RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil System
DeviceBronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with Coils.
NCT Number: NCT02179125
Rationale: The PneumRx RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil (RePneu LVR-coil) is a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment designed to compress the areas of lung parenchyma most damaged by emphysema. The LVRC treatment was found to be feasible, safe and effective in previous studies. However, patient-based outcomes besides quality of life questionnaires are hardly measured after intervention treatments for COPD. Furthermore, the exact underlying physiological mechanism of the LVR-coil treatment is unknown. Another aspect of the treatment which we to date do not fully understand is which group of patients benefit of the treatment and which group of patients do not, this knowing that the responder rate is already about 60%.
Objective: The objectives of the study are to gain more knowledge on 1) the effect of the LVRC treatment on patient-based outcomes like physical activity, 2) the underlying physiological mechanism of the treatment, 3) the predictors of response to the treatment at baseline, and 4) on a targetted treatment number of coils to be placed per lung using lung compliance.
Study design: This study is a non-randomised open label multi-center intervention study.
Study population: The study population exists of adult patients with severe emphysema with no other treatment options left besides surgical procedures.
Intervention: Bilateral bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with RePneu coils.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoint is the change in physical activity between baseline and 3 months follow-up after the second treatment. The secondary endpoints are the changes between baseline and 3 months follow-up after the second treatment in: patient reported outcomes of the treatment, dynamic lung hyperinflation, static lung volumes, lung compliance, diaphragm function, lung perfusion, systemic inflammation and small airways function.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The LVR Coil has been designed to be as safe as possible. It was shown that the risks associated with the LVRC system are largely attributable to the bronchoscopic procedure itself rather than to the device per se. Therefore, it appears that the LVRC device itself does not appreciably increase the risk of serious adverse events beyond the risk of undergoing a bronchoscopy procedure or simply having emphysema. Currently, this treatment is not commercially available in the Netherlands and study participants will have to visit the hospital multiple times. Previous studies have shown that the treatment has beneficial effect for the patient, however not all patients respond. Part of this new study is to try to identify which group of patients respond to the treatment and which patients do not. Therefore, it is possible that a patient will not receive any benefits from the treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with Coils.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
*Change in physical activity measured by an accelerometer, 3 months following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
*Change in patient reported outcomes measured by the PSK (Patient Specifieke Klachten)-questionnaire, 3 months following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
*Change in lung compliance measured by a balloon catheter system, 3 months following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up.
*Change in diaphragm function measured by inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength (PI-max & PE-max), 3 months following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up.
*Change in quantified lung perfusion assessment measured by a perfusion scan using 99mTc albumin, 3 months following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
*Change in systemic inflammation markers measured in blood (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, fibrinogen), 3 months following treatment.
Time frame: Baseline vs 3 months follow up
*Association between baseline characteristics and outcome variables 3 months after the second treatment to try to identify responders and non responders.
University Medical Center Groningen
Other
Acronym: REACTION
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06040086
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01917331
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Szeged, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT06897748
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Aramil, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04119934
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details