Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05976945

Imagery Rescripting as Treatment for Depression

The goal of this multiple baseline case series study is to test Imagery Rescripting in depression. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

* does Imagery Rescripting lead to a reduction of depression and of believability of negative beliefs held by the participants? * does Imagery Rescripting also leads to reductions in worrying and brooding? * Participants will wait for 6-10 weeks (to assess time effects without treatment), followed by 5 weekly preparation sessions, 8-12 weekly Imagery Rescripting sessions, and 5 weeks post-treatment. * Participants will rate the believability of 3-5 core dysfunctional beliefs related to their depression as well as 2 items assessing depression severity on a weekly basis. In addition, they will fill out more extensive questionnaires on depression, worry and brooding before each phase, as well as at 5 weeks post-treatment, and 6 and 12 months follow-up.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Academic Center for Trauma and Personality ACTP

Amsterdam, 1062 XD, Netherlands

About this study

In a multiple baseline case series study the effectiveness of Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) as a treatment for depression will be tested. 10 patients with a major depressive disorder (MDD) or a persistent depressive disorder (PDD) will be randomized to different waitlist lengths (6-10 weeks), after which they will enter a 5-session preparation phase (5 weeks), followed by 12 weekly sessions of ImRs. After this treatment follow-up assessments take place at 5 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes are (1) depression severity weekly assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) and (2) idiosyncratic core beliefs assessed with visual analogue scales. The hypothesis is that primary outcomes reduce more during treatment than during wait or preparation and remain stable or further improve post-treatment. Similarly, for secondary outcomes (depression severity assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II); brooding (dysfunctional type of rumination) assessed with the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) Brooding subscale; and worrying assessed with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)) we expect the largest improvement to take place from pre- to post treatment, with little change taking place during baseline and preparation, and during/after post-treatment.

Results will be analyzed by multilevel analysis, pooling the effects of the individual cases. Lastly, participants will be interviewed 5 weeks post treatment about their experiences with treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary diagnosis of MDD as assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) (SCID-5)
  • Total score of 20* or above on the BDI-II (cut-off score for moderate depression) (Beck et al., 1996). (*Based on previous research by Brewin et al. (2009) & Yuen-tin (2017) demonstrating averages of BDI-II: 34-35, in their population.)
  • Age 18-65
  • Dutch or English as a first language (or estimated as sufficient to receive treatment in either of these languages without interpreter)
  • Willingness to participate in the study (signed informed consent)

Exclusion criteria

  • DSM-5 Bipolar disorder, type 1 (current or past); if there has been no manic episode the last year patients will be included
  • Psychotic disorders (though psychotic features alongside depression will be allowed)
  • Organic brain disease
  • Intelligence Quotient (IQ) < 80
  • High risk of self-harm or suicide
  • Current substance abuse severe level
  • Start of new medication within 2 months before beginning the study (medication used for longer periods can be continued; patients are requested to keep medication stable during the course of the study)
  • Having received ImRs (either as a stand-alone or embedded in a greater treatment such as cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) or schema therapy) within the last year
  • No other evidence-based treatment of MDD is allowed during the study.
  • Not able to plan enough time for weekly therapy sessions (45-60 minutes); weekly measurements (estimate of 5 minutes) and other measurements (estimate of 20 minutes); and the qualitative post-treatment interview (estimate of 60 minutes) during the study period.

Treatment and study plan

Imagery Rescripting

Behavioral

In Imagery Rescripting patients imagine a different sequence of events matching their needs better than what actually happened in traumatic and other adverse (childhood) experiences.

Primary outcomes

  1. Depression severity

    Time frame: 28-32 weeks plus 6 and 12 months follow-ups

    Depression severity assessed with the first 2 items of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 6. A higher score means worse outcome.

  2. Core beliefs strength

    Time frame: 28-32 weeks plus 6 and 12 months follow-ups

    Idiosyncratic core beliefs related to the depression are formulated together with the participant and weekly rated on Visual Analogue Scales.The mean of the scores is taken, range 0-100. A higher score means a worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Beck Depression Inventory-II

    Time frame: before baseline, before preparatory sessions, before ImRs treatment, 5 weeks after ImRs treatment, 6 and 12 months follow-ups

    The Beck Depression Inventory-II assesses severity of depression. The minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 63. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

  2. Brooding intensity

    Time frame: before baseline, before preparatory sessions, before ImRs treatment, 5 weeks after ImRs treatment, 6 and 12 months follow-ups

    The Brooding subscale of the Ruminative Response Scale assesses intensity of problematic brooding. The minimum score is 5, the maximum is 20. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

  3. Worry intensity

    Time frame: before baseline, before preparatory sessions, before ImRs treatment, 5 weeks after ImRs treatment, 6 and 12 months follow-ups

    The Penn State Worry Questionnaire assesses intensity of problematic worrying. The minimum score is 16, the maximum 80. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

Other outcomes

  1. patients' experiences

    Time frame: 5 weeks after end of treatment

    with a semi-structured interview, participants will be interviewed 5 weeks after treatment. A qualitative analysis will be used.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Amsterdam

Other

Collaborators

  • Academic Center for Trauma and Personality

Registry information

Official study title

Imagery Rescripting as a Stand-alone Treatment for Depression: a Pilot Study.

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Aug 4, 2023
Registry last updated
May 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.