyment, competence, effort, and value subscales (16 questions total). Scores in each subscale are averaged, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 7. Higher scores indicate higher motivation.
Time frame: Session 1 - Immediately after completing the 8-minute other-competition bout
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory - enjoyment, competence, effort, and value subscales (16 questions total). Scores in each subscale are averaged, with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 7. Higher scores indicate higher motivation.
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute feedback bout
Heart rate collected continuously (1 value per second, 1 Hz)
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute self-competition bout
Heart rate collected continuously (1 value per second, 1 Hz)
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute other-competition bout
Heart rate collected continuously (1 value per second, 1 Hz)
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute feedback bout
3D gaze positions are measured continuously (40 values per second, 40 Hz) and valid gaze datapoints are extracted. The percentage of total valid gaze datapoints that are directed to the task are calculated as a metric of visual attention. A higher percentage reflects higher task focus, meaning that the higher percentage the higher degree of focus on the task. The reported value is measured as a percentage (%).
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute self-competition bout
3D gaze positions are measured continuously (40 values per second, 40 Hz) and valid gaze datapoints are extracted. The percentage of total valid gaze datapoints that are directed to the task are calculated as a metric of visual attention. A higher percentage reflects higher task focus, meaning that the higher percentage the higher degree of focus on the task. The reported value is measured as a percentage (%).
Time frame: Session 1 - During the 8-minute other-competition bout
3D gaze positions are measured continuously (40 values per second, 40 Hz) and valid gaze datapoints are extracted. The percentage of total valid gaze datapoints that are directed to the task are calculated as a metric of visual attention. A higher percentage reflects higher task focus, meaning that the higher percentage the higher degree of focus on the task. The reported value is measured as a percentage (%).
Time frame: Session 1 - Immediately at the start (0-minute mark) of the 8-minute feedback bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - At the midpoint (4-minute mark) of the 8-minute feedback bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - At the endpoint (8-minute mark) of the 8-minute feedback bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - Immediately at the start (0-minute mark) of the 8-minute self-competition bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - At the midpoint (4-minute mark) of the 8-minute self-competition bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - At the end (8-minute mark) of the 8-minute self-competition bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - Immediately at the start (0-minute mark) of the 8-minute other-competition bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - At the midpoint (4-minute mark) of the 8-minute other-competition bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Session 1 - At the end (8-minute mark) of the 8-minute other-competition bout
Borg scale measures a self-report of effort collected at multiple time points to compare the 3 exercise bouts. The score ranges from 6-20 with higher scores representing higher perceived exertion.
Time frame: Measured once before exercise bouts begin (after clinical assessments) (Repeat of Baseline Outcome Measure)
Measured once using the Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory consisting of 12 items from 4 subscales (hyper competitive, self-developmental, anxious, lack of interest) For each subscale, mean scores range from 1-6 with higher scores representing higher levels of that subscale metric.
Time frame: Session 1 - once at the end of the session. Collected upon study completion, immediately after finishing the final bicycling condition
Once, after completing all 3 bicycling conditions, participants will be asked in which of the 3 bicycling conditions they felt they worked the hardest. They will rank the 3 conditions with a score from 1-3, with a 1 indicating the condition in which they felt they worked the hardest and a 3 indicating the condition in which they felt they worked the least hard.
Time frame: Session 1 - once at the end of the session. Collected upon study completion, immediately after finishing the final bicycling condition
Once, after completing all 3 bicycling conditions, participants will be asked which of the 3 bicycling conditions they liked the best. They will rank the 3 conditions with a score from 1-3, with a 1 indicating the condition they liked the best and a 3 indicating the condition they liked the least.
Time frame: Session 1 - once at the end of the session. Collected upon study completion, immediately after finishing the final bicycling condition
Once, after completing all 3 bicycling conditions, participants will be asked about their exercise experience. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of recordings were not conducted. However, sample quotes representing constructs of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory will be included in future publications.
Time frame: Collected once at start of the session (Repeat of Baseline Outcome Measure)
Description of Motor Performance Scored from 0-108 a lower score is better outcome
Time frame: Collected once at start of the session (Repeat of Baseline Outcome Measure)
Exercise Inventory Questionnaire to measure levels of physical activity. Scores range from 0-793, and higher scores represent higher levels of physical activity over the past 7 days.
Time frame: Collected once during screening (Repeat of Baseline Outcome Measure)
15 item inventory to rate depression (scored from 0-15 with a lower score being better)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Other
Enhancing Exercise Intensity, Motivation and Enjoyment for Persons With PD (VCycle-Competition)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05778617
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05897957
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Orange, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01662414
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT07187843
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Disease
Reggio Emilia, Italy
View Trial Details