P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute
Moscow, Russia
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Andrey Ryabov, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Anton Kollontai
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Ilya Kolobaev, PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07441785
Proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers comprise up to 40% of gastric malignancies. For localized disease, proximal gastrectomy is the main radical procedure, but reconstruction of GI tract often leads to significant functional issues.
Rising use of proximal resections and broader indications have increased attention to postoperative quality of life (QoL). Common reconstructions include direct esophagogastrostomy (various types), double-tract reconstruction, jejunal interposition, and newer anti-reflux anastomoses (e.g., double-flap, overlap, tunnel techniques).
Each method has unique pros and cons regarding reflux esophagitis, food passage, dumping syndrome, nutritional changes, and long-term QoL.
No consensus exists on the optimal technique, leading to variable practices and outcomes. Most research focuses on oncologic radicality and survival, while functional results and QoL remain understudied.
Systematic evaluation of functional outcomes across reconstruction types after proximal subtotal gastrectomy is needed in Russian Federation to improve QoL, advance research, and standardize treatment of proximal gastric and EGJ cancers.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Moscow, Russia
Location status: Recruiting
Andrey Ryabov, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Anton Kollontai
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Ilya Kolobaev, PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer account for up to 40% of all gastric malignancies. For localized disease, proximal gastrectomy remains the primary radical surgical procedure. However, roconstruction of gastrointestinal continuity after this procedure is associated with significant functional disturbances.
The increasing frequency of proximal resections and expanding indications have heightened focus on postoperative quality of life (QoL). Currently used reconstruction techniques include direct esophagogastrostomy (in various modifications), double-tract reconstruction, jejunal interposition, and emerging anti-reflux esophagogastric anastomoses (e.g., double-flap technique, single-overlap, tunnel reconstruction, etc).
Each method carries distinct advantages and disadvantages concerning reflux esophagitis, food passage, dumping syndrome, nutritional status alterations, and long-term QoL.
Despite this variety, no universal consensus exists regarding the optimal reconstruction technique, resulting in heterogeneous surgical practices and variable functional outcomes. Most studies prioritize oncologic radicality and overall survival, whereas functional results and QoL remain under-investigated.
To enhance patient QoL, advance research, and standardize treatment of proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers in the Russian Federation, there is a clear need for systematic evaluation of functional outcomes across different reconstruction types following proximal subtotal gastrectomy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Resection of the upper third to one-half of the stomach and the distal portion of the esophagus with different types of digestive system reconstruction
Time frame: within 90 days after operation
the types of complication is classified into as follows: esophageal anastomotic leak requiring surgical treatment, esophageal anastomotic leak not requiring surgical treatment, gastric stump necrosis, postoperative bleeding requiring surgical treatment, postoperative bleeding not requiring surgical treatment, postoperative ileum, postoperative pancreatic fistula type B, postoperative pancreatic fistula type C, duodenal stump leak / duodenal stump insufficiency, impaired evacuation from the gastric stump (more than 10 days after surgery), postoperative intestinal perforation or necrosis, persistent air leak through the pleural drain, wound dehiscence (evisceration, hernia), incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia, chylothorax or other types of lymph leakage, infectious complications of the postoperative wound, other complications requiring repeat intervention or another invasive procedure, other.
Time frame: 1 year after operation
Overall survival within 1 year after operation
Time frame: 1 year after operation
Frequency of local recurrence within 1 year after operation
Time frame: 1 year after operation
Frequency of tumor progression within 1 year after operation
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Incidence of development and the severity (degree of expression) of reflux esophagitis according to the Los Angeles classification in the postoperative period
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Incidence of development of esophageal anastomotic stricture in the postoperative period.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Incidence and severity of dumping syndrome, along with quality of life assessment in the postoperative period according to the KOQUSS-40 questionnaire at 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Pressure of the esophageal anastomosis in the postoperative period according to esophageal manometry
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
The level of body weight reduction in the postoperative period
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
The level of hemoglobin in 6 and 12 months after surgery
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
The rate of passage of food through the esophagus and the stump of the stomach, as well as evacuation from the stump of the stomach into the small intestine based on scintigraphy of the stomach and esophagus after 12 months after surgery
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute
Other Gov
Acronym: PROXISTAT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07702292
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07689851
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07224750
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07217704
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Cerritos, California, United States
View Trial Details