Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02605161

Imaging Blood Brain Imaging Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the blood brain barrier in the striatum of patients that have other types of movement disorders compared to patients with Parkinson's Disease that are receiving similar treatment, to determine if a there is a disruption of the blood brain barrier in patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder of aging. Its cause is unknown. Current evidence supports a stress-diathesis model of pathogenesis whereby some yet-to-be identified environmental trigger conspires with a permissive genetic background to initiate the disease process. Based on neuropathological observations in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy where pathological protein aggregates form in close association with damaged blood vessels, investigators have hypothesized that the environmental trigger resides in the bloodstream. As a corollary of this hypothesis, investigators propose that the PD pathological process begins in the brain of affected individuals only after disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB), thereby allowing access of the inciting agent to nigrostriatal axon terminals in the neostriatum. This forms the foundation for the investigators' hypothesis that the BBB in the neostriatum of PD patients is disrupted. Indeed, in a post-mortem study, investigators demonstrated histopathological evidence for significant striatal BBB disruption in sections of striatum from PD subjects relative to age-matched controls. Critics of this study indicate that post-mortem effects may result in artefactual disruption of the BBB, calling into question the validity and relevance of this potentially important finding to PD pathogenesis and progression. Therefore, investigators are performing this imaging study of live PD patients as a follow-up of their convincing post-mortem study to definitively establish whether BBB dysfunction is a feature of PD.

The neostriatal BBB is dysfunctional in PD patients relative to controls and this can be demonstrated by significantly increased parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

The results of these studies could have important implications for the understanding of PD pathogenesis. There is emerging evidence that the key pathogenetic event in PD pathogenesis, aggregation of alpha-synuclein, begins within the axon terminals of neurons. The neurons most severely affected in PD reside in the substantia nigra and project to the neostriatum. Demonstrating disruption of the BBB in the PD striatum would render nigrostriatal axon terminals susceptible to a blood-borne disease trigger and allow researchers to generate hypotheses regarding the identity of this trigger. Immune/inflammatory candidates are particularly attractive in this regard. The results this study may also have therapeutic implications. For example, if alpha-synuclein disaggregating agents achieve therapeutic utility in the coming years, our studies may indicate that such agents may be capable of accessing nigrostriatal axon terminals without requiring pharmaceutical or mechanical disruption of the BBB.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Disease burden is dominated by motor symptoms such as rigidity, bradykinesia, akinesia, and tremor;
  • Medications have been optimized by a movement disorder neurologist;
  • Adequate social support to assist with preoperative recovery and problems during subsequent programming;
  • No major mood disorder and any mood disorders are medically optimized;
  • No major cognitive impairment;
  • No underlying medical conditions that would preclude surgery;
  • Adequate response to levodopa, as assessed by UPDRS-3 on and off levodopa. All participants has at least a 30% improvement;
  • eGRF>30

Exclusion criteria

  • Disease burden is not dominated by motor symptoms such as rigidity, bradykinesia, akinesia, and tremor;
  • Medications have not bee optimized by a movement disorder neurologist;
  • There is not adequate social support to assist with pre-operative recovery or problems during subsequent programming;
  • Presence of major mood disorders or any mood disorders not medically optimized;
  • Presence of major cognitive impairment;
  • Presence of underlying medical conditions that would preclude surgery;
  • Inadequate response to levodopa;
  • eGFR<30

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Degree of contrast enhancement

    Time frame: one year

    Pre-contrast images will be used as mask images and will be digitally substracted from post-contrast images to obtain the "difference" images. From the "difference images", two neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical status of the patient will assess the degree enhancement in the striatum (none,mild, moderate, marked).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Permeability of blood brain barrier in the striatum

    Time frame: one year

    Quantitative assessment of the permeability of the blood brain barrier in the striatum will be assessed using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Specifically, the volume transfer constant (Ktrans) will be measured from the striatum in the control and patient groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Nov 16, 2015
Registry last updated
Dec 31, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.