Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02660346

IL-10 Stratifying Tool for Towards Antibiotic Selection for MRSaB

Patients with MRSaB have high therapeutic failure rates and mortality rates. Recent studies have shown that an elevated IL-10 level is an independent risk factor of mortality. It may also serve as biomarker for very early risk stratification. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes for patients with elevated IL-10 levels (≥8 pg/ml) when treated with standard antibiotic therapy (daptomycin or vancomycin) versus early aggressive therapy (daptomycin with ceftaroline) for the treatment of MRSaB.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Sharp Grossmont Hospital, La Mesa, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients with MRSaB have primary therapeutic failure rates of 40-50% and high mortality rate of 10-50% when treated with the recommended standard antimicrobial therapy. (Sharp) local data for MRSaB for 2014 shows an all-cause mortality rate of 29%. Recent studies have been published that utilize the predictive biomarker, IL-10, aiding the understanding for the wide variability in mortality. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical relevance of utilizing IL-10 levels to optimize MRSaB management and whether or not patient outcomes are enhanced.

Under current standard treatment strategies, vancomycin 15 mg/kg IVPB every 12 hrs following a 30 mg/kg IVPB loading dose is the first line of antibiotic therapy initiated with known or suspected MRSaB. Only when patients have showed an unsatisfactory clinical response such as prolonged bacteremia and/or continued clinical signs of uncontrolled infection are more potent/aggressive and more expensive antibiotic choices considered in most cases. Even the time for consideration of such a switch is a matter of controversy, with current MRSA treatment guidelines recommending a switch after 7-days of failure.

Several recent studies have shown that an elevated IL-10 level is an independent risk factor of mortality. In animal models, it has been shown that the bacterial cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus stimulates the production of IL-10. A small study by Rose et al. showed that this observation is consistent in humans. In another study, the authors concluded that elevated IL-10 at the time of presentation is a predictive value of mortality in patients with MRSaB4. In addition, the authors concluded that IL-10 may serve as a biomarker for very early risk stratification, with selection of standard therapy for low-risk patients and more potent, expensive, and cumbersome antibiotic therapies reserved for the high-risk patients. Furthermore, it is postulated that treating high risk patients with aggressive/intensified therapy earlier may improve economic and microbiological outcomes, such as a decreased length of treatment, decreased time in the Intensive Care Unit, decreased length of stay in the hospital, and decreased duration of bacteremia.

The aim in this study is to compare the outcomes for patients with elevated IL-10 levels (≥ 8 pg/mL) when treated with standard antibiotic therapy versus early aggressive therapy for the treatment of MRSaB. Aggressive therapy is defined in study to be daptomycin (6-8mg/kg/day) with ceftaroline (600 mg q8hr).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (≥ 18 years of age) men or women.
  • Diagnosis of MRSaB
  • Has not been treated with antibiotics for MRSaB within 7 days of admission
  • Has been on standard antibiotics for < 72hrs prior to randomization
  • In the opinion of the investigator, the subject must require and be a suitable candidate for IV antibiotic therapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Medical history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to vancomycin, or vancomycin derivatives, daptomycin or ceftaroline
  • Severe allergy to cephalosporins, i.e. Type 1 reaction, especially IgE mediated anaphylaxis
  • Comfort care patients
  • Death within 72hrs of the start of antibiotic therapy
  • Polymicrobial bacteremia: Staphylococcus aureus and another gram positive, gram negative or anaerobic pathogen
  • Burns covering ≥ 10% of body.
  • Pt currently enrolled in an investigational study

Treatment and study plan

daptomycin

Drug

Control Arm Treatment if used as monotherapy. Study Arm Treatment if used in combination with ceftaroline.

Other names: Cubicin

Vancomycin

Drug

Control Arm Treatment

Other names: Vancocin HCL

ceftaroline

Drug

Study Arm Treatment

Other names: Teflaro

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to bacteremia clearance

    Time frame: 1-4 weeks

    To determine whether or not early aggressive antibiotic therapy are correlated to shorter time to bacteremia clearance compared to standard therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of IL-10 levels between standard and aggressive therapy treatments

    Time frame: About 2 months from blood draw to the batch results

    To determine whether or not patients who have high IL-10 levels treated with aggressive antibiotic therapy have better outcomes compared with standard therapy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sharp HealthCare

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Open Label Study of Utilizing Interleukin 10 (IL-10) Levels as a Guide for Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jan 21, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 1, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.