Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05428891

Image-guided Pleural Biopsy or Medical Thoracosocopy in Diagnosis of Pleural Disease

Pleural diseases can occur due to numerous pathological conditions. The increasing prevalence of etiologic causes and aging population worldwide will make pleural diseases a growing problem in the coming years. As a result of this increase, the need for diagnostic investigations is also increasing. In recent years, the use of image-guided needle biopsies under ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) and the increasing use of medical thoracoscopy (MT) have significantly increased the accuracy of diagnosis of pleural disease. There is not yet a generally accepted algorithm for invasive diagnosis of pleural disease, widely used in clinics, that determines which method should be used in which patient. It would be necessary and valuable to develop an algorithm based on imaging findings in particular to improve the diagnostic accuracy, safety, and cost of the procedure. The investigators aimed to test the algorithm in an interventional study to increase the level of evidence in this study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty Department of Chest Diseases

Eskişehir, Tepebaşı, 260140, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

No consensus exists regarding which biopsy methods are appropriate for specific procedures. In this randomized prospective study, the investigators aimed to compare image guided - pleural biopsy using an Abrams' needle (IG-ANPB) with medical thoracoscopy (MT) according to the CT findings of the patients concerning both diagnostic yield and safety.

Between May 2017 and March 2022, 228 patients with exudative pleural effusion who the cytological analysis could not diagnose were included. All patients were separated into two groups regarding the CT findings: Only pleural effusion or pleural effusion with pleural thickening/lesion. In each group, the patients were randomized to either underwent IG-ANPB or underwent MT. The two groups were compared in terms of diagnostic sensitivity, accuracy, and complications.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Pleural effusion Malignant pleural diseases Pleurisy tuberculosis Benign pleural diseases

Exclusion criteria

Age less than 18 years, Parapneumonic effusion, Presence of other systemic diseases that could interfere radiological evaluation.

Treatment and study plan

Abrams' needle pleural biopsy (IG-ANPB) versus medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural diseases.

Procedure

We compare the diagnostic efficacy and safety of imaging-guided Abrams needle biopsy with medical thoracoscopy.

Other names: A diagnostic algorithm for pleural diseases.

Primary outcomes

  1. The efficacy of pleural biopsy methods for the diagnosis of pleural diseases.

    Time frame: 60 months

    To compare the diagnostic efficacy and safety of imaging-guided Abrams needle biopsy with medical thoracoscopy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eskisehir Osmangazi University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Image-guided Pleural Needle Biopsy or Medical Thoracoscopy: Which Method for Which Patient? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jun 23, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 11, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.