Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät Technische Universität Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, 01307, Germany
NCT Number: NCT05842421
Prospective, unicentric study that examines if imaging devices like total body photography, dermoscopy, optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy as an addition to clinical examination lead to a benefit for patients in the diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer and their precursors
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dresden, Saxony, 01307, Germany
250 patients with lesions that are suspicious for non-melanoma skin cancer that had not yet had a biopsy, are randomized in 2 groups. The intervention group is examined with total body photography, dermoscopy, optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy; the control group is examined with dermoscopy only. The aim of the study is to investigate whether these methods improve the early detection of non-melanoma skin cancer and their precursors. Examined are not only the differences in management of the lesions (excision, biopsy, local treatment or no treatment) and the diagnostic accuracy of the devices.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
each lesion is in addition to examination with dermoscopy examined with optical coherence tomography, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy, each patient is photographed with 3D total body photography
Time frame: up to 24 months
Is management of non-melanoma skin cancer optimized after using non-invasive imaging devices like optical coherence tomography, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in comparison to examination with dermoscopy alone (number of primary excisions, number of biopsies, number of secondary inpatient stays due to positive biopsies, number of local treatments and lesions in which no treatment is necessary)
Time frame: up to 24 months
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and optical coherence tomography and invivo reflectance confocal microscopy (is diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography better or confocal microscopy better than in dermoscopy alone?
Time frame: up to 24 months
Does the combination of the results of optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in each lesion lead to an even better diagnostic accuracy than each device alone?
Time frame: up to 24 months
Examination of diagnostic accuracy of 3D total body photography regarding non-melanoma skin cancer in comparison to examination with dermoscopy
Technische Universität Dresden
Other
Imaging Methods Like Dermoscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography, in Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and 3D Total Body Photography for the Diagnosis of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer and Its Precursors
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07434323
Melanoma, Neoplasms
Roma, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT02636569
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04091022
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05257486
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
Campbell, California, United States
View Trial Details