NCT Number: NCT04324619
This proposed randomized controlled trial will examine whether gamified micro-learning is a feasible and effective way to promote long-term learning about child abuse and its reporting. After completing the interactive online learning program, iLookOut for Child Abuse, early childhood professionals will receive brief (5-10 minute) gamified learning exercises to complete on their smart-phones. By measuring knowledge (and other outcomes) over time, the investigators will determine how much knowledge decays over various time periods, how well micro-learning can remediate that decay, and whether such a 2-phase intervention is feasible for helping early childhood professionals be better prepared to identify and report suspected child abuse.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Benjamin H Levi, MD PhD
CONTACT
Benjamin H Levi, MD PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nicole Verdiglione, BA
CONTACT
717-531-8521 ext. 283-765
The epidemic of child abuse in the U.S. (>670,000 confirmed annually) causes massive harm to children and the adults they become. Surprisingly, <1% of these substantiated cases of child abuse are identified and reported by early childhood professionals (ECPs) -though they take care of >10 million American children.
In the parent study, the online learning program, iLookOut for Child Abuse (iLookOut), has been shown to significantly improve ECPs' knowledge and attitudes about child abuse/reporting; and preliminary data from an NICHD-sponsored randomized controlled trial suggest that iLookOut also improves ECPs' actual reporting of suspected abuse -ie, a greater likelihood of reports being screened-in, and screened-in reports leading to findings of abuse and/or social services being recommended.
It is known that for gains in knowledge to be sustained, they must be reinforced …and reinforced again -because newly acquired knowledge decays over time unless it is put into use. To that end, the investigators have built and piloted a micro-learning platform that delivers gamified, interactive, micro-learning activities to 1) reinforce information taught in iLookOut's (3-hour) core learning program, 2) augment this learning with new material, and 3) provide opportunities to practice applying what has been learned. ECPs can complete micro-learning activities on their smartphones, and receive 3 additional hours of professional development credit (at no cost). Since deploying this platform, the majority of ECPs enrolling in the parent iLookOut study have engaged in >1 hour of micro-learning.
Because so many ECPs are willing to engage in iLookOut's micro-learning, and because spaced retrieval and spaced practice are known to improve learning, the investigators have reason to believe that this new intervention can help sustain ECPs' preparedness to appropriately identify and report suspected child abuse. What is not known is the rate of knowledge decay following iLookOut's core learning program; whether a multi-faceted implementation strategy (core + micro-learning) helps remediate decays in knowledge; and what is the best timing to introduce this reinforcement -immediately, or after a delay of some months.
iLookOut's micro-learning platform is fully integrated with the learning management system for iLookOut's core learning program, and a cognitive sequencing map helps ensure that micro-learning content is fully aligned with the core learning program. Upgrading the functionality of the current micro-learning activities will enable the investigators to capture the kind of granular, question-level data needed for rigorous research. Conducting a randomized controlled trial in Pennsylvania (where micro-learning has not yet been introduced) will allow the investigators to evaluate how well interactive, micro-learning activities improve learning, and more generally how a multi-faceted implementation strategy that utilizes mobile technology-based learning (ie, using smartphones) can better prepare ECPs to appropriately identify and report suspected child abuse.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 5 years
Evaluate whether a multi-faceted implementation strategy that includes learners completing an initial core training that is reinforced by using a micro-learning program (core learning program + micro-learning) is a way to educate ECPs about child abuse and its reporting. We will judge the iLookOut intervention program to have an acceptable completion rate if: >50% of ECPs who complete iLookOut's core learning program also complete the micro-learning program.
Time frame: 5 years
Evaluate whether a multi-faceted implementation strategy that includes learners completing an initial core training followed by using a micro-learning program is a feasible way to educate ECPs about child abuse and its reporting. We will judge the iLookOut intervention feasible if:
>75% of participants report endorsing the iLookOut micro-learning program, as measured by the a net promoter score that is >0. The net promoter scale consists of one question, How likely would you be to recommend this learning program to a fellow early childhood professional?, with responses measured on a -100 to +100.
Time frame: 5 years
The iLookOut knowledge measure includes 26 knowledge items. Each item has a correct and incorrect response that is scored for correctness. The knowledge score will be measured at 5 time-points: 1) prior to the core learning program; 2) immediately after the learning program; 3) immediately prior to micro-learning; 4) immediately after micro-learning; and 5) three months after completion of micro-learning. The average knowledge score will be compared at each time-point.
Time frame: 5 years
The iLookOut knowledge scores collected at each of 5 time points will be compared to determine the change in knowledge at each time-point. A reduction in knowledge score from a prior assessment of knowledge will be considered a decay in knowledge. An increase in knowledge score after such a decay will be considered remediation. Knowledge scores will evaluate the natural course of knowledge decay, the degree of remediation following completion of micro-learning activities, and then any subsequent knowledge decay. Knowledge will be measured at 5 time-points: 1) prior to the core learning program; 2) immediately after the learning program; 3) immediately prior to micro-learning; 4) immediately after micro-learning; and 5) three months after completion of micro-learning. The average knowledge scores at each time-point will be compared.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Benjamin H Levi, MD PhD
CONTACT
Nicole Verdiglione, MA
CONTACT
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06375551
Behavior, Child Abuse
Eugene, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06650267
Child Abuse, Substance Misuse
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05562557
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Child Abuse
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02225301
Behavior, Child Abuse
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details