c 001 Avicenne Service de réanimation médico chirurgicale
Bobigny, 93000, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06032884
Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous RRT (CRRT) provided as continuous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration are the main RRT modalities in ICU. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IHD and CRRT for AKI have not shown an indisputable benefit of one technique over the other. However, these studies were conducted more than 15 years ago. In addition, several recent RCTs on RRT initiation strategies have completely modified both knowledge and practice of RRT initiation.
The main objective is to evaluate whether IHD is not inferior to CRRT with regard to overall incidence of a composite outcome of death, persistent renal dysfunction and dialysis dependency at day 90 in critically ill patients with severe AKI (Major Kidney Event 90, MAKE 90). The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients who will meet one or more criteria for a major adverse kidney event 90 days after randomization (MAKE90). The MAKE will be the composite of death, renal replacement therapy dependence and/or an increase in serum creatinine above 25% of its basal value.
This is a non-inferiority multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Randomization will take place 1:1 to 2 groups: a group receiving IHD and a group receiving CRRT. Randomization will be stratified according to center, dose of vasopressor and cumulative fluid balance from ICU admission. Treatment will be initiated and monitored by the physician responsible for patient. Whatever the group, investigators will follow recommendations to achieve optimal metabolic control and hemodynamic stability. The investigators plan to include 1000 patients.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bobigny, 93000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous RRT (CRRT) provided as continuous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration are the main RRT modalities in ICU. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IHD and CRRT for AKI have not shown an indisputable benefit of one technique over the other. However, these studies were conducted more than 15 years ago. Major progresses were eventually made leading to much lower mortality rates in recent studies of RRT for AKI. In addition, an important pitfall of previous studies on RRT modalities is that the indications for initiating RRT were disputable in the light of present knowledge. Indeed, these studies included a noticeable proportion of patients who could have recovered without ever receiving RRT. Three recent RCTs on the timing of RRT for AKI have shown that, in the absence of immediate life-threatening complication, RRT initiation can be safely delayed, allowing up to 49% of severe AKI patients to escape RRT. Many such patients who did not actually require RRT were included in previous studies on modalities. This justifies a reevaluation of this issue by the performance of a new RCT that takes recent knowledge on RRT initiation into account.
The main objective is to evaluate whether IHD is not inferior to CRRT with regard to overall incidence of a composite outcome of death, persistent renal dysfunction and dialysis dependency at day 90 in critically ill patients with severe AKI. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients who will meet one or more criteria for a major adverse kidney event 90 days after randomization (MAKE90). The MAKE will be the composite of death, renal replacement therapy dependence and/or an increase in serum creatinine above 25% of its basal value.
The secondary objectives will address the effect of IHD versus CRRT on:
Another secondary objective will be to assess the ability of plasma and urinary AKI biomarkers collected at D0 an ICU discharge to predict renal function recovery.
The secondary endpoints will be:
Another secondary endpoint will be the association between the concentration of several plasma and urinary AKI biomarkers (KIM-1, CCL-14, PENKID, NGAL) collected at D0 and at ICU discharge and the MAKE-90.
This is a non-inferiority multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Randomization will take place 1:1 to 2 groups: a group receiving IHD and a group receiving CRRT. Randomization will be stratified according to center, dose of vasopressor and cumulative fluid balance from ICU admission. Treatment will be initiated and monitored by the physician responsible for patient. Whatever the group, investigators will follow recommendations to achieve optimal metabolic control and hemodynamic stability.
IHD group: a central venous access, a biocompatible membrane and bicarbonate dialysate will be used. In accordance with the management recommendations, the investigators will plan at least 3 sessions of 4 to 6 hours per week each with blood flow > 200ml/min, dialysate flow>500ml/min, high sodium concentration (>145 mmol/L) and low temperature (35°C) in the dialysate. The investigators will recommend urea reduction ratio > 65% for each session.
