National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07007715
The goal of this randomized trial is to compare four different flow-setting approaches for post-extubation use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Selecting the appropriate flow rate when initiating HFNC oxygen therapy is both crucial and challenging for clinicians, as the physiological benefits of HFNC depend significantly on the flow rate. To date, there are no guidelines or consensus on flow-rate setting and weaning for HFNC oxygen therapy.
The investigators hypothesized that physiological marker-guided flow setting using peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF) or PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios lead to better extubation outcomes as compared to empirical flow setting of 40 L/min or 60 L/min.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four study groups with different flow setting strategies summarized as follows: (1) Setting flow at 40 L/min, (2) Setting flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow, up to a maximum of 60 L/min. (3) Setting flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio <250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and >300 mmHg, respectively. (4) Setting flow at 60 L/min.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, Taiwan
Location status: Recruiting
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a promising intervention for post-extubation oxygen therapy, with the potential to improve oxygenation, increase end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), reduce the work of breathing, and lower the risk of reintubation. Selecting an appropriate flow rate when initiating HFNC therapy is both crucial and challenging for clinicians. Although the physiological benefits of HFNC depend significantly on the flow rate, arbitrarily applying higher flow rates without appropriate patient selection may increase the risk of barotrauma and patient discomfort. Currently, there are no established guidelines or consensus on flow-rate setting for HFNC therapy. Given the growing use of HFNC, determining the optimal flow-setting strategy is urgently needed to ensure both clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
This 4-arm parallel-group randomized trial aims to compare four different flow-setting approaches for post-extubation use of HFNC in extubation outcomes. The individual flow-setting strategy for each study arm is summarized as follows: (1) Setting flow at 40 L/min, (2) Setting flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow, up to a maximum of 60 L/min. (3) Setting flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio <250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and >300 mmHg, respectively. (4) Setting flow at 60 L/min. In addition, this study will incorporate measurements of peak tidal inspiratory flow and EELV to highlight the physiological characteristics of individual patients. These physiological measures may serve as both explanatory variables and potential predictors of flow responders. By examining the associations among flow responders, peak tidal inspiratory flow, pre-extubation oxygen demand, and changes in EELV, we aim to develop a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms and key factors influencing flow responsiveness during post-extubation care with HFNC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Setting flow rate at 40L/min
Setting HFNC flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF), up to a maximum of 60 L/min.
Setting HFNC flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio <250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and >300 mmHg, respectively.
Setting flow rate at 60L/min
Time frame: 5 days
A single global test of significance to compare between-group difference in the composite outcome
Time frame: 5 days
A single global test of significance to compare between-group difference in proportion of reintubation within five days
Time frame: 5 days
A single global test of significance to compare between-group difference in proportion of NIV use within five days.
Time frame: 28 days
28-day mortality
Time frame: 24 hours
Change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio between 0 and 24th hour
Time frame: 24 hours
Change in arterial CO2 level (mmHg) between 0 and 24th hour
Time frame: 24 hours
Proportion of ahead-of-schedule change in flow rates in 24 hours
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Other
Optimizing High-flow Nasal Cannula Settings: Comparing Different Flow Approaches and Exploring Physiological Phenotyping With End-expiratory Lung Volume, Peak Tidal Inspiratory Flow and Oxygen Demand
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07098611
Extubation Failure, Extubation Readiness
Punta Arenas, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT06593288
Extubation Failures, Extubation Readiness
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06632067
Extubation Readiness, General Anesthesia Using Endotracheal Intubation
Taichung, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07503509
Respiration Disorders, Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
View Trial Details