IMI/REL FDC
Drug500 mg Imipenem, 500 mg Cilastatin and 250 mg Relebactam powder FDC provided in a single vial
Other names: MK-7655A
NCT Number: NCT03583333
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a FDC of imipenem/cilastatin (IMI) and relebactam (REL) [IMI/REL, MK-7655A] compared to piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) in the treatment of adults diagnosed with Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP) or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP). The primary hypothesis is that IMI/REL is non-inferior to PIP/TAZ as measured by the incidence rate of all-cause mortality through Day 28 post-randomization.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Santa Casa de Misericordia de Belo Horizonte ( Site 0300), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
500 mg Imipenem, 500 mg Cilastatin and 250 mg Relebactam powder FDC provided in a single vial
Other names: MK-7655A
4000 mg Piperacillin and 500 mg Tazobactam powder FDC provided in a single vial
Open-label 600 mg Linezolid
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 days
For each participant, survival status was assessed at Day 28 post-randomization and recorded on the electronic Case Report Form. The percentage of participants with all-cause mortality through Day 28 in the MITT population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 27 days
Clinical response was defined as "Sustained cure" (All pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved or returned to preinfection status with no evidence of resurgence AND no additional antibiotic therapy was required for the index infection) or "Cure" (All pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved or returned to preinfection status AND no additional antibiotic therapy was required for the index infection). The percentage of participants achieving a favorable clinical response at EFU visit in the MITT population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 27 days
Clinical response was defined as "Sustained cure" (All pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved or returned to preinfection status with no evidence of resurgence) AND no additional antibiotic therapy was required for the index infection or "Cure" (All pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional antibiotic therapy was required for the index infection. The percentage of participants achieving a favorable clinical response at EFU visit in the CE population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 days
Clinical response was defined as "Improved" (The majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved or returned to "pre-infection status" AND no additional antibiotic therapy was required) or "Cure" (All pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved or returned to preinfection status AND no additional antibiotic therapy was required for the index infection). The percentage of participants achieving a favorable clinical response at EOT visit in the MITT population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 days
Clinical response was defined as "Improved" (The majority of pre-therapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have improved or resolved or returned to "pre-infection status" AND no additional antibiotic therapy is required) or "Cure" (All pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection have resolved or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional antibiotic therapy is required for the index infection. The percentage of participants achieving a favorable clinical response at End of Treatment (EOT) visit in the CE population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 days
Favorable overall microbiological response rates were defined as "eradication" (A lower respiratory tract culture taken at the EOT visit showed eradication of the pathogen found at study entry) OR "presumed eradication" (No specimen taken because participant was deemed clinically cured or improved) of the baseline pathogen. The percentage of participants achieving a favorable microbiological response at EOT visit in the mMITT population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 27 days
A favorable by-pathogen microbiological response at EFU visit required "eradication" (A lower respiratory tract culture taken at the EFU visit showed eradication of the pathogen found at study entry) or "presumed eradication" (No specimen taken because participant was deemed clinically cured or improved) of the baseline pathogen. The percentage of participants achieving a favorable microbiological response at EFU visit in the ME population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 days
Favorable overall microbiological response rates was defined as "eradication" (A lower respiratory tract culture taken at the EOT visit showed eradication of the pathogen found at study entry) OR "presumed eradication" (No specimen taken because participant was deemed clinically cured or improved) of the baseline pathogen. The percentage of participants achieving a favorable microbiological response at End of Treatment (EOT) visit in the ME population is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 98 days
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants experiencing an AE was reported for each arm.
Time frame: Up to approximately 14 days
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants that discontinued study therapy due to an AE was reported for each arm.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Multi-national Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05905055
Acute Pyelonephritis, Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
Changsha, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03894046
Acinetobacter Baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex, Bacteremia
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06087536
Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Ashdod, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT04107363
Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia
View Trial Details