CRRT group: a central venous access and a biocompatible membrane will be used. The investigators will plan continuous treatment with a change of membrane every 72 hours (unless clotting occurs before). Choice between continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD), continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVHF), or continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) will be left at physician discretion. The investigators will recommend a minimum delivered dose of dialysis of 20-25 ml/Kg/h of effluent by filtration and/or diffusion.
For both groups, anticoagulation will be implemented according to center practice (regional citrate will be strongly recommended for CVVHDF). The randomly assigned treatment modality will be unchanged for at least 4 consecutive days unless renal recovery occurs before and mandates RRT discontinuation. A shift for the other modality will be allowed after this delay according to clinician decision.
Discontinuation of RRT will be contemplated when spontaneous diuresis is >500 ml/24h, and highly recommended if diuresis >1000 ml/24h without diuretic or >2000 ml/24h in patients receiving diuretics, as in our previous studies (AKIKI and AKIKI2).
Vital status, need for dialysis and serum creatinine will be collected at day 28, day 60 and day 90. Patients or their surrogates or the general practitioner (GP) will be contacted by phone. Prescriptions for plasma creatinine measurements (at D60 and D90) will be provided to the patient at discharge from the hospital.
Inclusion criteria
Non-inclusion criteria
The investigators plan to include 1000 participants. Adjusted difference between the proportions of the two arms, of patients who will meet one or more criteria for a major adverse kidney event at day 90 (MAKE90), will be estimated with 95% two-sided confidence interval (95% CI) by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method, stratified by fluid overload and vasopressor dose. If the upper limit of the 95% CI is < 7.5%,the investigators will conclude the IHD is not inferior to CRRT. If the 95% confidence interval does not only lie entirely below 7.5% but also adjusted difference is less than zero, a superiority test will be carried out using the same method. A subgroup analysis will be done according to fluid overload (≥ 6 liters from admission ICU to randomization) and to vasopressor dose (> 0.5 mcg/kg/min).
Medico-economic analysis: The cost estimation will be expressed with mean and 95% confidence intervals obtained by the bootstrapping method. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is defined as the ratio of the difference between mean costs and the difference on the primary endpoint. It will also be estimated by a mean and the 95% confidence interval using bootstrap method.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
*Definitions of these complication are provided in the main text (Section 7.1)
Exclusion criteria
renal replacement therapy (RRT).
renal replacement therapy (RRT).
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients who will meet one or more criteria for a major adverse kidney event 90 days after randomization (MAKE90). The MAKE will be the composite of death, RRT dependence and/or more than a 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline value. Baseline value of serum creatinine will be determined by either results of a measurement in the 12 months preceding the ICU stay or estimation using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation assuming that baseline eGFR is 75 ml/min per 1.73m2
Time frame: 28,60 and 90 days after randomization
1/ Time to death; day-28; day-60 and day-90 mortality
Time frame: 28, 60 and 90 days after randomization
Number of patients with more than a 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline value at different time points: D28, D60, D90
Time frame: 28, 60 and 90 days after randomization
Number of patients with dialysis dependence at different time points: D28, D60, D90
Time frame: ICU discharge until 90 days after randomization
ICU and hospital length of stay
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Time until cessation of RRT
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
Catecholamine-free days through day 28
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
ventilator-free days through day 28
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
RRT-free days through day 28.
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Estimated GFR at hospital discharge (data collected via electronic medical records or from the medical unit in charge of the patient).
Time frame: from inclusion until day 28
The number of episodes of adverse events from inclusion until day 28 (or ICU discharge if ICU discharge occurs before D28):
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
The 90-day Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ration (ICER) (cost per major kidney event, composite outcome of death, persistent renal dysfunction and dialysis dependency at day 90 or MAKE90), following the definition of the primary clinical endpoint.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Didier DREYFUSS, Pr,MD, PhD
CONTACT
Stéphane GAUDRY, Pr,MD, PhD
CONTACT
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Intermittent Hemodialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients
Acronym: ICRAKI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07215702
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07212595
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06251713
Acute Kidney Injury, Cardiac Surgery
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07718464
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details