Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00156026

Immediate Treatment vs Colposcopic Follow-up for Biopsy-Proven CIN 1

This study looks at immediate treatment of a cervix with CIN 1 versus regular six-month follow-up with colposcopy and treatment if CIN 1 progresses.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In women who present with biopsy-proven CIN 1, to compare the management approach of regular colposcopic follow-up and only treating progressive disease using the LEEP, with an approach of immediate treatment using LEEP. The primary outcome is progression to more advanced disease (i.e., CIN 2, CIN 3 or cancer).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible patients will:
  • have documented CIN 1 by histologic assessment as the highest grade lesion present,
  • have the lesion confined to the cervix and completely visualized,
  • be 16 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

  • any one of the following will be an excluding characteristic:
  • index Pap smear showing CIN 2, CIN 3 or cancer;
  • index Pap smear shows atypical glandular cells of unknown significance, glandular dysplasia, or malignancy requiring immediate investigation;
  • patients with previously identified CIN 1 by biopsy who are already in a colposcopic surveillance program;
  • unsatisfactory colposcopic exam defined as inability to see the extent of the lesion in the endocervical canal or absence of a lesion on the ectocervix but endocervical curettage shows CIN 1;
  • pregnancy;
  • prior therapy for dysplasia including medical (5FU), surgical (Laser, LEEP) or cryotherapy;
  • prior gynecologic cancer;
  • prior pelvic radiation therapy;
  • inability to attend outpatient follow-up visits because of geographic inaccessibility;
  • other malignancies except non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • immunosuppression due to diseases such as AIDS, organ transplantation, or on immunosuppressive medications such as prednisone, imuran or chemotherapy for diseases like systemic lupus;
  • cognitively impaired or otherwise unable to obtain written informed consent;
  • extension of the CIN 1 lesion to vagina or a separate vaginal lesion showing dysplasia;
  • colposcopically visible condyloma outside of the transformation zone;
  • known allergy to local analgesics;
  • clinically evident vaginitis must be treated and resolved prior to entry on the trial;
  • inability to read and respond in English/French;
  • failure to provide informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP)

Procedure
  • loop electrosurgical excision procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. progression to more advanced disease

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. persistent CIN 1 after 18 months

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. bleeding.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. predict disease persistence or progression

    Time frame: 18 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Immediate Treatment vs. Colposcopic Follow-up for Biopsy-Proven CIN 1

Important dates

Study start
2000
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Sep 12, 2005
Registry last updated
Jan 29, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.