Clinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Cardiology
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
NCT Number: NCT02419833
In patients with acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation on ECG (non-STEMI), previous studies have indicated that routine invasive treatment confers more benefit as compared to selective invasive approach. The benefits of routine invasive coronary intervention have been the most evident in patients with higher baseline risk profile. However, the question of optimal timing of routine invasive intervention remains unsolved.
Immediate invasive intervention early after admission for non-STEMI may limit myocardial necrosis by securing the patency of the culprit coronary artery. Nevertheless, several previous studies reported higher levels of biomarkers of myocardial injury in patients undergoing early PCI. The question of earlier versus delayed procedure in non-STEMI patients may thus amount to whether the risk of intervening on an unstable plaque is greater than the risk of new ischemic events while waiting for the invasive procedure.
The purpose of the present study is to compare effects of immediate coronary intervention, within 2 hours of admission, versus delayed intervention, within 2-72 hours after admission, in patients witn non-STEMI.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Invasive coronary angiography followed by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery as soon as possible and/or within 2 hours of admission
Invasive coronary angiography followed by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during the hospitalization and/or within 2-72 hours of admission
Implantation of coronary stents
Time frame: within 30 days of randomization
Time frame: within 30 days of randomization
Time frame: within 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Time frame: within 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Time frame: within 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Time frame: within 30 days of randomization
Time frame: within 30 days, 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization
Time frame: at 30-day follow-up, the duration of hospital stay is assessed
Clinical Centre of Serbia
Other
Randomized Study of ImmeDiate Versus DeLayEd Invasive Intervention in Patients With Non ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Acronym: RIDDLE-NSTEMI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06065514
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Unstable
Nicosia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT05844566
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06702436
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06404515
ASCVD, Acute Coronary Syndrome
New York, United States
View Trial Details