Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05516797

IGNITE (Impact of Glucose moNitoring and nutrItion on Time in rangE)

The purpose of this study is to learn whether there is a difference in the amount of time glucose (blood sugar) stays within a target range (glucose 70 - 180 mg/dl) when using either continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or fingerstick blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in people with Type 2 diabetes who participate in the Virta Treatment program.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Health Partners Institute dba International Diabetes Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States

About this study

The purpose of this three-month, randomized, controlled trial is to compare the difference in change in 14-day CGM-derived TIR (% time with glucose 70-180 mg/dL) from Baseline to 3-months Post-Dietary Change in participants with T2D who are assigned to use either BGM or CGM. The difference in mean blood ketone levels and additional glycemic endpoints will also be compared, and several exploratory endpoints, including medication changes, dietary intake, and body weight will be described.

The study also includes a three-month Follow-Up period (months three to six), where participants will remain using their randomly assigned glucose monitoring modality (e.g., BGM or CGM); this period will help assess durability of the results found during the intervention.

This study will provide insights into how continuous feedback from CGM affects glycemic outcomes, such as TIR and HbA1c, compared to the standard method of BGM. It is important to understand if the methods of glucose monitoring differ, because greater TIR and lower HbA1c are associated with reduced risk of diabetes complications.

While many studies have compared the differences in glycemic outcomes between BGM and CGM, this study compares differences between the two glucose monitoring methods as part of a randomized, controlled intervention in people with T2D where dietary patterns will be adjusted. It is possible that this study will help demonstrate whether the continuous feedback provided by CGM influences adherence to dietary guidance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • U.S. residence with plans to remain in the U.S. for study duration (for shipping purposes)
  • Diagnosis of T2D
  • HbA1c between 7.5-11.5% documented within 60 days prior to consent
  • Stable diabetes medication regimen and lifestyle patterns (eating and activity) within approximately 90 days prior to consent
  • Using at least one glucose-lowering medication (oral or injectable) for diabetes management at the time of consent; if using insulin, this may include up to a total of three or fewer insulin injections per day (e.g., once or twice daily basal insulin, once or twice daily basal insulin plus one prandial insulin dose, once or twice daily pre-mix insulin, or another combination etc.)
  • English language comprehension
  • Confirmed download of FreeStyle Libre 2 app on personal smartphone with access to WiFi
  • Willing and able to record study data using smartphone, tablet, and/or computer
  • Willing to wear and use study-provided CGM devices for up to 7 months
  • Willing to perform fingersticks to test blood glucose
  • Willing to perform fingersticks to test blood ketones twice daily
  • Eligible to initiate and intention to participate in the dietary changes required as part of the Virta Treatment for at least 7 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Currently using an insulin pump or multiple daily injection insulin therapy with >3 insulin injections per day or using bolus injections to cover every meal
  • Currently following a self-reported, very low-carbohydrate eating pattern
  • Currently using a personal CGM or plans to use a personal CGM during the study period
  • Advanced-stage renal, cardiac, hepatic, or other chronic disease
  • History of ketoacidosis
  • Pregnant, lactating, or planned pregnancy
  • Allergy to medical grade adhesive or isopropyl alcohol used to disinfect skin
  • Participation in another interventional trial at the time of enrollment or during the study period
  • Participant is unsuitable for participation due to any cause as determined by Investigators

Treatment and study plan

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

Device

Use of CGM (FreeStyle Libre 2) compared to BGM for glucose monitoring

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Change in 14-day CGM-derived TIR From (3 Months Minus Baseline)

    Time frame: Three (3) months

    Change in 14-day CGM-derived TIR (% time with glucose 70-180 mg/dL) from Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change period between participants with T2D who are randomized to use either BGM or CGM (3 months minus baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 90-day Mean Blood Ketone Levels

    Time frame: Three (3) months / 90 days

    Mean of blood ketone levels from day 0 to day 90 (three months).

  2. Participants Reaching CGM-derived Consensus Targets

    Time frame: Three (3) months

    Percent of participants reaching CGM-derived consensus targets (targets defined as meeting both >70% TIR70-180 mg/dL and <4% TBR <70mg/dL) at the end of the 3-month Post-Dietary in both the BGM and CGM arms

  3. Difference in Change in HbA1c

    Time frame: Three (3) months

    Change in HbA1c from Baseline to the end of the 3-month Post-Dietary Change period between BGM and CGM arms

Other outcomes

  1. Difference in Change in CGM-derived Metric %Time Above Range >180 mg/dL During 3-month Post-Dietary Change Period (3 Month Minus Baseline)

    Time frame: Three (3) months

    Change in the % time above range >180 mg/dL, during the Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change period for both arms (3 months minus baseline)

  2. Difference in Change in the CGM-derived Metric, %Time Below Range <70 mg/dL (3 Months Minus Baseline)

    Time frame: 3 months (baseline to three months)

    Change in %Time below range <70 mg/dL during the Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change period (3 months minus baseline)

  3. Difference in Change in the CGM-derived Metric %Time Below Range <54 mg/dL, From Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change Period (3 Months Minus Baseline)

    Time frame: Three (3) months (baseline to three months)

    Change in % Time with glucose below range <54 mg/dL from Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change (3 months minus baseline)

  4. Difference in Change in the CGM-derived Metric, Mean Sensor Glucose, From Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change Period (3 Months Minus Baseline)

    Time frame: Three (3) months (baseline to three months)

    Change in the CGM-derived metric, Mean sensor glucose, from baseline to three months

  5. Difference in Change in the CGM-derived Metric, % Coefficient of Variation, From Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change Period (3 Months Minus Baseline)

    Time frame: Three (3) months (baseline to three months)

    Change in % Coefficient of variation from Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change (3 months minus baseline)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Abbott Diabetes Care
  • Virta Health

Registry information

Official study title

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Optimize Glycemic Outcomes in People With Type 2 Diabetes Following the Virta Treatment Program" (IGNITE: Impact of Glucose moNitoring and nutrItion on Time in rangE Study)

Acronym: IGNITE

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 26, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.