Health Partners Institute dba International Diabetes Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States
NCT Number: NCT05516797
The purpose of this study is to learn whether there is a difference in the amount of time glucose (blood sugar) stays within a target range (glucose 70 - 180 mg/dl) when using either continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or fingerstick blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in people with Type 2 diabetes who participate in the Virta Treatment program.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States
The purpose of this three-month, randomized, controlled trial is to compare the difference in change in 14-day CGM-derived TIR (% time with glucose 70-180 mg/dL) from Baseline to 3-months Post-Dietary Change in participants with T2D who are assigned to use either BGM or CGM. The difference in mean blood ketone levels and additional glycemic endpoints will also be compared, and several exploratory endpoints, including medication changes, dietary intake, and body weight will be described.
The study also includes a three-month Follow-Up period (months three to six), where participants will remain using their randomly assigned glucose monitoring modality (e.g., BGM or CGM); this period will help assess durability of the results found during the intervention.
This study will provide insights into how continuous feedback from CGM affects glycemic outcomes, such as TIR and HbA1c, compared to the standard method of BGM. It is important to understand if the methods of glucose monitoring differ, because greater TIR and lower HbA1c are associated with reduced risk of diabetes complications.
While many studies have compared the differences in glycemic outcomes between BGM and CGM, this study compares differences between the two glucose monitoring methods as part of a randomized, controlled intervention in people with T2D where dietary patterns will be adjusted. It is possible that this study will help demonstrate whether the continuous feedback provided by CGM influences adherence to dietary guidance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use of CGM (FreeStyle Libre 2) compared to BGM for glucose monitoring
Time frame: Three (3) months
Change in 14-day CGM-derived TIR (% time with glucose 70-180 mg/dL) from Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change period between participants with T2D who are randomized to use either BGM or CGM (3 months minus baseline)
Time frame: Three (3) months / 90 days
Mean of blood ketone levels from day 0 to day 90 (three months).
Time frame: Three (3) months
Percent of participants reaching CGM-derived consensus targets (targets defined as meeting both >70% TIR70-180 mg/dL and <4% TBR <70mg/dL) at the end of the 3-month Post-Dietary in both the BGM and CGM arms
Time frame: Three (3) months
Change in HbA1c from Baseline to the end of the 3-month Post-Dietary Change period between BGM and CGM arms
Time frame: Three (3) months
Change in the % time above range >180 mg/dL, during the Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change period for both arms (3 months minus baseline)
Time frame: 3 months (baseline to three months)
Change in %Time below range <70 mg/dL during the Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change period (3 months minus baseline)
Time frame: Three (3) months (baseline to three months)
Change in % Time with glucose below range <54 mg/dL from Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change (3 months minus baseline)
Time frame: Three (3) months (baseline to three months)
Change in the CGM-derived metric, Mean sensor glucose, from baseline to three months
Time frame: Three (3) months (baseline to three months)
Change in % Coefficient of variation from Baseline to 3-month Post-Dietary Change (3 months minus baseline)
HealthPartners Institute
Other
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Optimize Glycemic Outcomes in People With Type 2 Diabetes Following the Virta Treatment Program" (IGNITE: Impact of Glucose moNitoring and nutrItion on Time in rangE Study)
Acronym: IGNITE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06649344
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07732218
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT05351359
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Prague, Czechia
View Trial Details